- 6,356
- Michigan
- DaveTheStalker
ShylockHolmesGot a link to proof of that? I find it very hard to believe that MS took over a billion dollar loss for the sole purpose of beating the launch of PS3, very hard to believe indeed.
Common knowledge dude. This is why they buckled and extended the warranties. Google.com is your link.
You don't think getting a jump on their primary completion has been beneficial? Do the math: how many XBL subs are there? How much does that cost? $50, well $60 now. That's a couple bucks I think. Name recognition, product placement in movies & tv shows (House on Monday), commercials where gaming may not be the focus but a controller is used, primary platform for things like Madden competitions. Get it now?
They are ruthless and will do anything to try to beat Sony.
I find it amazing that I can still play some PS2 games online. How many Xbox 1 games can you play online? Wow, that was a vicious thing to do to your consumer base to convince them to buy the new console.
If memory serves me right, the failure rate was independently calculated to be 67%.
Gotta spend money to make money. The Wii was/is the cheapest console to make. The 360 had profits from day one. The PS3 lost $200 for every console sold for, what, a year and a half to two years?
Yeah, real good American company; profits are king at any cost.