- 2,605
- Newport
- NFSCARBON1
muh morals
i wanna drive imola why should the senna brigade stop me
The issue isn't adding Imola, it's adding it with the Senna Content. It would be in bad taste to package them together, even more so with the Williams.
muh morals
i wanna drive imola why should the senna brigade stop me
Imola can not be added. Period.
This. I can't think of a clearer way of putting it. Well said.Is this really difficult to understand? Look, Imola cannot be added because the DLC is supposed to celebrate his life and achievements, and giving us the car in which he was killed and the track he was killed at surely is not a celebration of his life. It is in bad taste and rather trivialises the gravity and seriousness of the incident. I'm not against the addition of Imola, but the obvious links between Senna and Imola cannot be escaped. It should be added in a separate context, away from this.
Good thing PD is cheap, cause there's virtually no chance for Imola to appear, mostly because of PD never adding free tracks. Also because of the accident thing. But that also means no Interlagos either because PD.
Agreed. From all reports 100% of the Senna content will be free. They could charge $10 for it all and it would do quite well.So much negativity... You really can't say PD care only for money, remember every DLC is free since the launch. We will also have 3 free tracks layouts.
If you take a gander at the PCars track list and what they've done with a much smaller team in just 2 years, with less than 1/10th the reported budget of GT5, creating 2 tracks that are very close to two tracks already modeled in the game is nowhere near what I'd call a massive undertaking.Agreed. From all reports 100% of the Senna content will be free. They could charge $10 for it all and it would do quite well.
If all of this reported Senna content (cars, tracks, time trials, videos, etc) come to fruition, then it would be a massive project to complete. For example, just think of all of the testing and perfecting of the 1980's Brands Hatch and '85 Lotus just to match up with Senna's pole time. That along with the major project of the GT Academy, I can fully understand why GT6 would appear to be widely "unsupported" to this point. If all of this happens and GT6 starts getting updates on the regular, all of my disappointment with GT6 will be forgiven. For the first time in a while I'm excited about Gran Turismo again.
Few bucksAll I want to know is how much credits you can win in these Senna events?
Why is the "bad taste" argument silly?To the argument that people would recreate the crash that took his life, what's stopping people from doing that when Imola could be released down the road, hmm?
I understand it's bad taste, but that argument is silly. As for the other ones, I agree with them.
A few? It should be at least around 1M.Few bucks![]()
Ooooops, It loaded my old draft and I forgot to fix that part.Why is the "bad taste" argument silly?
Agreed. From all reports 100% of the Senna content will be free. They could charge $10 for it all and it would do quite well.
If all of this reported Senna content (cars, tracks, time trials, videos, etc) come to fruition, then it would be a massive project to complete. For example, just think of all of the testing and perfecting of the 1980's Brands Hatch and '85 Lotus just to match up with Senna's pole time. That along with the major project of the GT Academy, I can fully understand why GT6 would appear to be widely "unsupported" to this point. If all of this happens and GT6 starts getting updates on the regular, all of my disappointment with GT6 will be forgiven. For the first time in a while I'm excited about Gran Turismo again.
That actually looks more like the 97t, just in yellow.Hell yes... PD tried once, right?
The standard cars that nobody would complain to have right now...
![]()
Strange choices of 1980s tracks to include. I would have picked Spa '85 and Osterreichring '85 personally, now those are bad-ass 1980s tracks.Fuji 1980s needs a return too, although the '85 Lotus didn't race there, but who cares?![]()
![]()
That make sense, but that's still better than nothing, I was not expecting any, and we will get 3Chosen because they were the least amount of work to chance, I'd imagine.
Cote D'Azur must be forgotten about then.... that would have taken even less work than Monza and Brands Hatch to get into it's 1985 configuration.Chosen because they were the least amount of work to chance, I'd imagine.
Cote D'Azur must be forgotten about then.... that would have taken even less work than Monza and Brands Hatch to get into it's 1985 configuration.
Back then it wasn't the A1-Ring (now Red Bull Ring), but a different layout.Yes... The A1 Ring would be great