cm and cs tires seem to be a way better tire..after watching ALOT of formula d and d1gp for many reasons.
1. real drift cars drift low as 40 to even 80mph cm and cs can do that
2. real drift cars it or not are a lil grippy and snappy like cm or cs
3. ch are too slippery and slow to be even accurate to a real car
4. real drift cars dont drift at 25mph in 5th gear (thats totally off)
5. even the drift cars on gtp are equiped with cs tires
6. real drift cars can drift but needs to be tuned to drift proper, unlike ch the tires are like vaseline like ch tires
7. real drift cars dont have tire spin all the way through 6th gear while accelerating on straight like ch tires
8. ch tires are good beginner tires but they are much to slow and slippery, no matter what car you drive from a 160hp japanese k car or a 800hp lambo you will be drift at slow speeds in 5th gear and now real drift drift car sits in 5th gear low rpm drifting. Real drift are at 3rd to 4th at a high rpm drift, hearing the scream of a rotary instead of a suttle quiet slow drift.
I hope you guys need to atleast agree that cm tires are better than ch......thats my opinion
Respectfully, ill try to counter argument everything possible here:
1. Depending the car, CH can keep those speeds too. Of course with too much more smoke and wheelspin. Would be more clear if you tell us witch car(s) youre drifting.
2. Real drift cars normaly are heavier than what we are used to make in GT5. It drasticaly brings influence to slip distance, grip ratio x angle, inertia and more.
3. I disagree due the simple fact that GT5 is a simplified simulator, and real life cars are much harder to drive than in GT5. So the closest we can have in responses is the CH. And no, CH is not too slippery.
4. Keep in mind that we are dealing with cars with 400hp, 500hp or even more. Besides, even my SLS don´t have this behavior in the situation that you described, running on CH. Maybe you need to review your gearbox and LSD settings?
5. Maybe because the developers denie to see that the majority consider the online drifting as the real deal instead the solo-scoring-based drift, including the slighty diferent physics?
6. I have a diferent point of view here. Im glad to be able to use CH, otherwise i couldn´t use anything with less than 300hp for drifting and keep a correct line. I hadn´t tried, but is possible to achieve a single manji + reverse entry in the main straight in Tsukuba using a fully tunned AE86 using CS?
7. Again, i would need see it on live to figure exactly what you are talking about. You would need to clarify what car youre using specify all your setup.
8. CH are good for beginners, indeed, cose nothing worst than start to learn with the wrong idea, wrong techniques, wrong concept and many other wrongs. CS or any other tyre set is not the "evolution of the CH", also CH is not a starter tyre set. The CH is the tire of choice in Japanese Lobbies, and who am i or who are you to disagree from them?
So maybe its just a diferent concept of the whole idea of what drift is about. CH users when find something wrong in the car, they don´t blame the tires, but they dig a lot in their settings. CH users are worried to make a perfect line, door 2 door drift, fight against the inertia hooking the apex in huge angles. About your "unecessary burnout", i dont feel the same way, any powerfull car have a wild throtle. Also i cant complain about the speed gaunge and the adrenaline rush inside this speed pattern, because it feels pretty much similar to what i noticed on LSF or R-Factor (Overster Mod), about speed and grip ratio.
Anyways, even with all these argumentations, im not here to preach and say to people use CH. You can use whatever you want, but the CH lobbies always will be better and i hope that people can deal with CH like masters when get in a room with these standards.