Rule change suggestion

  • Thread starter Tedehur
  • 141 comments
  • 5,383 views

Do you want to allow lap time discussion and replay posting during the week ?


  • Total voters
    45
  • Poll closed .
Flat-out
I started to browse through the archive, looking for the posts I could remember :
  • when Casio mentions his discussion with Dan in week 48 (not sure if it's the one you mention).
  • when I suggested to Jake that he sends a replay during the week to a trusted driver so that it could be checked.
  • last year when NielsG clearly said that he's discussing times back channel (final paragraph of his long post)

And then I found :
  • This post, back in week 1 of the GT3 WRS, where Ron admits that he discusses laptimes with Max over MSN

So there is evidence that it has been going on since the very beginning of the WRS, and even before that.

As many stated, this is no conspiracy. It only starts with friends who share more than the WRS, get in touch with each other in RL, or via MSN, or email or whatever, and they just happen to speak about laptimes.
There's no bad intention IMO, and there's no way to prevent it.

Yet, since it has come to such an extent that most of div1 discuss their times back channel, I think it's a good thing that it has been brought into the spotlight and every racer knows about it.

Don't you just hate it when something comes back and bites you on the arse. :dopey:

I not trying to make a conspiracy out of this, I'm just trying to highlight how it is, or at least how I saw things as it turns out, even though I play a part in it. Perhaps deep down I've always felt that it wasn't right to be doing it because it's unfair, and this somehow influenced how I percieved the backchannel to be; a lighter shade of shady. Don't get me wrong, It's a great place to build up friendships, and sadly also a place to lose friends as it happens. So don't go thinking that I'm against the whole concept of the backchannel because I'm not, it's just that some things make me feel uncomfortable that results in myself regreating certain actions that I've undertaken. I guess I'm too sensitive.
 
Casio
That was on the 27 of January. Nearly 5 months ago, so it's hardly recently.

I've been doing this since 1999, so 5 months is recent.

Casio
I've been meaning to ask, why is how the WRS is run so important to you? You've submitted once in the last year.

If there was a requirement within the WRS whereby I'm expected to explain my reasons for not running then I would glady tell you why. There is not, therefore, I will not. :)

Edit: Sphinx checks the archives before he is shot down in flames again. ;)
 
Sphinx
If there was a requirement within the WRS whereby I'm expected to explain my reasons for not running then I would glady tell you why. There is not, therefore, I will not. :)
It just seems odd to me, that such a strong opinion of the situation comes from someone who doesn't actually participate. But anyway...

My solution is I've put my final time in a link in my signature. I'm backchanneling with Colby at the moment and he thinks my idea is pretty tight. Now the information is available to everyone (Including those too lazy to add us 'BackChans' to their MSN or shoot us an E-Mail). but if you don't want to know my time, then you best not click that link.
 
Casio
It just seems odd to me, that such a strong opinion of the situation comes from someone who doesn't actually participate. But anyway...

My solution is I've put my final time in a link in my signature. I'm backchanneling with Colby at the moment and he thinks my idea is pretty tight. Now the information is available to everyone (Including those too lazy to add us 'BackChans' to their MSN or shoot us an E-Mail). but if you don't want to know my time, then you best not click that link.

I do participate, and that alone entitles me to express my opinion in the same way as someone who has participated every week.

Nice idea with the sig btw.
 
Casio
It just seems odd to me, that such a strong opinion of the situation comes from someone who doesn't actually participate. But anyway...

My solution is I've put my final time in a link in my signature. I'm backchanneling with Colby at the moment and he thinks my idea is pretty tight. Now the information is available to everyone (Including those too lazy to add us 'BackChans' to their MSN or shoot us an E-Mail). but if you don't want to know my time, then you best not click that link.

I think it's a very good idea 👍 Just gonna implement it in my own sig now................

...done, excellent idea Casio 👍
 
Doesn't this thread just prove my point about the competetive nature of all involved in the WRS (past and present).

A simple question asked, a poll provided..............

And nearly 100 posts, and at least half of them are drivers trying to score points off each other! :D

Neil
 
Sphinx
I do participate, and that alone entitles me to express my opinion in the same way as someone who has participated every week.

So hypothetically speaking. If the WRS rules were changed to the way you wanted them, would you be inclined to participate more often? And by participate, I mean actually race.

Are your 'reasons for not running' related to this topic? Or completely unrelated. However, I understand if they are unrelated you may not wish to post them here, which is cool, I'm just interested.

Sphinx
Nice idea with the sig btw.
Thanks mate. Hopefully this is a step towards solving the problem.
 
I don't think it is fair to talk about a person's participation in the WRS during this discussion (unless they've never raced with the WRS before).

Fact is, Sphinx has been here a long time and that probably means longer than you Casio.
I mean, I haven't said one word about that sort of attitude and I was here for Supraman. Ron and Kell were as well and so were a few others but not one of us have questioned anyone's right or reason for voicing an opinion.

Sphinx has his right to post opinions even if he isn't as active as he once was. 👍

That said, I disagree with him and believe the system should be left as it is. 👍 :dopey:
Changing the rules just doesn't seem right.

Also, I want to see the suspense kept within the WRS.
It's no fun when you know the final results before the week is up.
And it certainly doesn't encourage people to submit times when they know they are going to lose. On top of that, knowing final times will also allow faster racers to never lose by a fluke (and inturn ruin the chances of underdog wins).

Of course, we shouldn't forget the concerns I brought up about the gentlemen's rules in the WRS about partcipating and posting T times... I'm sure that will lead to the same attitude about final times.👎

In any case, off to work for me now. :D
 
Casio
So hypothetically speaking. If the WRS rules were changed to the way you wanted them, would you be inclined to participate more often? And by participate, I mean actually race.

Are your 'reasons for not running' related to this topic? Or completely unrelated. However, I understand if they are unrelated you may not wish to post them here, which is cool, I'm just interested.

Seeing that you are pushing for an answer. My reasons are many fold. However, these disscusions have no bearing on my current lack of participation in the WRS.

Casio
Thanks mate. Hopefully this is a step towards solving the problem.

You're welcome.
 
Kent
I don't think it is fair to talk about a person's participation in the WRS during this discussion (unless they've never raced with the WRS before).

Fact is, Sphinx has been here a long time and that probably means longer than you Casio.
I mean, I haven't said one word about that sort of attitude and I was here for Supraman. Ron and Kell were as well and so were a few others but not one of us have questioned anyone's right or reason for voicing an opinion.

Sphinx has his right to post opinions even if he isn't as active as he once was. 👍

That said, I disagree with him and believe the system should be left as it is. 👍 :dopey:
Changing the rules just doesn't seem right.

Also, I want to see the suspense kept within the WRS.
It's no fun when you know the final results before the week is up.
And it certainly doesn't encourage people to submit times when they know they are going to lose. On top of that, knowing final times will also allow faster racers to never lose by a fluke (and inturn ruin the chances of underdog wins).

Of course, we shouldn't forget the concerns I brought up about the gentlemen's rules in the WRS about partcipating and posting T times... I'm sure that will lead to the same attitude about final times.👎

In any case, off to work for me now. :D

I don't think I've actually said which way I'm going to vote yet, so there's still time for us to agree. :sly:
 
Dave_George
To get an unbiased view of this I today gave my fiancee a quick lesson in gtp wrs "etiquette" and informed her of how the rules usually went each week (and with her having no former knowledge of this thread and current situation) I then told her that I could IM somebody and get a full replay that had the potential to help me go quicker and that this is ok cause its considered normal...

She said it sounded unfair because not everyone might know how to do that, that is was wrong as it contradicted in some ways what was written in the official weekly race thread, and finally she said that if it was known to be going on for so long then why did the wrs week after week race with "No discussion of final lap times"? - in other words it seemed pointless for the WRS to race like this when it was known that a large percentage of its racers didnt do that anyway!!

That's exactly why I suggested we make the back-channel stuff a "public" thing -- put a post at the top of each race (make it part of the rules for the race, perhaps) that tells exactly how to join in, or which links to a page where it lists instructions on how to join in. So that way, no one feels "left out." No one is left without the knowledge of how to do it, and thus it's not "unfair" anymore.

Either way -- posting instructions on how to join in the "backchannel" discussion, or allowing full disclosure on this site -- would be a fine option, in my opinion...
 
Casio
It just seems odd to me, that such a strong opinion of the situation comes from someone who doesn't actually participate. But anyway...

My solution is I've put my final time in a link in my signature. I'm back channeling with Colby at the moment and he thinks my idea is pretty tight. Now the information is available to everyone (Including those too lazy to add us 'BackChans' to their MSN or shoot us an E-Mail). but if you don't want to know my time, then you best not click that link.


Perhaps you two are going a little to fast IMO.
The discussion of publishing lap times is still going on and by showing the link there can be a situation created where there is no way back.
In that case the poll would be useless and the rule chance a fact.

BTW Guess I'm one of the lazy ones but have you ever considered that not all WRS members are (or wanna be)friends of each other.;)
 
sjaak68
Perhaps you two are going a little to fast IMO.
The discussion of publishing lap times is still going on and by showing the link there can be a situation created where there is no way back.
In that case the poll would be useless and the rule chance a fact.
I understand where you're coming from. But in my opinion, the general consensus was that the people who didn't know about the backchannel, thought that they knew no way about the backchannel, and it should be available to everyone. If everyone jumped on board this idea, then it's quite easy for everyone to see what the person they're chasings final time is. However, if they want to just do it on split times and not know the final time then they can do that too.


sjaak68
BTW Guess I'm one of the lazy ones but have you ever considered that not all WRS members are (or wanna be)friends of each other.;)
Again. With my system you don't have to be friends with me. I won't even know anyone looked. You can add most of us to your MSN and block us straight away if you hate us that much, as our final times are in our display names :sly:.
 
sjaak68
Perhaps you two are going a little to fast IMO.
The discussion of publishing lap times is still going on and by showing the link there can be a situation created where there is no way back.
In that case the poll would be useless and the rule chance a fact.

BTW Guess I'm one of the lazy ones but have you ever considered that not all WRS members are (or wanna be)friends of each other.;)

Backchannel discussion goes on, it's not gonna change, at least now everyone is privy to the information that is mostly discussed, lap times. If you choose not to look that's fine, but those who feel cheated now have the info if they want it. It also has no bearing on the outcome of the poll, the poll is in regard to race discussion in the thread, if anything the suggestion Casio had supports keeping the thread as is and just making the backchannel visible to those that want it. And if you don't wanna be friends with folk here then I think you're missing out on half of what WRS is about...community, but that's your choice, and I respect it 👍
 
Just been thinking about this. If it's OK to supply a link to enable those who want to know a lap time, then it must be OK to supply a link to enable those who want to see a replay.

?
 
Sphinx
Just been thinking about this. If it's OK to supply a link to enable those who want to know a lap time, then it must be OK to supply a link to enable those who want to see a replay.

?


I got a link for both (points to his msn icon under avator)
 
Small_Fryz
I got a link for both (points to his msn icon under avator)

Yeah but that would mean having to talk to you, I like the easy option ;)
 
Sphinx
Yeah but that would mean having to talk to you, I like the easy option ;)

I cant be given everything out on a silver platter now ;). Took me some effort to upload it, so i expect a little effort for you to ask :P
 
Sphinx
I have no idea what you're going on about

wanker.gif


I'll leave it at that..., wont go off topic anymore in this thread 👍
 
sjaak68
BTW Guess I'm one of the lazy ones but have you ever considered that not all WRS members are (or wanna be)friends of each other.;)

Now that is classic. :lol:
 
Something that I think may cause a problem or be an issue for some people, is that the latest final times posted aren't the final times that get submitted. I wouldn't have a problem with this, that way it still keeps things in the air I guess, but, maybe someone else might get bugged by that. Too bad?

I need to read through this thread now though, just saw it, and it's already way up there in posts. Haven't read yet, so this probably has already been mentioned. I don't frequent the Pit-Stop thread much/at all, so it just popped into my head while reading that.
 
Ok, so I've read up to post #62, and really, REALLY need to do something else, I wasn't planning on making much time for GT4 tonight, but it appears I'm already doing it. Damn addictions... :sly:

First of all, I voted yes. Second of all, after reading further through this thread, I think I'm going to say NO. I HAVE in the past conversed with others about final times before the end of the week, but only maybe 3-4 times since week 7 of GT4 WRS. I don't think I have ever watched a replay with the intent of improving my time, not necessarily even AFTER the week's race is over. I'm just too lazy.

Dave_George
I only hope that whatever happens it doesnt damage the WRS and that the figure of participating drivers goes up and not down as each week goes by....
I agree 100 and 90 millionty percent.
ballstothewall
Allow full lap-time discussion, but not replay posting.
Interesting idea there, mate. I like it actually. But possibly not enough.
luxy
I love watching two drivers trade laps back and forth, one-upping each other, even when I'm not involved. I think everyone's missing out when all of that action is taking place backchannel, not only in advantage, but in enjoyment also.
That happens even out of the "backchannel", but I'm sure not nearly as much. It'd be nice for it to happen more often, but there just aren't that many people racing in the WRS anymore. Back when I started, it appeared that people would race against people in their division that normally finish relatively close to each other in the results each week. As far as I knew, up until at least 10-15-20 weeks in for me), it was just going by the last sector time allowed to be posted. It may very well have been going on in PMs and on MSN. I don't have MSN, and don't want to get it, but if I want to know someone's time, I could easily PM them. I think I have done that maybe twice, and just with someone who is relatively close to my posted T times, and then challenge them to a competition between ourselves. Not necessarily giving each other advice, but more just posting our last time and encouraging the other to go back and beat it.
Kent
Also, tips on tuning and techniques should and are already shared, if that's a backchannel thing then the character of backchannelers who withhold info from the general wrs population needs to be checked- not the wrs.
AGREED! 👍
T13R
If it were to go ahead, I wouldn't want replays to be shared during the week, but I guess final times could be ok. Maybe if the final time is given as say 1'34.5xx, we would still know approximately the final time, but there is still that one tenth of uncertainty. Of course it will still remain impossible to make sure no one discusses full lap times and exchange replays elsewhere. I even admit I did it once when I had no clue what I was doing wrong.
Again, I like this idea, and like again the addition to Neil's suggestion with the xx bit on the end. But, who knows. I may still like it withOUT any final time discussion. Even without the final time discussion in the main WRS thread itself, I will not care that people talk behind the thread about whatever. Ghost swapping is kind of annoying, but still I don't care that much. I'd rather know that people are improving because of them pushing themselves, rather than following someone else's setup/line and adapting to that. STILL, that does not bug me too much. I dunno. :indiff:

I'd LOVE for all the talk and discussion that goes on on MSN to come over to the main thread. But with the times left out. I really wish I could participate in the full conversations though, but of course, Instant messenges will do that much more easily. :indiff: It's all good. But, if people start to talk about how they're taking lines or whatever/etc, it'd be AWESOME if they could also cut and paste their findings over to the weekly thread, etc.

Inferno, I'm ALL for people coming up with their own lines and driving style as well.

FWIW, I did not buy a maxdrive to watch other people's replays to become faster, I only bought one so that I can post my stuff and not be thought of as a cheater. I now have no problems with posting my replay each and every week, as when I get a fast time, I can put it on the maxdrive first thing and not worry about it being the wrong replay because I just saved it. Although, I'm lazy, and do not bother EVERY week, even so.


If at all possible, I think that my final conclusion(thus far) on this topic is that we allow posting final times up to the TENTH(rounded up or down as necessary, as in .501 is a .5xx, and a .551 is a .6xx), and NO replay transferring. And I'd LOVE it if people on the backchannels could abide by these rules as well. I think that this way we'd maintain the fun(mostly) of finding out the results in the results thread, but we still have a damn good idea of where someone else is at and we can go and try to catch up to and surpass them. Then, of course, transfer as much info as we can just about what we learn during the course of the week IN the main race thread.

And, FWIW, a few in the JGTC series already think(poorly, actually) of a place where people just post up times and then try to be king of the hill. Pfft, whatever. Over there, final time discussion is(I think?) more highly discouraged, and there aren't as many people helping each other out. If that's the type of racing you'd like to be a part of, and it IS fun, join up! It's a great series, and I'd like to play that way, AS WELL AS, the way we play in the WRS. And any version of the WRS. WRS for lifE! 👍
 
Stupid question on board!
Why would you wantto help somebody try to beat you? they can look at your replay after the week, and improve from there. this boggles my mind.
 
KLR142
I'd LOVE for all the talk and discussion that goes on on MSN to come over to the main thread.
It's really not as good as you think. It's 20 seconds talking about the combo, and a couple of hours of non-related anything. We don't don't sit down for hours discussing the right way to do every corner.

KLR142
If at all possible, I think that my final conclusion(thus far) on this topic is that we allow posting final times up to the TENTH(rounded up or down as necessary, as in .501 is a .5xx, and a .551 is a .6xx), and NO replay transferring. And I'd LOVE it if people on the backchannels could abide by these rules as well. I think that this way we'd maintain the fun(mostly) of finding out the results in the results thread, but we still have a damn good idea of where someone else is at and we can go and try to catch up to and surpass them. Then, of course, transfer as much info as we can just about what we learn during the course of the week IN the main race thread.

Why not replay transferring? I don't see any harm in that. It all makes us improve.

KLR142
And, FWIW, a few in the JGTC series already think(poorly, actually) of a place where people just post up times and then try to be king of the hill. Pfft, whatever. Over there, final time discussion is(I think?) more highly discouraged, and there aren't as many people helping each other out. If that's the type of racing you'd like to be a part of, and it IS fun, join up! It's a great series, and I'd like to play that way, AS WELL AS, the way we play in the WRS. And any version of the WRS. WRS for lifE! 👍
This will be controversial. But I 'backchannel' the JGTC too. We're all friends, and we've got nothing to hide.
 
LeadSlead#2
Stupid question on board!
Why would you wantto help somebody try to beat you? they can look at your replay after the week, and improve from there. this boggles my mind.

Well, it's not like we win anything by racing here. A cozy little spot on a leaderboard is about it, and most of us aren't even interested in that. We're interested in improving ourselves and each other, week after week. The community here is rather helpful, so if we can give someone tips on how to be faster, a large percentage of us will post if someone needs help. T times, lap guides, etc.

Besides, sharing a replay doesn't always mean that someone has the skill to chase that ghost and beat it. It may help them, but in the end, it still comes down to your skill level. That said, it gives you a little tingly feeling inside when you can provide a friendly rival with a replay early on in the week and though they may have talked some ish about beating you beforehand, you still emerge the faster driver. The little things.

Different strokes for different folks, though . . .
 
Why is this thread still going?

We have circled around a few times now.

What ever the outcome backchannel'ers will continue to swap replays and discuss final times

So basically this poll is for people not in the loop. as the outcome of this poll barely effects back channelers.
 
Back