- 44
- blackhole522
GT4's car list was good, but then it was the year 2004. GT5's car list is already outdated![]()
Yes exactly, that's what bothers me. There aren't many recent cars....
GT4's car list was good, but then it was the year 2004. GT5's car list is already outdated![]()
Supra RZ is standard..???
Well at least tom's supra is a premium thank god...
Supra RZ is standard..???
Well at least tom's supra is a premium thank god...
So you mind something like this, that list have 46 cars, this 12, taken the first year model.
S Honda S2000 ‘99
S Honda S2000 LM Race Car
S Honda CIVIC SiR-II (EG) ‘91
S Mazda MX-5 1800 RS (NB, J) ‘00
S Mitsubishi GTO SR ‘95
S Mitsubishi GTO Twin Turbo ‘95
S Mitsubishi GTO Twin Turbo MR ‘95
S Mitsubishi 3000GT MR (J) ‘95
S Mitsubishi 3000GT SL (J) ‘95
S Mitsubishi 3000GT SR (J) ‘95
S Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4 (J) ‘98
S Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4 Turbo (J) ‘95
Edit: i also think is unnecessary
Can't wait to drive this premium Suzuki! ^_^
![]()
http://jaysys.us/RageFace.png[/I MG]
Lol jk, I am okay with the car list, too many Nissans and Toys though. :( No Plymouth GTX? Oh well I swear I saw the Chaparrals returning :D[/QUOTE]
Can you act like a douche on another forum please?
![]()
Premium^ ??
![]()
Standard^ ??
...Does not compute.![]()
The Bugatti is Standard?! ...![]()
I'm still having trouble comprehending why they made any "new" standards at all. It just seems like an odd decision.
that little Suzi is Premium? Haha.. oh dear.
What gets me though, is that no matter what they do people always have something to complain about. I'm over the fact some of my favorite cars aren't Premium, I'm going to enjoy the game and every aspect of it.
Well, both of the Countachs are supposedly Standard as well, so who knows what they were thinking.Exactly. Any way possible that was a misprint? Especially considering it's a Veyron we are talking about as well.
Not sure if that's directed at me, I wasn't complaining as much as confused as why a new modeled car would be standard level, in addition to it being the Veyron.
I'm still having trouble comprehending why they made any "new" standards at all. It just seems like an odd decision.
The GT4/GTPSP cars were then simply transferred over to GT5 to save time, money, and boost car count, is my guess. There is both a Standard and Premium Enzo; it was obviously modeled twice, on two separate occasions. Once for GTPSP and then again for GT5 as a premium. The standard Enzo will probably show up in the used car lot.
Very confusing choices indeed, but still, I'd rather have two standard Countachs than no Countachs at all. They even sounded quite decent in GTPSP with a good pair of headphones.
Exactly. Any way possible that was a misprint? Especially considering it's a Veyron we are talking about as well.
Amid all the whining, with the release date drawing near, I fell there's no better time to say this, for the good of all GTers. And presumptous or not, I'd appreciate if a mod would make a sticky topic out of this.
PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT
No matter how disappointed you are with GT5's car list, track list, or looming threat of no DLC, please try to keep immature whining and omnicidal RAEG to a minimum.
This does not mean you can't voice disappointment or mourn the absence of certain things. In fact, it may even have an effect, since Kaz and PD do watch forums. BUT, if you want to have any effect at all, you must state your demands in a CALM and LEVEL HEADED manner. If you act like a spoiled brat on Christmas morning, you will come across as presumptous, demanding fools, hardly worth trying to please. And you probably won't get your wish. You may even convince Kaz to abandon GT or give us a half-🤬 job on GT6. If you do get your wish, it will be done grudgingly. Either way, Kaz will be more inclined to listen to us if we can demonstrate some kind of a thought process. If we can show well-thought-through and reasonably planned-out ideas, it will get us a lot farther than shouting vague demands for "MORE TRACKS!" or "DLC PLZ!!!!!!111111111".
For everyone's sake, be CALM AND REASONABLE when asking for additional content. Thank you for your attention.