CodeRedR51
Premium
- 55,350
- United States
Dawn of the Dead, 300, Watchmen, and Man of Steel?Nor is Zack Snyder, but I'm not sure why anyone cared enough about his opinion to ask him in the first place.
Dodgy remake.Dawn of the Dead
Over-rated.
Missed the point of the source material.Watchmen
Hasn't been released yet.Man of Steel?
No, he didn't - Danny Boyle did that with 28 DAYS LATER in 2002.Introduced running zombies
Made money and survived the fan backlash.Dodgy remake.
AKA, large audience love, that you disagree with. Made money and survived the fan backlash.Over-rated.
The closest of any Allan Moore story on film. Made money and survived the fan backlash.Missed the point of the source material.
Will make money and survive the fan backlash.Hasn't been released yet.
I may be wrong, as I saw Dawn of the Dead first.No, he didn't - Danny Boyle did that with 28 DAYS LATER in 2002.
I'm not neglecting it. You wanted to know why Hollywood cared to ask him. He is good (not Oscar worthy, but good) at taking other's source material and script and turning out a film that is mostly liked and makes money.You're also neglecting to mention the abysmal SUCKER PUNCH, which attempted to combine INCEPTION and strippers with a complete lack of restraint and garish, vomit-inducing and schizophrenic CGI. It wound up as a mysoginistic mess dressed up as a tale of female empowerment with an ending that made absolutely no sense (assuming you got that far).
Disney is said to be planning on taking the 'Marvel' approach to Star Wars and releasing a new film every 2-3 years with some that focus on different aspects of the Universe, but they're remaining tight-lipped about all of this for now. Star Wars: Episode VII, meanwhile, will move forward with a screenplay by Michael Arndt for a release in 2015.
Did you just compare my stories to my wife's stories? They have nothing in common, except alternate timelines, characters coming back from the dead, surprise parental revelations, and nonstop backstabbing and trickery.In other words, the next three films might not be a straight trilogy as in the other films, but rather a soap opera on film, for lack of a better explanation.
Episodes 1-3 were already a soap opera.In other words, the next three films might not be a straight trilogy as in the other films, but rather a soap opera on film, for lack of a better explanation.
Really? I couldn't think of a worse director. Have you seen the trailers for STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS? They're just a mish-mash of every film that has made money in recent years, devoid of a single original thought.
Really? I couldn't think of a worse director. Have you seen the trailers for STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS? They're just a mish-mash of every film that has made money in recent years, devoid of a single original thought.
Yep. That kills any enthusiasm I might have had for it.
Yep. That kills any enthusiasm I might have had for it.
Nope. Where Abrams said "I want it to be an homage to Steven Spielberg", all I heard was "I was to be Steven Spielberg".Guess you weren't a big fan of Super 8 ah?
It will be when he ruins the franchise in ways George Lucas could never have imagined.We've all got problems.
Thinking JJ Abrams is the worst director ever is not one of mine.
It will be when he ruins the franchise in ways George Lucas could never have imagined.