And I quote:
Obviously they are not running at full power (pretty much half) or with all four wheels powered under acceleration like they had planned. That could be 20 seconds right there. They have the speed down the straights.
I personally see this program as one of those that changes history and re-writes rules. They're not to that point yet, but when they get this thing running the way it's supposed to...........look out.
It was testing, not all teams run the same programs, especially when they are at wildly different stages of development. We will see what the Nissan achieves in qualifying in little over a week's time. All things going to plan, I reckon we'll see them well under 3.25.000... that's a conservative estimate as well as that's about 9-10 seconds slower than the expected fastest time for the other P1 cars.
And an excerpt from an article I previously linked. And I quote:
Darren Cox has predicted that the Nissan GT-R LM NISMOs will be "significantly faster" than the LMP2s despite the delays in the project and a downgrading of the car's hybrid system into the two megajoule class.
"What did they qualify at last year, a 3m37s? We will be way ahead of that," he told AUTOSPORT.
"There have been a lot of predictions on social media that are completely wrong.
"We have a time that our simulations tell us we can do, but it is not a target and we are not going to say what it is."
The gap to the fastest P1s is still more than 20 seconds and it will likely be the same in race trim too. Credibility is earned on promises and predictions being delivered on. If a few of the Nissan supporters could just say something to the effect of "Yeah the LM-GTR doesn't seem like it will ever be competitive with the other LMP1s, but let's wait for the program to see its course just to see how fast this concept can eventually become. It's cool to see a new approach anyway." That would be a massive breath of fresh air. The defiant arguing with every post about the Nissan on the other hand.........
Just let it be criticized for now. Eventually nobody will care about it and we'll move on to the next thing. Nissan will be back next year anyway. And it shouldn't be any surprise the car is slow. I'd like to see it do well too, but there's a reason most top-flight racing cars have their engines behind the driver and primarily driving the rear wheels. Engineers have known this for decades and I'm pretty sure the laws of physics have not changed since then.
I applaud Nissan and the people there for taking a risk on an unproven concept, but at some point you have to accept the reality for what it is. It's not entirely unreasonable to classify the car as an LMP2 right now since it's running without the hybrid system, so I guess it could be seen as a small victory that one car is competitive with the LMP2 class. But supposing the car reaches its most evolved state at some point in the future, how is it supposed to reach a laptime that is competitive with the other P1 cars?
Let's assume the car attains an 8 MJ hybrid system next year and a rear-wheel drive system. The hardware for both of these systems will need to be integrated into the chassis and that will inevitably take up space that air is flowing freely through right now. The hybrid system will also have a reasonable cooling requirement. All of these things add up to more total drag, and the whole car was created around a low-drag concept so this is effectively reducing the car's biggest competitive advantage. With all of these factors adding up, the Nissan MIGHT break a 3:25 in its most evolved form in qualifying trim. Whether it can do that and reliably run for 24 hours too ............ it does not seem likely.
Basically the only way I see this car ever being competitive for a win is if it can quadruple stint its tires AND go an 2 laps longer than the other LMP1s before needing gas.