The Le Mans General Discussion Thread

freshseth83
It was the ACO who gave the Viper it's blessing to run it's 8.0 liter V10! They should abolish the rule of displacement that way it won't be a 'waiver'.

If they do that, then Ferrari and Porsche will be way behind
 
Ferrari has bigger engines they can use if needed but they are fast even without large displacement. Porsche is screwed if the displacement rules open up not like Porsche was even a threat anyway. They need a new car yesterday, hopfully the 991 RSR is faster than the old 997.
 
I think thats what they need to do with cars like viper and vette using bigger engines. They could also do what lmp is doing and limit fuel then bigger engines might not be such a good idea.
 
The ACO just makes things more complicated than it really should be. GT racing should be about having as many different solutions packed into one grid.

Have a rotary? Cool. Have an N/A V12? Awesome. Have a turbo-4? Legit.

So long as your engine doesn't go over this number, then you can jump in.

The problem with waivers is that it makes your original regulations seem powerless from the get-go and it introduces automotive politics into the realm of fair competition. On top of that, making waivers only seem to make other teams spend more to offset any performance hindrance they perceive in comparison to the waiver entitled car.
 
Last edited:
http://rebellion-racing.com/121205.html# Rebellion confirm a Full-season ALMS entrant, 2 at Sebring, still working on the WEC.

Sounds like Rebellion have had enough of being overshadowed by the manufacturer teams. I dont blame them. LMP1 giants Audi and Toyota want to win, and dont have as much money as, say, Strakka. If the WEC wants to gain any traction in LMP1, Honda need to jump feet-first and start supporting Strakka and Muscle Milk the same way Audi supports Joest, and Toyota supports Oreca.
 
I'm just glad We actually have a actual LMP1 battle and not a "Whenever Dyson doesn't break" battle. Sure Muscle Milk hasn't goen without trouble themselfs, but they were more like temporary glitches.
 
Dyson were quite of the pace this year though. If the Honda had half as many issues, it would have been over rather quickly.

That finish at Road America though... as close as it was, another lap and they would have had him. It's almost as if Muscle Milk wanted to engineer close finishes.

If Dyson get their act together, a 3-way battle would look pretty awesome this season.

And I want them to hurry up and finalise the LMP2 entrants. Conquest and Level 5 (If it's as close as last year) should still be fairly close though.


In other news: Audi are so confident in their 2013 car that they spent the time to design some furniture.
 
Last edited:
hawkeye122
If they do that, then Ferrari and Porsche will be way behind

sumbrownkid
The ACO just makes things more complicated than it really should be. GT racing should be about having as many different solutions packed into one grid.

Have a rotary? Cool. Have an N/A V12? Awesome. Have a turbo-4? Legit.

So long as your engine doesn't go over this number, then you can jump in.

The problem with waivers is that it makes your original regulations seem powerless from the get-go and it introduces automotive politics into the realm of fair competition. On top of that, making waivers only seem to make other teams spend more to offset any performance hindrance they perceive in comparison to the waiver entitled car.

Totally agree. I don't know why the ACO don't setup the engines displacements to give V8s and V10s and regulate the others, it doesn't make sense to me. If your running a Viper GTS-R with a 8.4L and it's competition is the RSR 911. Should you try and give the team say Flying Lizard the ability to increase the displacement for more HP and ft-lbs of the flat-6, plus an option for a turbo/supercharged unit to make it fair?

And I like your idea brownkid. If Mazda has a rotary 26B and it qualifies, it legit. If Jaguar, Nissan, Aston and BMW are running their motors and they followed the rules and got the power to compete with the Viper. It's legit. No problems, and it's a fair race. Am I right or?
 
Totally agree. I don't know why the ACO don't setup the engines displacements to give V8s and V10s and regulate the others, it doesn't make sense to me. If your running a Viper GTS-R with a 8.4L and it's competition is the RSR 911. Should you try and give the team say Flying Lizard the ability to increase the displacement for more HP and ft-lbs of the flat-6, plus an option for a turbo/supercharged unit to make it fair?

And I like your idea brownkid. If Mazda has a rotary 26B and it qualifies, it legit. If Jaguar, Nissan, Aston and BMW are running their motors and they followed the rules and got the power to compete with the Viper. It's legit. No problems, and it's a fair race. Am I right or?

I believe they did give the Lizards a little more power this past year.

Does the air restricter give you slightly better fuel economy?
 
Does the air restricter give you slightly better fuel economy?

By itself it doesn't, the programing done in compensation to the use of the restrictor may or may not result in better fuel economy.
 
http://rebellion-racing.com/121205.html# Rebellion confirm a Full-season ALMS entrant, 2 at Sebring, still working on the WEC.

Sounds like Rebellion have had enough of being overshadowed by the manufacturer teams. I dont blame them. LMP1 giants Audi and Toyota want to win, and dont have as much money as, say, Strakka. If the WEC wants to gain any traction in LMP1, Honda need to jump feet-first and start supporting Strakka and Muscle Milk the same way Audi supports Joest, and Toyota supports Oreca.

Doesn't even matter, they (Rebellion) had 6 wins amongst the privateers out of 8 rounds in the WEC. They're the team to beat in that class, not Strakka. 👍
 
freshseth83
Doesn't even matter, they (Rebellion) had 6 wins amongst the privateers out of 8 rounds in the WEC. They're the team to beat in that class, not Strakka. 👍

But they aren't recognized as a different class. They don't get to make headlines or anything because of the manufacturers teams
 
They use air restrictors, which limit the horsepower anyway.

It's not power that's a problem really, it's the torque. If you have a 4.0 Litre flat six Porsche and an 8l Viper V10 both with ~485bhp the bigger engine will always be stronger, which is why the GT2/GTE 'Vette suddenly made all the GTE stuff look slow in the straights when it first arrived.
 
They could always use the good old weight penalty system to even things out a bit, but even then, it has its faults.

In the Viper's case, its displacement does mean it makes a lot more torque than all the others, but it doesn't rev as high as say, the Porsches or Ferraris, which means it isn't peaky, and can pull itself out of tight corners with ease, without having to rev to the stratosphere. But I'm pretty sure an 8.2l V10 consumes a bit more fuel than a 4.0l Flat-6. Not so much a factor on a 2hr sprint, and quite a big one during a 24hr race.
 
Saw the pics on Facebook this morning. I thought it was going to be butt ugly with the big wing, but it is HOT.
 
The rear end is hideous, the lights and badging don't work on the race car.
 
All that is correct Ross, but the Lizards are doing GTC next year.

I'm eager to see how the GTE version differs from the Cup car.
 
All that is correct Ross, but the Lizards are doing GTC next year.

I'm eager to see how the GTE version differs from the Cup car.

Ahh, I didn't know they were doing GTC next year. My bad! And same, hopefully they'll be nice and wide like this years one.

So how come they're moving to GTC?
 
All that is correct Ross, but the Lizards are doing GTC next year.

I'm eager to see how the GTE version differs from the Cup car.

Technically, you kinda already can:

991_gt3_r-1.jpg


991_gt3-r-2.jpg
 
Ah. I heard about Porsche pulling support from teams but I didn't know that Flying Lizards were going to GTC. I guess I should pay more attention. :dunce:
 
Back