CodeRedR51
Premium
- 55,319
- United States
I didn't think much about running wide at the cape at all. Or cutting the last corner at indy. It would be very unnatural to not do those things.
Already been there, don't want to go there again.
I didn't think much about running wide at the cape at all. Or cutting the last corner at indy. It would be very unnatural to not do those things.
This is what I was doing all day Saturday and Sunday, while I was getting bumped from 4th to 12th to the freakin 20's....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvIrjNxGUPI
(Although Saturday I was doing it in a lot of different cars.)
I didn't think much about running wide at the cape at all. Or cutting the last corner at indy. It would be very unnatural to not do those things.
The only reason I ever went wide in the first place in Round 1 was/is because I entered this competition to begin with to challenge myself to become amongst the faster drivers in sim racing by moving on to Round 2. I am here to compare myself to those who already have acheived being amongst the fastest sim racers in the country. I cant compare myself to these guys if I do not utilize every advantage/disadvantage they are utilizing. This is why I never would have even thought about cutting Indy or wall bouncing until the majority of the top guys became forced to do it.
Personally, I am not here to test my driving morals; I am here to test my driving skills. Whatever it takes to level the playing field (apart from the raw skill) I will do it. My only morals here are to not do what the majority of you fastest guys in the top 10s are not doing. If I exploited and you guys did not, that would destroy my reason for being here to begin with.
So you start racing with your magical, unscathed race car, moments after you total it, and you claim this is not by your own choice?
I didn't see any top-tier round 1 people doing anything cheap in round 2 they were all waiting to see if SCEA was going to do anything. The first person we noticed cutting Indy qualified 117th. That's actually how we noticed.
Now you're just being thick. The car never gets totaled as it isn't insured. The magic cars in GT-A don't even take damage; which is the only reason people don't hit the brake when they go over the obviously engineered jump in the middle of a fantasy track. That jump is only there to prove that cars can leave the ground in GT5. And everything else goes back to the original point that you cannot make ethical choices unless presented the option to do so. The lack of damage in the time trials is one of those things that the user cannot control.
w/ R1600 on this, well said cheef.
In all of the championships/races I've won, I've never once cheated, and even beat cheaters who were doing illegal things. I've even won many kart races where I was over-ballasted against great drivers. Those are the special days. Battling through adversity, and having inferior equipment has forced me to get better through driving. I'm thankful for it.
It's the spirit of healty competition that a purist is after, it's the great battle with another great driver that I live for. Emerging victorious in such a battle is the ultimate feeling. But I still have a smile on my face win or lose, if it was an epic battle. Fighting with those at the top in the Northeast has been awesome. I will literally never forget it.
Cheef I never wanted to use any exploits, and I didn't. I don't count the cape as one but like you said, 'exploits' are different things to different people.
Cutting Indy is just stupid, no need for that. Hitting the wall at Madrid is just as bad. The thing is, if other people do it and they allow it, then I'd live with it.
P.S. Would you think twice about hitting the wall if it meant advancing into the next round?
I just start driving again. The car is undamaged and does not need a reset button.
And I'm still not getting the vibe that you understand I'm not using the "you wouldn't do it in real life" argument. There are plenty of things you can do in games that you can't do in reality. That's why they're fantasy.
Z1NONLYI've already gone over this. The sim allows us to do many, many things we can't do in real life. Ghosts, e-brakes in race cars, no clutch, no fear, endless resets, etc. etc.
You have/use all of these optoins, but it's keeping all four on the track that makes you feel "real" and "dignified"?
Dr_WatsonThat's the only one you have a choice about. Ethics can't exist without an opportunity for the individual to chose how they want to behave in civilization. The things you're bringing up are a straw man as they are accepted norms and the contest could not exist without them.
The simulators mere existence contains the traits your extolling as cheating compared to reality. So just by playing the simulator we've all joined a civil agreement saying that we are all comfortable with the idea of suspending fear in the name of fantasy. However everything that happens beyond that initial civil agreement to suspend realism is a choice and therefore subject to ethical debate.
Lucky you. We don't start here until the end of March. LOL. I do that, too. 2nd at Nationals this year, with a few trophies before that. I also instruct at our two local tracks. I wish I could afford road racing.
I have the good fortune of running with a few national-trophy winners at our venue and they tell me regularly that I should compete in national events.
My problem is that my BSP 350Z on street tires has "no class" to compete in.
you're right... there's a youtube video of this jump somewhere, i just can't remember but (edit: he lost a right rear tire)a part of suspension was brokenwhen they landed.
I'm assuming this is the clip?this is from rally of turkey, my friend has a picture with the tire he left behind lol
PS: driver kept running !
Mr.Z1NONLY,
You had been singing the same song since the morning.
I must ask you, Why did Sony cancel round 2?
please tell us briefly..
Complaints.
Brief enough?
Get tires!!!!
Nice venue and good looking run! I was out autocrossing on sunday and rushed home to continue the academy only to see the news. Paxed 5th in with my 540 whp SM evo on street tires. Going hoosier r6 in a 295 soon!!!!
check out www.johnbtires.com for cheap take-offs
Complaints.
Brief enough?
The use of the term "gaymers" to refer to players who exploited the boundaries of the circuit is not acceptable and consistutes a breach of the AUP. If I see it again, I'll start issuing infractions. COnsider yourselves warned.
I have the good fortune of running with a few national-trophy winners at our venue and they tell me regularly that I should compete in national events.
My problem is that my BSP 350Z on street tires has "no class" to compete in.
STR is out of the question. I took an STR MR2 (on 255's)for two laps around our test and tune course and promptly crushed my Z that was riding on 275's.
Getting a co-drive is the only way I would have a shot at Nationals. And even though I "pick up" cars quickly, I seriously doubt I could pick up any car quick enough to trophy at that level.
If I bought a competitive car, set it up, and learned it, I might have a shot at one of the outside trophies, but at the moment that would require trading in my Z and I love the car too much for that. (even if it has "no class")
Congrats on your trophies.
For those that don't know, 2nd place trophy at SCCA Nationals is big time.
Please check the AUP regarding incorrect use of capital letters.
this has been one of the dumbest arguments ever on this board, with some of the most twisted and flawed logic i have ever seen. You guys have gone from arguing what is cheating, to who has done it, to why its morally acceptable and not acceptable to some of you, to why its not really cheating, to why you need to do it, to why you don't need to do it, what is realistic and not realistic, and "if the game lets you make a questionable jump on the racing surface, then why can't we cut?" this thread is full of so much fail its ridiculous.
When in the end, all that there is, is a video game, a competition, and whatever they allow in the competition.
All because a guy listened to his wife and gave erroneous rationalizations of why she was right.This has been one of the dumbest arguments ever on this board, with some of the most twisted and flawed logic I have ever seen.
All because a guy listened to his wife and gave erroneous rationalizations of why she was right.
I'm assuming this is the clip?
I don't recall getting THAT much air with the Nissan at Cape Ring!