No.I think that we should re-run QP4
👍👍I think that we should re-run QP4
Two disconnects.What exactly happened in QP4?
It completely ruined my two blocks as I never had the chance to do runs on low fuel, in the Pescarolo I got a 37.6 almost full fuel I could've possibly done a high 36 in low fuel.I think that we should re-run QP4
I think that we should re-run QP4
Easier said than done. You have NO IDEA what is going on behind the scenes to get your time as fast as it is. Try putting a race together from news paper ( remember them) clippings. Compared to last year this is Very Fast. And as programs get developed it will get better. Remember this is NOT PD software that allows you to do this...it is AJs baby and it slowly comming of age.Lets be clear, in an effort to post a fast time, nothing is credible until you post stint photo. PURGATORY.
LETS EXPLORE LIVE SCORING for qualifying.
👍Please read article 7.3 of the Sporting regs. A Room Disco is treated as a red flag. So, therefore no time should be added nor shall a session be rerun.
So do I but an extra session could help, maybe.I think it's fine the way it is.
We have a policy: if you have to do it you get up at stupid o'clock.Exactly, people want something done because their only chance to qualify got cut short. They know how long qualifying is for. They should have prepared better and expected everything.
I don't think that is the right way to put because I for example was only able to do that session Sunday, as I had other commitments the previous day's when sessions were available.I think the problem here was everyone waiting til the last minute.
Fair point Cod, I should say that 'most' were waiting. That's how it seemed at least as that session was as full as a peak hour train!I don't think that is the right way to put because I for example was only able to do that session Sunday, as I had other commitments the previous day's when sessions were available.
But I still think there shouldn't be another QP session as you guys said.