- 1,629
- Texas
- RC45
- RC45
The biggest problem with the armed population holding off a real military is organization and training. Your average Joe Blow Rural Californian or anyone for that matter does not have the know how to survive in actual conflict. No battalion organization. Under gunned as well. Ammunition as well. One guy has 5K rounds, another guy has 50 rounds and one magazine. Most people simply can't afford to be a defensive threat. Basically similar to the likes if an insurgent in say Iraq. Sometimes those boys would put a hurting on us but they lacked the training and weaponry. We had a command calling the shots. Motivation can only get you so far. Small pockets of resistance weren't much of a threat. It then becomes a battle of attrition. You can't stop insurgents but you can keep a pretty good handle on them.
In Iraq that is/was true because of the small population and very limited arms cache and ammunition available.
30 million people vs. 300 million people with hundreds of millions of rounds of ammo in civilian ownership and hundreds of millions of guns in civilian control.
Huge difference - the US/Coalition attacked and decimated Iraq in a show of shock and awe - then systematically swept the small isolated 3rd world villages and towns.
To accomplish the same thing any invading (or domestic oppressive) force would have to level the US and then somehow come to grips with 100 million+ armed people willing to defend their homeland.
We will be able to hold our own thanks - even against an organized force such as our own military.
Hell, I can count 6 or so families in our immediate circle of friends that could muster 25,000 rounds of ammo and about at least 70 guns - hand guns, rifles shotguns etc. without even trying very hard.
And we are all urban middle class. There is a reason ammo retailers run of ammo every week - it is because civilians are buying it up.
God Bless the USA. I wasn't born here but immigrated as soon as I could.