READ THE OP! GTP Cool Wall Nomination Thread [Always accepting more cars!]

  • Thread starter Snikle
  • 3,560 comments
  • 373,074 views
I wonder if there is anyone who knew that car existed before GT6 brought it to the masses.

And I think you made a mistake with your engine specs, it actually is 491x2cc, equalling a total displacement of 982cc.

Fixing it right now. Did it have 2 engines powering it?
 
That's just how rotary engine displacement is written. A two-rotor engine of 982cc is written as 491x2 instead.

I have seen it done the normal way, however.
 
I wonder if there is anyone who knew that car existed before GT6 brought it to the masses.

And I think you made a mistake with your engine specs, it actually is 491x2cc, equalling a total displacement of 982cc.

I'd first heard of it while wondering wikipedia a few years ago.
 
The Countach 25th Anniversary was polled five years ago, and it fell short of the ice box. I believe this was because of the 25th Anniversary revised styling, which was reminiscent of Ferrari's Testarossa. The successor to the world's coolest car, the car that was featured on more posters than any other, the world's greatest supercar deserves a higher spot on the wall.

Lamborghini Countach LP400
image.jpg

Production: 1974-1977 (150 units)
Engine: V12 DOHC 375bhp 60 degree, light-alloy block with pressed-in liners
Drivetrain: mid mounted (longitudal), rear wheel drive
Top Speed: Possibly 196 mph; the Countach did not attempt a world record speed run until later, slower models.
Designer: Marcello Ghandini (Bertone)
 
1997-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS-T
GS-T.jpg

Specs
Engine: 2.0L Turbocharged I4 210hp (4G63)
Body style: 2-door coupe or 2-door convertible
Chassis: Chrysler PJ platform
Transmission: 5sp manual or 4spd auto
Weight: 2,877 lb (1,305 kg) or 3100 lbs (convertible)
Price: Average $3,566
Drivetrain: Front engine Front wheel drive
Length: 172.4 in (4380 mm)
Height: 49.8 in (1266 mm), 52.8 in (1340 mm)
Top speed: 140mph
 
1936-1940 Mercedes-Benz 540K (W24)

Mercedes_540K_side_20020707.jpg


Specs
(from Wiki):
Engine:
straight-8 OHV 5,401 cc (329.6 cu in) w/ Roots supercharger, 180 hp
Transmission: 4-speed or optional 5-speed manual, front-engine, rear-wheel drive
Body style: two seater cabriolet, four seater coupé, or seven seater limousine
Max. speed: 170 km/h (110 mph)
Wheelbase: 2,980 mm (117.3 in) (SWB); 3,290 mm (129.5 in) (Normal); 3,880 mm (152.8 in) (Special)
Curb weight: Up to 2,700 kg (6,000 lb)​
 
I've had an idea that would... well, pretty much improve every aspect of the cool wall. When a car's thread is posted, instead of looking up different specs for the car and posting them in the OP, why not post links to various webpages that could give those specs? You could give links to the wikipedia article, a specs page, and to a review of the car. Theoretically it would take less time to post the cars, less time to nominate cars (as the only thing needed is a picture) and it would give voters better information to make more informed votes.
 
I've had an idea that would... well, pretty much improve every aspect of the cool wall. When a car's thread is posted, instead of looking up different specs for the car and posting them in the OP, why not post links to various webpages that could give those specs? You could give links to the wikipedia article, a specs page, and to a review of the car. Theoretically it would take less time to post the cars, less time to nominate cars (as the only thing needed is a picture) and it would give voters better information to make more informed votes.
Because not all specs are sometimes listed on the same page.

You'll find this with a lot of muscle cars. Some sites only link horsepower. Others don't show 0-60 times. Some don't show weight. It's tough with some cars.
 
Because not all specs are sometimes listed on the same page.

You'll find this with a lot of muscle cars. Some sites only link horsepower. Others don't show 0-60 times. Some don't show weight. It's tough with some cars.

Yeah, and many (me) wont bother opening a new link to sift through a bunch of text for specs.

The person nominating should be responsible for providing thee basiic specs needed so WN can just copy/paste them into the OP under the pic.
 
Yeah, and many (me) wont bother opening a new link to sift through a bunch of text for specs.

The person nominating should be responsible for providing thee basiic specs needed so WN can just copy/paste them into the OP under the pic.
And then changes them anyways :lol:
 
Yes, as a matter of fact the CW did take a day off. Completely. Because I'm too lazy to do it until late at night, and then I don't do it at all.

@Jahgee124, stay on standby. I'm very seriously considering asking you to take over temporarily or permanently.
 
Yes, as a matter of fact the CW did take a day off. Completely. Because I'm too lazy to do it until late at night, and then I don't do it at all.

@Jahgee124, stay on standby. I'm very seriously considering asking you to take over temporarily or permanently.
OK
 
I'd like to make a fresh CW nomination.


Fiat/Bertone X1/9

(1972-1988)


800px-X19.jpg


Body-style: 2-Seat, Mid engined, Targa-Top, Sports-car.

Layout: Rear wheel drive, Mid engine.

Engine: Inline-4 sohc 2v/cyl. 1290cc and 1498cc.

Power: 75 HP and 85 HP.

Torque: 72 lbft and 87 lbft.

0-60 mph: 12.7 sec* and 10.8 sec*.

Top speed: 99 mph* and 110 mph*.

Transmission: 4-Speed and 5-Speed manual.

Curb weight: 880 kg and 912 kg.





 
Back