The Earth is Flat?

  • Thread starter Corsa
  • 1,439 comments
  • 65,655 views
Yes, he has said that, but he's also elaborated on that.

The sphere is actually oblate, so that the distance through the center from pole to pole is less than that from two points along the equator. The difference is small, but it's there. @TheGeologist could probably shed more light on the following than I, but I'm given to understand that Earth's composition isn't singular, and some areas between the core and the surface aren't as dense as others, a difference that results in gravity acting upon the mineral composition thereby resulting in variances that go beyond geological formations such as mountains.

Citing comments out of context is demonstrative of a weak argument.

I'm not quite sure what you are referring to? Are you asking about the composition of the mantle? I haven't kept up with the conversation, not sure what is going on lol
 
I'm not quite sure what you are referring to? Are you asking about the composition of the mantle?
Presumably anything and everything between the core and the surface, which would include the mantle.
 
So let me guess, you want me to drink bleach? Deep inside right?

Sorry if anyone is offended by me.

:lol:

Don't flatter yourself. The only ones you're offending are all your teachers you have had in your life, and more importantly, yourself.

You can't fool me that you look in the mirror and tell yourself "the Earth is flat and I feel smart for saying it".
 
It's just an example of the things globe proponents people say to someone thats not fully committed to one side though other people.
Fixed that for you. Even then, it strikes me as something incredibly immature. Also, not even remotely along the lines of things people have said here.
 
:lol:

Don't flatter yourself. The only ones you're offending are all your teachers you have had in your life, and more importantly, yourself.

You can't fool me that you look in the mirror and tell yourself "the Earth is flat and I feel smart for saying it".
that's part of my morning routine yes
 
Yes, he has said that, but he's also elaborated on that.

The sphere is actually oblate, so that the distance through the center from pole to pole is less than that from two points along the equator. The difference is small, but it's there. @TheGeologist could probably shed more light on the following than I, but I'm given to understand that Earth's composition isn't singular, and some areas between the core and the surface aren't as dense as others, a difference that results in gravity acting upon the mineral composition thereby resulting in variances that go beyond geological formations such as mountains.

Citing comments out of context is demonstrative of a weak argument.

The Principle of Horizontally tells us that layers of sediments deposited on the Earth's surface are originally deposited horizontally. If these sediments are undisturbed, then they will remain that way. That is why some areas like Indiana, USA are "flat as a pancake". The lithified sediments that have become rock are flat. When those sediments are disturbed (e.g. through actions of water, glaciers, volcanic events, earthquakes, folding, faulting, orogenic events etc) that can create elevation changes and creates landforms. Landforms are also created based on the lithology (rock type) as some rocks weather faster than others leading to positive and negative relief areas.

The reason I kept asking @quentin1974 about plate tectonics applies here. Since he never could provide evidence, I'd like to say what I've been wanting to say.

The theory of Plate Tectonics essentially states that our continents can move. Our continental crust varies a lot, but the average composition is considered a granodiorite. These rocks are less dense and essentially float over the Asthenosphere (a layer of the mantle).

The mantle has a lot of heterogeneity. One would think it is not possible to study the mantle because of it being too far down in the Earth. However it has been possible through various geophysical and geochemical techniques.

Geophysics - Major techniques of geophysics include 3D seismic tomography which is generated through S and P waves. These seismic waves are created from seismic activity like earthquakes. When an earthquake happens, it releases off S and P waves which (to make a long story short) are affected in their speed and direction when they go through different medium and densities (solid, semi-solid, liquid etc).

An example of what this data might look like is seen below. This figure (Kennett, B. L. N., Tkalčić, H, 2008) depicts the percent perturbation, meaning the amount of variation found in S wave speed. This is important because this means the physical and chemical properties of the medium have changed, which allow boundaries to be set in place i.e. core-mantle boundary.

3.jpg


Geochemical - Geochemical data is much more limited because it is dependent on finding physical samples of igneous rock at the surface which have erupted or otherwise ended up at the surface of the Earth. Because these rocks are solidified and found at the surface, they are best used to understand previous compositions and mantellic evolution.

Geochemical and Geophysical studies have brought a wealth of information to mantellic evolution. By using 3D seismic tomography, geologists have found distinct zones in the mantle being able to better understand mantle circulation (both upwelling and subduction), along with mantle composition. Mantle chemistry can rarely be tested at the surface of the Earth, but through seismic waves, their responses to different changes in composition (i.e. speed change, direction change) are indicative of differences in the media.

These upwelling and downwelling cycles play important roles in the movement of our continents. These cycles, which are well documented, depend on a spherical Earth. Where is the core on a flat planet? What happens to the mantle? We know a mantle exists, look what is happening in Hawaii, that's hotspot volcanism! That lava is coming from somewhere...

I've googled it, and I can't find an answer as to how FEers explain how plate tectonics can happen on a flat Earth. The continents are most certainly moving. This has been verified by satellites, fossil evidence, the fact that earthquakes exist, and the fact that India smashed into Asia to create the Himalayas. If continents don't move, where the hell do mountains come from? Where do earthquakes come from? They can't move on a flat Earth. They move because we live on a round Earth.

Source:
Kennett, B. L. N., Tkalčić, H, 2008, Dynamic Earth: crustal and mantle heterogeneity, Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 55, p. 265-279.

Now lets stop this nonsensical discussion...

/thread.
 
Last edited:
perturbation, meaning the amount of variation found in S wave speed.
I believe if you look again, you'll see that this is the second definition, the first being:

perturbation - How annoyed you are (on a 1-10 scale) at having to explain fairly simple concepts repeatedly.

I'm at about a 3 but could jump to a 12 at any moment.

pain-scale2.jpg
 
TB
I believe if you look again, you'll see that this is the second definition, the first being:

perturbation - How annoyed you are (on a 1-10 scale) at having to explain fairly simple concepts repeatedly.

I'm at about a 3 but could jump to a 12 at any moment.

pain-scale2.jpg

Bruh, I just 'edujmacated' this entire forum, and all you got for me is an alternative definition for a word? It works as I used it as well :lol:

And you didn't even give me a like for all my hard work :(
 
@TheGeologist that was a great deal more than I was expecting, though I gather you wanted to wax geologically in response to others' comments, and hey, I more or less got the answer I was seeking; that the mantle's composition is heterogenous (sounds naughty).

One thing sparked curiosity, though:


The Principle of Horizontally tells us that layers of sediments deposited on the Earth's surface are originally deposited horizontally.
This is a part of planet formation, and I have a vague idea of how we currently believe our planet was formed.

I'm curious, however, what belief flat Earthers generally hold regarding [flat] planet manifestation.


I've held some mantle. It was green.
Peridotite (if I recall correctly)?

My wife's birthstone is peridot and I got a brief geology lesson while looking at jewelry a number of years ago--boy was that buried deep, and it would have stayed buried had the color not been mentioned.
 
@TheGeologist that was a great deal more than I was expecting, though I gather you wanted to wax geologically in response to others' comments, and hey, I more or less got the answer I was seeking; that the mantle's composition is heterogenous (sounds naughty).

I've had this discussion planned in the back of my head for a while. No one would challenge the plate tectonic aspect, so I figured it would be good to mention while answering your question. Besides, this topic badly needed scientific data, rather than random youtube links and handwaving.

One thing sparked curiosity, though:

This is a part of planet formation, and I have a vague idea of how we currently believe our planet was formed.


I'm curious, however, what belief flat Earthers generally hold regarding [flat] planet manifestation.

I'd love to hear what they think regarding this. Unfortunately, no one here who is arguing for FE has any actual data, whether real or factitious. Its all armchair speak on the FE side.
 
Sounds like anti-vaxxers. I wonder if there's a lot of crossover.

We're born to believe the Earth is flat. We are vaccinated to think it is round. They slyly include it with other vaccines.

Those damn commies want to give us autism and make us think the Earth is round!

*This is sarcasm*
 
Last edited:
I think I just wasted 2 hours of my life and 19% of my battery reading the 400 posts in the last 2 days....
 
Flat Earth has nothing whatever to do with geology, geography or any kind of objective truth. It is strictly a free speech issue, and yet another minor drawback of postmodernism.
 
@WhiteFlight1 this is probably a stupid question and already answered or an answer that is obvious if I read between the lines but are you a 100% flat earth believer or are you somewhere in the middle and don't know what to believe?


Question answered: I just read your post.
 
Last edited:
Back