In which you quote a post that referenced PC2, specifically talking about the hand back penalties in PC2.
Which is why you don't use it for contact.
My apologies, i shall amend my errand ways.Please don't double post (post more than one in a short period of time, when no one else has posted), the site has a range of multi-quote and edit tools.
Can I also ask that you ensure all your posts use good, basic grammar. Including starting sentences with capital letters.
Thanks.
For these Championship FIA races PD should have put up a very strict super fast target qualifying lap at somewhere like the the Nurb that requires 100% on track and no wall contact whatsoever! when a driver is able to run this lap clean and legitimately and beat the lap time with no incidents then they should be allowed to enter the competition.. If they can't do it then they don't get in as simple as that! It will separate the wheat from the chaff and the genuine racers from the idiot punters and wallriders 👍
But no! .. they let any old Tom, Dick and Knobhead take part and wreck it for others 👎
For the record I haven't even signed up for these events as I knew in advance what carnage it would be and my fuse is super short enough
I know.Yes, there is a PC2 reference there,
It was about both GTS and PC2, more specifically about how a PC2 style system could be incorporated into GTS. You can't acknowledge the quote referenced PC2 and then claim it was just about GTS!but the post I quoted is about GT Sport
Penalties don't always result from contact.and the idea that the car who is behind should have to return the position if they get a penalty in connection to the overtake:
"Well, they know who to give a penalty too, if the one who's behind does something penalty worthy and gains a place within a certain amount of time, the result is clear."
I know, and I think you may be reading more into the post you quoted that it actually says.My point exactly.
True, but then you would get an audience the size of iRacing, and when you have bet the farm on on-line esport and effectively removed single player you can't do that unless you want to destroy the brand.For these Championship FIA races PD should have put up a very strict super fast target qualifying lap at somewhere like the the Nurb that requires 100% on track and no wall contact whatsoever! when a driver is able to run this lap clean and legitimately and beat the lap time with no incidents then they should be allowed to enter the competition.. If they can't do it then they don't get in as simple as that! It will separate the wheat from the chaff and the genuine racers from the idiot punters and wallriders 👍
But no! .. they let any old Tom, Dick and Knobhead take part and wreck it for others 👎
For the record I haven't even signed up for these events as I knew in advance what carnage it would be and my fuse is super short enough
I don't quite follow your reasoning, just because you are super fast around a Track, on your OWN, how does that qualify you to be a better racer with 20 other cars on Track? Surely racing is also about situational awareness and your perfect clipping point could be occupied requiring you to change your line. Speaking as one of lowly Knobheads you mentioned I can assure you that just because i am slower does not infer i'm dirty.For these Championship FIA races PD should have put up a very strict super fast target qualifying lap at somewhere like the the Nurb that requires 100% on track and no wall contact whatsoever! when a driver is able to run this lap clean and legitimately and beat the lap time with no incidents then they should be allowed to enter the competition.. If they can't do it then they don't get in as simple as that! It will separate the wheat from the chaff and the genuine racers from the idiot punters and wallriders 👍
But no! .. they let any old Tom, Dick and Knobhead take part and wreck it for others 👎
For the record I haven't even signed up for these events as I knew in advance what carnage it would be and my fuse is super short enough
For these Championship FIA races PD should have put up a very strict super fast target qualifying lap at somewhere like the the Nurb that requires 100% on track and no wall contact whatsoever! when a driver is able to run this lap clean and legitimately and beat the lap time with no incidents then they should be allowed to enter the competition.. If they can't do it then they don't get in as simple as that! It will separate the wheat from the chaff and the genuine racers from the idiot punters and wallriders 👍
But no! .. they let any old Tom, Dick and Knobhead take part and wreck it for others 👎
For the record I haven't even signed up for these events as I knew in advance what carnage it would be and my fuse is super short enough
I don't quite follow your reasoning, just because you are super fast around a Track, on your OWN, how does that qualify you to be a better racer with 20 other cars on Track? Surely racing is also about situational awareness and your perfect clipping point could be occupied requiring you to change your line. Speaking as one of lowly Knobheads you mentioned I can assure you that just because i am slower does not infer i'm dirty.
I don't quite follow your reasoning, just because you are super fast around a Track, on your OWN, how does that qualify you to be a better racer with 20 other cars on Track? Surely racing is also about situational awareness and your perfect clipping point could be occupied requiring you to change your line. Speaking as one of lowly Knobheads you mentioned I can assure you that just because i am slower does not infer i'm dirty.
How hard can it be for the game to take note of if you have a certain number of collisions in a set number of races the replay are sent to PD so they can ban those responsible for driving dirty and gaming the broken system, But that'll never happen unfortunately.
PD will not ban anyone no matter their "style" of racing.Its a game for everyone remember?
With that said,SR/DR is supposed to seperate people depending how fast/slow/clean/dirty they are.
Would that be the same FIA that allow the use of driver aids in a number of its series?How hard can it be for the game to take note of if you have a certain number of collisions in a set number of races the replay are sent to PD so they can ban those responsible for driving dirty and gaming the broken system, But that'll never happen unfortunately.
Another option would be for the FIA races to ban all aids, I can bet that the crashkids are the ones who rely on all the aids, If they can't drive without them they'll leave and return the game.
They try to make it look like a serious e-sport competition.That does not mean its actually that.Exactly and I've been saying it from day one, How can a game that tries to be serious about competition be for everyone that makes zero sense, PD need to either jiggle with the current penalty system a lot or start banning people who game/cheat the system.
Would that be the same FIA that allow the use of driver aids in a number of its series?
Again the use of aids does not make one a bad or dirty driver.
Another option would be for the FIA races to ban all aids, I can bet that the crashkids are the ones who rely on all the aids, If they can't drive without them they'll leave and return the game.
....and would that be the same FIA that cannot enforce their own rules uniformly? (*cough* track limits *cough*) :-)Would that be the same FIA that allow the use of driver aids in a number of its series?
While I like the suggestion a lot, it still will not solve the worst problem, which is the corner punting tactic. The bump from the offender does not have to be hard to send the victim off track. So it would likely result in much more damage for the victim than the offender... :-/Quick and working solution:
Full damage ON
As well tire wear and grip reduction real.
Those will teach to drive with some respect.
While I like the suggestion a lot, it still will not solve the worst problem, which is the corner punting tactic. The bump from the offender does not have to be hard to send the victim off track. So it would likely result in much more damage for the victim than the offender... :-/
True, but then you would get an audience the size of iRacing, and when you have bet the farm on on-line esport and effectively removed single player you can't do that unless you want to destroy the brand.
They honestly also need some form of reporting system.
This is needed both for racing conduct and offensive things in general. I am starting to see liveries with offensive phrases (one said **** Y*u in large letters on the back bumper for example).
To mimimize the need for human judging they could always set a reporting threshold (i.e. get more than 10 reports / time unit = manual review).
They wont be able to manage all those reports.Can you imagine how many people are going to report others?If they do that then they only have to review 24/7 and do nothing else.
Plus I think that "ban" is not going to happen in GTS ever.
I know its a GTS thread, however the conversation was about the potential for a PC2 style system in GTS.
/.../
Penalties don't always result from contact.
/.../
I think you may be reading more into the post you quoted that it actually says.
To get the most points you can to be used in the next step in the series, FIA races become weekly soon, whatever that brings with it regarding points I don't know, groups? Like a proper championship table with players grouped on points? I don't know, but keep at it, you only need 3 good results, the best 3 count only.I've only done one race in GTS since last Tuesday and that was a Nations Cup race on Saturday. I did well enough moved up from 12th to 6th. However, I did have two idiot drivers with an SR of S, same as me, use me as their brake by divebombing me from way back on the inside of a corner. They both ended taking themselves off trying something similar with others. Right now I see no reason to even but the GTS disk in the tray. The game needs much more for us to do in game.
And I read it differently based on the sentence and paragraph structure.Nope.
It seems like you're staring at a marginal Project Cars 2 reference, as if it were a red blanket. If you go back to the root you'll find that the conversation is about how to penalise players ramming their way through the field, and specifically (A) what to do and (B) how to identify the guilty party. The poster proposed the following change:
Proposed change
(A) Return the position
(B) if the overtaking car receives a penalty
And gave an example from Project Cars 2:
Example
(A) Return the position
(B) if the overtaking car goes off the track
The proposed change was to use the same consequence (A) as in PC2 (which I totally agree with), but another way to identify the guilty party, namely one that - unlike the PC2 example - would apply to ramming, which is the issue that we are discussing. The problem with the proposed (B) is that it would encourage people to defend their position by ramming the overtaking car, since it then would have to return the position.