Maybe you should drop howard an email then and show them how to build a winning LM car.It doesn't have a "broken" issue, it has an issue in the fact it's gutless. The whole package has been designed terribly.
How can you see a car that's been specifically designed to be faster in a straight line, and that alone, to be working correctly if it's actually worse in a straight line?
It doesn't have a "broken" issue, it has an issue in the fact it's gutless. The whole package has been designed terribly.
How can you see a car that's been specifically designed to be faster in a straight line, and that alone, to be working correctly if it's actually worse in a straight line?
You could take the attitude down a peg.Maybe you should drop howard an email then and show them how to build a winning LM car.
Because when a car's one sole purpose is being faster, and it's working against it, then there's an issue.A similar question of knowledge can be posed to you. How the hell do you know the car is not working properly after a short outing? Gutless isn't an aerodynamic measurement I'm afraid... However sector times say differently, you seem a bit eager to cash your chips on an Audi defeat when you might want to be a bit patient.
The top speed should make them look very, very closely at the way they've gone in terms of design.They aren't hitting the limiter, I'm pretty sure from the display we saw they still had some revs left to rev to.
Even in quali they were revving higher changing through the gears than they were at the end of the straights which should show they're not hitting the limiter. Audi aren't that stupid.
They must have had very good reason behind it, and huge confidence in their choices, but I don't see why they chose cornering pace over top speed. It seems very un-Audi like.Probably due to their 2MJ Hybrid System.
You could take the attitude down a peg.
In this case, it needs more power? It's pretty flipping obvious it's never going to survive at Le Mans.
Because when a car's one sole purpose is being faster, and it's working against it, then there's an issue.
The two issues are:
It has no straightline speed because of the power unit they've chosen. It makes up all the time in the corners, and that clearly isn't working.
The car that should have an advantage is doing worse. It's not showing what it should be.
The top speed should make them look very, very closely at the way they've gone in terms of design.
Toyota have played it safe this year, and it's paying off no end. I never thought i'd say this, but Audi have made a poor decision, and they seem to be getting nowhere.
PM sent.Link please. Thanks.
Because when a car's one sole purpose is being faster, and it's working against it, then there's an issue.
The two issues are:
It has no straightline speed because of the power unit they've chosen. It makes up all the time in the corners, and that clearly isn't working.
The car that should have an advantage is doing worse. It's not showing what it should be.
I don't think its bad in a straight line so not everyone but i await to see your post with the trap speeds for it.I clearly know that the car is crap in a straight line, because everybody knows it.
I'm sorry, do you really think i'm as big an idiot to not understand aerodynamics?It's making up all the time in the corner because it has better down force and mechanical grip there and so there is a trade off due to that when it comes to the straight line speed. I say this as a guess and a somewhat educated one.
The low downforce Toyotas are able to corner faster, and with more stability than the high downforce Audis. I that isn't a slow car, I await to see what is.I don't think its bad in a straight line so not everyone but i await to see your post with the trap speeds for it.
The others were turned way down in practice 1:fastest in p1 and 5 mph difference in practice 2 doesn't look that "crap".
In the end, it's race pace that matters, not who's holding back in practice. It's in full trim that they are struggling badly. They have lots of work to do before Le Mans!There is a considerable difference in maximum speeds between the LMP1 cars here at Spa. The No. 14 Porsche 919 Hybrid was fastest in the speed traps with a top speed of 311.2 km/h. The two Toyota TS040s and the second Porsche all topped at 308.6 km/h. The long-tail version of the Audi was fifth fastest with a top speed of 302.5; the two regular cars only managed 288.0 and 285.7 km/h. At Silverstone the two Audis were 30 km/h off the pace in the speed traps.