He has a point, which is why triple rear wing time attack cars and others are not tasteful. Because tasteful as said above isn't the same as insane...quite the opposite. Some would say (many I know) that tasteful is a moderate take and even subtle. A Cessna engine sitting between you and a thin firewall is not.
Be glad I hardly share TA cars in general, the extravagant type ofcourse. Depends if the car looks okay and such.
That wasn't the point, thanks for trying.
The way you worded it sounded a bit harsh, to be honest. I'm not gonna even argue with you, a waste of time. Move on, people.
Harsh? Kind of strange to me, as I said he had a point and still does. Which is why I gave you praise for the actual cars I did find tasteful from your post. Seems you've missed half the context.
I meant the thanks for trying part, sounding a bit harsh. I know he also had a point and couldn't counter that, some think some cars aare tasteful, some does not. It's called having an opinion. Some would praise the guy to have guts to make such thing, other, abysmed about it, or worried. Or calling showboating or something, I don't know.
As for the second part of your post, I see, thatw as my bad. I still am not very good to judge posts perfectly fine - I cleaarly still misunderstand a few things - the glory of not being 100% fluent in the english language and misinterpreting some things.
At worst you get a little, oh, enthusiastic at times. It's generally fairly readable.Seems I just happen to create a mess of a chat anyway so, don't mind that.
BBS makes me wish I had money
I think that this car is a stroke of genius. Never in a million years would I expect to see something as mental as this.
Really? You might want to look at the 'Odd modifications' thread.Never in a million years would I expect to see something as mental as this.
It's a 🤬 ton better than that ghastly Golf next to it.
This now makes me wish Mitsubishi tried making an Evo hatchback.
This now makes me wish Mitsubishi tried making an Evo hatchback.
Eh, it doesn't feel the same to me. I'm talking about a full-on hatchback body style of a Lancer Evolution, not just a baby.The Colt Ralliart is basically a baby Evo X.
Eh, it doesn't feel the same to me. I'm talking about a full-on hatchback body style of a Lancer Evolution, not just a baby.
I think that this car is a stroke of genius. Never in a million years would I expect to see something as mental as this.
The Colt Ralliart is basically a baby Evo X.
How?
It's a joke. It just looks similar in front-end styling, and it's got a little 1.5 turbo engine.
This now makes me wish Mitsubishi tried making an Evo hatchback.
[/QUOTE
I would like to see them.It's surely not the first I could provided you several other vehicles powered by prop or WWII airplane engines.
You can find them scattered around the internet, it's not that hard.I would like to see them.
As in cars powered by WW2/Prop engines.You can find them scattered around the internet, it's not that hard.
-----
View attachment 584664 View attachment 584665
On second thoughts, what I should've asked is - "are there any other cars powered by radial engines?"It's surely not the first I could provided you several other vehicles powered by prop or WWII airplane engines.
Yep, the Monaco Trossi.On second thoughts, what I should've asked is - "are there any other cars powered by radial engines?"