And in response Russia uses tactical nukes. Then what?
And Ukraine is now allowed to use long range weapons on Russian territory. Let's ****ing go.
According to Russian constitution Crimea isn't anyhow different from Moscow or Saint Petersburg. Crimea was targeted with western missiles for year+And in response Russia uses tactical nukes. Then what?
Not gonna happen. The nuke thread and red line shifting has been a thing ever since the first Ukrainian weapon upgrade unlock.And in response Russia uses tactical nukes. Then what?
But if they decide that they can't conquer and use it, they may well act in ways to make sure that nobody else can either. Which would be insane, but entirely on brand for the kind of ridiculous strong man bollocks many governments are leaning hard into these days. If you act like enough of an unhinged aggressive tyrant, other people will give you what you want simply to avoid being on your bad side.It wouldn't make much sense to drop nukes on land and people that you intend to conquer and use in the immediate future.
Admittedly, this could be a dangerous assumption to make in these chaotic times, but still.
Do you understand that Ukraine and Russia were part of USSR and Ukrainians were in power of USSR for longer? Do you understand that Ukraine and Russia has same economical model? Its as commi as modern Germany, France and North Europe. Usage of Cold War nicknames in current situation is just nonsense.Reap what ya sow commies.
Nothing new
signed a new doctrine
It doesn't. Putin had ultimate power to use nukes before and have now, nothing is changed.it looks like
If by PA you mean Putin Administration, you wrong. Because, by "they" I mean Putin Administration, not news outlets.It's worth noting that PA doesn't "create" news either.
So this isn't a new doctrine which he's signed then? Only everyone else but a random guy on the internet who has a habit of "misunderstanding" the English language says that it is.It doesn't. Putin had ultimate power to use nukes before and have now, nothing is changed.
By "PA" I mean "PA", the Press Association, whose Tweet I posted (you know, where it says "PA Media" and "PA" right in there) and to which you responded and quoted to say "Nothing new, they just creating another hot news to remind about scary red button.":If by PA you mean Putin Administration, you wrong. Because, by "they" I mean Putin Administration, not news outlets.
Unfortunatly the word "news agency" does mean different things depending on the nationality and indoctrination.It's a news agency.
This is new doctrine that doesn't change a dime.So this isn't a new doctrine which he's signed then
We at war for 2+ years and your "everyone" still doesn't understand how Russian law work. In fact, there are a lot of experts that understands that, but surprisingly they are mostly Russian.Only everyone else but a random guy on the internet who has a habit of "misunderstanding" the English language says that it is.
no ****, SherlockPA doesn't create squat. It's a news agency.
This is new doctrine
Heh.Nothing new
Ah, the person saying dumb stuff now acts like they're the smart one in the conversation. Twas ever thus.no ****, Sherlock
The funniest part about it is that Ukraine seeks to win out this war by targeting key military territories and etc.Boo hoo to Russian complaints about this. Russia has been using foreign materiel so it's a taste of your own medicine.
Had he not invaded Ukraine again, would Finland have joined NATO and increased Russia's NATO border by 833 miles / 1,300 kilometres? Probably not.Putin is indeed a genius.
He starts a war against a neighbouring country on the pretext that the 'West' is using Ukraine to threaten Russia's very existence, resulting in Western weapons being used against targets in Russia itself for the first time in modern history.
One has to ask, if Russia had not invaded Ukraine, would a single 'Western' weapon have ever been fired into Russia?
And with them continuing to commit to this war, even a total success would only lead to a further increase of direct NATO borders with Poland, Slovakia, Hungary and Romania on the opposite end of Ukraine - and at that point it's not exactly NATO doing the "encroaching".Had he not invaded Ukraine again, would Finland have joined NATO and increased Russia's NATO border by 833 miles / 1,300 kilometres? Probably not.
Thanks to Kaliningrad's, um... unique existence, Russia's border with NATO was previously a mere 300 mi / 500 km. So now this jenius has more than tripled it.
Is that the "debris" of the missile coming down?Russia strikes Dnipro with ICBM missile.
MIRV- multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle. One rocket carries several warheads. But looks like these were inert.Is that the "debris" of the missile coming down?