- 6,946
- United Kingdom
Still not been able to see it looking like white yet after seeing on a few more displays.
Got 0, yey, I guess.I think all you blue/black folk need to calibrate your screens and also try this out.
My result:
This “buzz” or whatever you may call it is far from stupid/pointless from my perspective. Color fidelity is part of my work. I’ve been shooting (GretagMacbeth) X-Rite’s ColorCheckers for quite some time now, spend countless hours trying to manage multiple visual chains (print/video/film), fine tune 8/16/32 bit pictures with almost infinitesimal control, analyze samples with spectrophotometers, vector-scopes,...
At this point, 38,6% of the people who voted in this thread perceive the dress as White with gold stripes. That’s far from a negligible minority and suggests this could go well beyond colour blindness or uncalibrated displays, IMO.
And while environment will indeed influence the perception of colours, what really confuses me is that the referred gold and white colors are "somehow" present in the immediate neighbourhood of the dress (hot spot and gradient on the floor). Now if the dress is indeed perceived white and gold, what value/colour do you attribute to the surrounding?
By accounting for the overexposed yellowish lighting? There was no confusion in my mind what color the physical object is. My wife said, "come over here and tell me what the colors of this dress are." She didn't give me choices. I immediately said, "blue and black." The "black" in the image obviously isn't black, but it was apparent to me that the dress itself had black material. As for the blue part of the image...How are people to say what colour the physical object is from a photograph where the colours are not the same?
The amount of saturation is enough for me to see a hue very clearly. It's not the same as the actual dress or a better photo of it, but believe me, to my eyes it's still totally blue. The background makes no difference -- I'm not seeing the illusion that @SlipZtrEm posted, which is something I also thought of -- and I've looked at it on multiple displays. My laptop screen is even under-saturated and washed out, which bothers me on GTPlanet (the new color scheme washes out to a solid page of white) and when I'm working with images....Do you see royal blue in the image, or just bits that are bluish?
And yet the blue value (188) and the saturation (29%) is low. The hue value of 226 is indeed blue (blue peaks at 240), but the low saturation and high brightness pushes it toward the brighter and whiter end. The indicator is well to the left of and above the centre.
Compare to a point sample of the promotional shot. I get 3344d8, with blue at 216 (H at 234 - very blue) and saturation at 76%.
It does make you wonder what the point is in dropping thousands for a colour managed workflow when a sizeable proportion of people will be seeing something very different! Heck, even getting something 'close enough' with a cheap calibrator would be fine for 90% of viewing.
Same situation with me almost to the T, except the roles where reversed.By accounting for the overexposed yellowish lighting? There was no confusion in my mind what color the physical object is. My wife said, "come over here and tell me what the colors of this dress are." She didn't give me choices. I immediately said, "blue and black." The "black" in the image obviously isn't black, but it was apparent to me that the dress itself had black material. As for the blue part of the image...
I'm not so sure. My favorite color happens to be orange, yet I saw blue and black. My other half saw white and off-orange, her favorite color is green.I honestly think there's a biological explanation here, and it's fascinating. I wonder if there's a higher incidence of people whose favorite color is blue (like me) among the population that sees blue, possibly because they're more sensitive to it.
There seems to be more people out of the U.S talking about it here, though.Meanwhile in America
There seems to be more people out of the U.S talking about it here, though.
But which one would be pass and which would be not-pass?This should be part of the test for becoming a Pilot.
This should be part of the test for becoming a Pilot.
The ones not fighting over it.But which one would be pass and which would be not-pass?
They usually do. TVs come from the factory with settings designed to grab your attention in the store. Most of them are a bit over-saturated and over-bright....and stuff that looks fine on my laptop turns garishly saturated on a TV.
The settings are usually pretty horrible when it comes to the quality of the picture.They usually do. TVs come from the factory with settings designed to grab your attention in the store. Most of them are a bit over-saturated and over-bright.
That was pretty much my take. The crappy photo I saw first looked light blue and gold (so I went for 'other' in the poll above) but it was quite apparent the pic was overexposed and the colour balance was way off.By accounting for the overexposed yellowish lighting? There was no confusion in my mind what color the physical object is. My wife said, "come over here and tell me what the colors of this dress are." She didn't give me choices. I immediately said, "blue and black." The "black" in the image obviously isn't black, but it was apparent to me that the dress itself had black material. As for the blue part of the image...
The specific instance I was thinking of was on someone else's HDTV via the HDMI output, so they were probably factory settings, yes.They usually do. TVs come from the factory with settings designed to grab your attention in the store. Most of them are a bit over-saturated and over-bright.