Man I wish I could go.
F Alfa Romeo. I mean they have romeo in their name. Pssh what the hell kind of car company is that making stupid heavy roadsters. Why don't they just go out of business already.Mazda wanted it around 2200lbs but had announced that they wouldn't be getting it that low. So I doubt it's less than that number.
Nobody has any idea what it actually looks like...I feel like this is the first miata that doesnt really look much like its previous model because they said it will share the model with Alfa Romeo. I mean come on....
I'm not sure how sarcastic you're being here, but it might be worth pointing out that Alfa Romeo's most recent sports car offering weighs about the same as the NA Miata, at least in Europe...F Alfa Romeo. I mean they have romeo in their name. Pssh what the hell kind of car company is that making stupid heavy roadsters. Why don't they just go out of business already.
The ND has been compromised from the start and I'm not very happy about it.
So your friend is the one responsible for the pathetic "sport" suspension Bilsteins on the NC...address please?I have a friend at bilstein (who is working on this car) saying the weight will be around 2000lbs. If so... excite
I feel like this is the first miata that doesnt really look much like its previous model because they said it will share the model with Alfa Romeo. I mean come on....
If we're talking compromise it may also be worth pointing out that the Alfa 4C is about 200 lbs heavier in the U.S. than it is in Europe because you guys apparently want a car filled with all sorts of unnecessary crap. And that Mazda will have to design this roadster to meet the world's strictest safety standards, those in the U.S, thereby making it heavier. In other words, it's all your fault. Yours, Keef
The entire thing is made of carbon fiber too. The NA wasn't. And the Alfa doesn't have standard air conditioning either.I'm not sure how sarcastic you're being here, but it might be worth pointing out that Alfa Romeo's most recent sports car offering weighs about the same as the NA Miata, at least in Europe...
Hey, it's already been in the news that once Alfa got on board Mazda had to accomodate them. Mazda's original idea wasn't in line with what Alfa wanted - a bigger, heavier car. Mazda designed the original Miata specifically with the US market in mind and this new one would have been done so as well. When you design to the strictest standards you are able to optimize every detail. When you design to loose standard - Alfa's method - you then have to scramble to add things that weren't meant to be there, resulting in a ludicrous weight gain. Something, something, Lotus Elise. Get it right the first time and you don't have to take another stab.If we're talking compromise it may also be worth pointing out that the Alfa 4C is about 200 lbs heavier in the U.S. than it is in Europe because you guys apparently want a car filled with all sorts of unnecessary crap. And that Mazda will have to design this roadster to meet the world's strictest safety standards, those in the U.S, thereby making it heavier. In other words, it's all your fault. Yours, Keef
I know that but given that Fiat is working for this car too then it will probably look a bit like an Alfa or Fiat mixed with Mazda.Nobody has any idea what it actually looks like...
What did people think of the Ibuki concept?
Would be kinda cool if Madza did the retro route rather than their current design language which I don't see translating well to a roadster.
I think it's also been announced that neither car would look alike. Alfa will look completely different, it won't be anything like the FRS/BRZ twins.I know that but given that Fiat is working for this car too then it will probably look a bit like an Alfa or Fiat mixed with Mazda.
The NC was loosely styled off that car, doubt the next car will be.What did people think of the Ibuki concept?
Would be kinda cool if Madza did the retro route rather than their current design language which I don't see translating well to a roadster.
Well that's a relief....I think it's also been announced that neither car would look alike. Alfa will look completely different, it won't be anything like the FRS/BRZ twins.
So far I've not seen any actual evidence that Alfa (/Fiat, as I thought the sister car wasn't going to be an Alfa any more?) has actually compromised the project.Hey, it's already been in the news that once Alfa got on board Mazda had to accomodate them.
Please, no.
Care to elaborate? I haven't read much about it, really. I think all car companies need to stop the package nonsense.I mean, Mazda has done well with the 6. They've done well with the 3. But there seems to be near-universal panning of their new pricing structure when it comes to content. Can we just hope they've learned from it on this one?
I've always quite liked the Z3, but it hasn't aged particularly well. The first Z4 was grim as a roadster and hot as a coupe, and I'm still not sure whether I like the current one or not - not a huge fan of folding metal roofs, for one.Z3 is ugly. Z4 on the other hand...
Care to elaborate? I haven't read much about it, really. I think all car companies need to stop the package nonsense.
You can't get a 3s with a stick anymore? Well, ****. And here I thought I'd buy one if I could afford one.Mazda 3s with the 2.5L engine, which also requires the automatic.
In my humble opinion, these new Mazda tend to be a bit more premium in terms of styling and refinement than the competition, no? Sort of like Ford's pricing scheme.I understand that Mazda's margins are much more thin these days, and it helps control costs by producing cars with similar extras. But, man, I just want a middle range model with some nice wheels, an okay stereo system, and some basic creature comforts. I'm guessing the MX-5 might have an easier time with this given the kind of car it is out of the gate.