Wat? Programmers need to program coordinates into missile so it can avoid AA and hit the target. Its not as simple as general pointing something on Google maps and missile hit it. My point was that paying to the programmer to do wrong data for missile isn't beyond realm of possibility.
You really think some nerdy dude is programing coordinates to a missile? You don't need to pay anyone, you can buy the missile, and choose between modes, between one that prioritises range, opting for a straight flight to the target, or you can choose the mode that avoids air defenses. In some cases, the missile depends on it's own sensors to detect radar emitions, and to avoid it by going "around" the radar. If you have an air defense that doesn't rely entirely on radar, and can detect via passive means (like IRST), the missile can't avoid anything, unless whoever is launching, knows where those air defenses are exactly.
Programers don't know where air defenses are, so they can only work on the missile programing on general way, and not mission specific programing.
In the end, to make the missile hit an hospital, you don't need to do anything, you don't need to bribe anyone, or kidnap their family or whatever, you just "tell" the missile "go there", and the missile goes, as the missile can't distinguish an hospital from a warehouse and there is no protocol to "not hit hospitals" in the missile. The missile will go where it is told to, as long as it is within its range.
My take on this all is they do it exactly for money, gas and oil to be precise. Around 2014 huge gas and oil reserves were discovered in the east of Ukraine, thats when it all started.
Thing is if Ukraine got to extract that stuff they could have used existing Russian pipelines running through Ukraine to deliver the gas and oil to Europe completely undercutting Russia big time.
Since Russia is all about oil and gas and they've never bothered to develop other sectors enough to help support their country and those natural resources are their only instrument to exert political pressure on Europe they went berserk with plans to annex those areas rich in natural resources - no matter the cost.
View attachment 1371518
Its always about money. Always each and every time.
Well, the thing with money, is that it has to be worth it. So no, it's not always about it.
If your country starts a war, where it spends 5 billion, and gets resources to gain 6 billion, it might be seen as worth it. But to start a war that costs 7 billion, to gain 6 billion from resources, makes no sense. (These values are just examples)
It makes sense that natural resources were the main focus of Putin, when the idea was to place a puppet regime in Kiev, that would be extremely profitable. The moment he failed to do so, and the war drags on and on, less value Russia gets from it and from those resources. Right now, it seems clear that Russia is at a loss, even if they ended up controling those resources. At this point, it's safe to assume that Russia, and Putin specifically, is too far into the war to end it. It's an ego thing.
Let's not forget, that Russia intends to control Moldova as well. Pretty sure they don't have no way near the same resources.
The Ghiana/Venezuela situation is a bit different. Ghiana is too weak militarily, which makes a war extremely profitable for Venezuela, given the amount of resources they win from controling Essequib vs what they lose during a conflict. This of course changes with international interference, like the US attacking Venezuela.
That's the whole point of investing in defense: to make a war extremely expensive for a potential adversary that's trying to grab your resources.