- 5,301
- Tijuana, B.C.
- MRT_Cinnamon
I wonder if there is anyone who knew that car existed before GT6 brought it to the masses.
It was completely forgotten after it was shown to the public in the 1970's, until recent years
I wonder if there is anyone who knew that car existed before GT6 brought it to the masses.
I wonder if there is anyone who knew that car existed before GT6 brought it to the masses.
And I think you made a mistake with your engine specs, it actually is 491x2cc, equalling a total displacement of 982cc.
Page 1, post 1 of this thread shows the current unpolled nomination queue.Is there a link to see where it has been done already?
And I have a picture of you taking a picture of that.
I wonder if there is anyone who knew that car existed before GT6 brought it to the masses.
And I think you made a mistake with your engine specs, it actually is 491x2cc, equalling a total displacement of 982cc.
I pictured him as 6'8" & 250 lbs.I always imagined Famine as being shorter, and taller.
With a beard that reached his knees, and a magical admin wandI pictured him as 6'8" & 250 lbs.
I don't think the Citroën BX Sport should have a go. It's way too similar to the BX19 GTi, which has already been polled, to be interesting.
Hey, @Famine! Over here!
Careful, for he will bring a gust of righteous wind upon the thread, and strike down thunders of indigo glory.
Bugatti Veyron EB 16.4
Because it's obvious that the rating is going to be similar to that of the Cadillac Cimarron.Seriously, how the hell has it taken this long for this car to be nominated!?
Because not all specs are sometimes listed on the same page.I've had an idea that would... well, pretty much improve every aspect of the cool wall. When a car's thread is posted, instead of looking up different specs for the car and posting them in the OP, why not post links to various webpages that could give those specs? You could give links to the wikipedia article, a specs page, and to a review of the car. Theoretically it would take less time to post the cars, less time to nominate cars (as the only thing needed is a picture) and it would give voters better information to make more informed votes.
Because not all specs are sometimes listed on the same page.
You'll find this with a lot of muscle cars. Some sites only link horsepower. Others don't show 0-60 times. Some don't show weight. It's tough with some cars.
And then changes them anywaysYeah, and many (me) wont bother opening a new link to sift through a bunch of text for specs.
The person nominating should be responsible for providing thee basiic specs needed so WN can just copy/paste them into the OP under the pic.
OKYes, as a matter of fact the CW did take a day off. Completely. Because I'm too lazy to do it until late at night, and then I don't do it at all.
@Jahgee124, stay on standby. I'm very seriously considering asking you to take over temporarily or permanently.