Thing is, Putin could stop tomorrow and claim victory, don't think anyone would complain much. Rumours and analytics saying that RF gov wants to stop this winter. Not like I believe in it much, but its still most reasonable way to go.That's quite the optimism.
If you never define what winning looks like, you can always claim you won!Thing is, Putin could stop tomorrow and claim victory, don't think anyone would complain much. Rumours and analytics saying that RF gov wants to stop this winter. Not like I believe in it much, but its still most reasonable way to go.
exactlyIf you never define what winning looks like, you can always claim you won!
even with no territory gain? I can maybe see Ukraine being forced to drop the Crimea forever, but I don't think giving up more land will be in the cards.Thing is, Putin could stop tomorrow and claim victory, don't think anyone would complain much. Rumours and analytics saying that RF gov wants to stop this winter. Not like I believe in it much, but its still most reasonable way to go.
Ukraine, right now, struggle to regain any territory, both sides stuck. Status quo looks like most obvious result for equation.even with no territory gain? I can maybe see Ukraine being forced to drop the Crimea forever, but I don't think giving up more land will be in the cards.
Which Ukraine probably cares VERY MUCH about.Ukraine, right now, struggle to regain any territory, both sides stuck. Status quo looks like most obvious result for equation.
After two years of war most Russians would be happy with this. IMO, even if RF end war at 01/2022 borders, everyone would be happy. No one here give **** about any Ukrainian territory, aside from Crimea.
Number of those who want to continue war in Ukraine constantly decreasing. Putin peace suggestion looks like insult, but if there will be something meaningful - why not?Which Ukraine probably cares VERY MUCH about.
Nobody in Ukraine wanted to START the war in the first place. They weren't given the option. You can't really have a decrease when you started at zero.Number of those who want to continue war in Ukraine constantly decreasing.
Not sure how its related. Obviously, Ukraine never wanted to start war with RF. Obviously, Ukrainians want to continue war, if not there would be protests against government that denied Istanbul agreements, at least, similar to what Russians did in 2022.Nobody in Ukraine wanted to START the war in the first place.
As long as there is an invader on your IN your home, of course you will continue fighting until you get them out.Obviously, Ukrainians want to continue war
What assurances does Ukraine have that Putin won't make up another excuse to start another campaign? Nothing will have changed. Putin could decide what he agreed do was not sufficient and could easily break the agreement for "reasons".Not sure how its related. Obviously, Ukraine never wanted to start war with RF. Obviously, Ukrainians want to continue war, if not there would be protests against government that denied Istanbul agreements, at least, similar to what Russians did in 2022.
There are dozens examples when its not the case. Its choice of nation, not only way to do.As long as there is an invader on your IN your home, of course you will continue fighting until you get them out.
None. Its not the reason to not try to stop death of you man for one day, year or forever. I don't think Ukraine should hand over any land, but fixation of status quo is simple way to stop death and destruction.What assurances does Ukraine have that Putin won't make up another excuse to start another campaign
To be winnable it needs x10 of what US give in short time. Current live support just prolonging suffering.As an American, I strongly hope and will vote in every election I can for politicians that will continue to support Ukraine until total victory. I'd be crushed if we cut a deal and gave up. This is a relatively conventional war with clear objectives and that means it is entirely winnable.
I kind of wish the Republicans were as anti-Russian as they were under presidents like Reagan. If pre-dementia Ronnie was president right now, we probably would've armed Ukraine to the teeth because he certainly loved a good proxy war. Unfortunately, Republicans now are pro-Russia because they aspire to be authoritarian like Putin and collect checks from the Russians. Democrats are more pro-Ukraine, but they walk a thin line between arming Ukraine and being anti-war.As an American, I strongly hope and will vote in every election I can for politicians that will continue to support Ukraine until total victory. I'd be crushed if we cut a deal and gave up. This is a relatively conventional war with clear objectives and that means it is entirely winnable.
Choice cant be enforced.There are dozens examples when its not the case. Its choice of nation, not only way to do.
I come to your home armed.Its not the reason to not try to stop death of you man for one day, year or forever
Not sure why you use ****ed analogue. You suggesting to continue pointless bloodbath, because Putin could start another bloodbath in the future(or not). And for whatever reason his next hustle should be more effective than current, even with Russia depleted its best infantry, tech and reserves from USSR times and under most lethal sanctions ever.I come to your home armed.... until all you property is mine
You can give a more relevant hypothetical: if Russia took back Alaska and went for California too based on former historical presence.Yes. It’s worth it.
This is a senseless, brutal war which YOUR country started.
My question is why the **** is your population sitting on your hands while your daddy wages war against a population. Not military targets. Population centers.
When do YOU stand up and say enough?
Don’t give me the excuse that you’ll be jailed or conscripted.
You post beautiful photos of the food you get to eat while thousands of Ukrainians go hungry and without power.
Ukraine should fight to the last person to defeat your country.
Imagine China invaded the US. They got California and Oregon in the initial wave. Should the US just Give those two states to China?
That’s what you are proposing.
It’s ludicrous.
Lost 10 million of population and few cities without any positive results to your nation?Yes. It’s worth it.
1) State startedThis is a senseless, brutal war which YOUR country started
My population protested since day one, even in democracy its take up to 10 years of protests and Global Oil crisis to finish war. Problem is, RF isn't democracy like US during Vietnam War, but authoritarian kleptocracy with millions police officers ready to beat you to death. 2/3 of protesters were sentenced, as you can imagine its not motivating to protest.My question is why the **** is your population sitting on your hands while your daddy wages war against a population.
Ukraine should do whatever is good for Ukrainians. Not sure, how total annihilation of all Ukrainians in war that can't be won without excessive Western support(that isn't on horizon)is good for Ukrainians.Ukraine should fight to the last person to defeat your country.
You know how people suggesting to others be a hero called? Hypocrites.When do YOU stand up and say enough?
Main question is how my posts and starving Ukrainians are related. Or how starving Iraqi or Afghan people related to Americans. IDK.You post beautiful photos of the food you get to eat while thousands of Ukrainians go hungry and without power.
Another stupid example. If those two stuck and further continuation of war means more people die without significant results - yes, both parties should stop fighting and peacetalk. Its called common sense.Imagine China invaded the US. They got California and Oregon in the initial wave. Should the US just Give those two states to China?
It's still not a useful analogy. The USA's $800,000,000,000 per annum military force, replete with paid, voluntary service people, is more than capable of defending it's borders, whilst being capable of simultaneously completely razing the homeland of any foreign aggressor, and whilst having the rest of NATO on hand to pitch in where necessary, without having to rely on every last citizen to die in the process.You can give a more relevant hypothetical: if Russia took back Alaska and went for California too based on former historical presence.
It was an analogy of pretext rather than strength.It's still not a useful analogy. The USA's $800,000,000,000 per annum military force, replete with paid, voluntary service people, is more than capable of defending it's borders, whilst being capable of simultaneously completely razing the homeland of any foreign aggressor, and whilst having the rest of NATO on hand to pitch in where necessary, without having to rely on every last citizen to die in the process.
Agreed. Russia is slowly inching forward but it's basically a stalemate at this point. Russia has more troops while Ukraine has better equipment. It really boils down to who can hold their ground longer (unless some peace agreement is drawn up).Ukraine, right now, struggle to regain any territory, both sides stuck. Status quo looks like most obvious result for equation.
After two years of war most Russians would be happy with this. IMO, even if RF end war at 01/2022 borders, everyone would be happy. No one here give **** about any Ukrainian territory, aside from Crimea.