- 24,553
- Frankfort, KY
- GTP_FoolKiller
- FoolKiller1979
The further complication I have with buying into this as any kind of nearby crisis is that the ODAC report is refuting a BP report. While BP's main business is in oil they have hedged their bets in research of all kinds of alternative fuel sources. Sure, creating panic isn't the way they should go, so predicting the same as ODAC isn't ideal, but they are sending money out the door in research for other things than oil. With that in mind BP's best benefit would not be in extending out their prediction, but rather shaving 5-10 years from it. It isn't enough to create panic, but it is enough to make it seem like alternative fuel research needs to move faster. And we all know that governments respond to crisis with money. BP could maneuver this in a way to raise oil prices and receive funding for their research.
Instead, they moved it into a direction that doesn't quite make sense if they are lying.
The other thing I find questionable, is that with how BP's review is compiled compared to the article's claims. It is a statistical review and the accusation is that all the various companies and countries to provide statistical data are not being truthful. That would require quite a conspiracy between multiple governments and corporations. Out of all these groups of people not one has blown the whistle with convincing evidence?
Instead, they moved it into a direction that doesn't quite make sense if they are lying.
The other thing I find questionable, is that with how BP's review is compiled compared to the article's claims. It is a statistical review and the accusation is that all the various companies and countries to provide statistical data are not being truthful. That would require quite a conspiracy between multiple governments and corporations. Out of all these groups of people not one has blown the whistle with convincing evidence?