- 13,827
- Down under
So tell me then, why aren't multibillion dollar companies who first penned Submariners and Panerai's and Nighthawks and Khaki Pilots taking the manufacturers of 'look-a-likes' to court then if it is fraudulent? Is it because it isn't fraudulent? Or is it because you are wrong?Ramanujanjust omitting the brand of the watch you are 1:1 copying is as fraudulent as putting the wrong brand on a fake watch
My personal guess is the latter.
But why don't companies who are aware of other companies using their brand illegally take them to court then? Ohhhh that's right, they do, because it's illegal.
True, but as long as Mike gets the message it is worth it.
I get the message, but it is clear that you don't.
You are free to have your opinion, but if you were right, 3/4 of the watches in existence are fakes because they have design similarities to other watch. By your logic, once a design is penned (e.g. Rolex Submariner), no other watch can ever look anything like it. I'll be sure to email Bulova, Citizen, Seiko, Steinhart, Glycine, Hamilton, Tag Heuer and Omega that they are all making fake watches and are making the common man in the street criminals .
nealcropperAlso, mike, I feel as if I may have left here last time I posted with you thinking I was being a douche with you, I didn't mean it like that.
No worries, I can see you didn't intend it to come across that way - I appreciate the clarification though .
Thank you for granting me permission to do this. I could never have managed it without your assistance.RamanujanTime for Mike to shake hands.
Last edited: