So let me get this straight;
MS says Kinect is mandatory.
People (here especially) bitch and moan.
MS changes decision based on feedback; makes Kinect no longer needed.
People (here especially) bitch and moan.
And this is why I don't come in this thread, much.
Just because the PS4 may have more pre-orders doesn't automatically mean demand for the X1 is low. That's like saying that Pepsi is in big trouble and better change something fast because Coke is selling more than them. No, it's ridiculous. Pepsi is doing fine and so is Microsoft and their Xbox One.
If there's nothing I can say to convince you that there won't be a major price drop for the X1 within the next year, then I guess you'll just have to wait it out and see for yourself. Just don't be surprised when it doesn't happen.
It's just PR talk, all companies are guilty of it. Just check the latest slab from Sony when it comes to GT6.
So let me get this straight;
MS says Kinect is mandatory.
People (here especially) bitch and moan.
MS changes decision based on feedback; makes Kinect no longer needed.
People (here especially) bitch and moan.
And this is why I don't come in this thread, much.
It's going to change everything.
Everything!
Until they change it all back a week later. I never thought that a gaming console could actually become Bipolar.
Gtplanet sometimes.
Basically MS are not going to have enough Xbox's on launch for the countries that get it in November.Wow .
Basically MS are not going to have enough Xbox's on launch for the countries that get it in November.
Xbox Wire StaffFans of Season Passes now have another reason to look forward to Xbox One with the Season Pass Guarantee program. With Season Pass Guarantee, you can purchase a Season Pass for a participating Xbox 360 title and automatically receive access to download the equivalent Xbox One Season Pass.* Its simple.
Some of the biggest publishers, including Activision, Electronic Arts and Ubisoft, are lined up for the Season Pass Guarantee program, offering season pass content you cant find anywhere else for blockbuster titles in 2013 and 2014. Youll be able access exclusive season pass content on anticipated titles like Call of Duty: Ghosts and Battlefield 4 on both Xbox 360 and Xbox One.
They might release a version without the camera and it'll naturally be cheaper but it won't be $200 cheaper. No chance.
You also seem to be forgetting PS3 was originally $500/$600.
PS3 had blu-ray and that was alone was some 100$ 7yrs from now. Also cell processor was expensive. XO has nothing in it to justify that price both in terms of specs and design wise too, it is simply a big rectangular box.
On another note. Aren't the Kinect relatively cheap to produce? A Google search shows that the Kinect (original version) supposedly costs aproximately 56 dollars to make. The new version might have more advanced parts, but it's also fair to assume that they have streamlined production even further, which would make it cheaper.
So in short, i don't see how anyone can justify the additional 100 dollars/euros that you have to pay for the One.
Supposedly that's not quite true.
Also, MS have released some info about the steps they've taken to ensure the Xbone won't overheat.
And here's some good news for people who don't want to wait for the console to start playing new games. That plus the Gamestop offer where they'll give you $50 when you trade in a current gen title for the same title on the new consoles is good news for the impatient among us. (Edit: tree'd)
Now that we have some facts out of the way, we return to your regularly scheduled hate-train.
So, here's the thing: The link I posted was a statement by a MS employee who worked on the project and was speaking about development costs. How is that not a fact, or at least much closer to a fact than the speculation of some random guy (no offense) on the internet who knows next to nothing about the actual development of the product?Hopefully, you don't mean to include that first link in the facts department. If the Kinect was that expensive, you'd think Microsoft would state so officially. hell, they do love to inflate numbers. Just look at this recent statement from MS stating that they spent more than a hundred million dollars in designing the Xbox One controller. Link: http://www.gamespot.com/news/micros...illions-designing-xbox-one-controller-6412843
Yeah, as if.
Now of course I don't know if the link you posted about the production cost of the Kinect is true. Nor do I know if it does actually cost around 50 dollars to produce. All speculation. But I don't believe for one second that is costs more than the One itself. Hell, the fact that the majority of gamers seem to not be interested in using the Kinect, throwing that much money at it would seem like suicide.
Wasn't really directed at you, more at the thread in general.Ohh, and for the record. I don't hate the One. After all the policy reversals, it is starting to look like a good console. And if they drop the paywall and release a version without the Kinect, I might eventually pick it up. I do dislike Microsoft, for reasons that should be quite obvious. If Sony had attempted the same thing as MS did, I'd dislike them too.
If the Kinect was that expensive, you'd think Microsoft would state so officially.
Ah, I see. My mistake 👍 But you can't realistically separate development costs and production costs when you're bringing a product to market; you have to recover both of them. But I see what you were saying.JawehawkI wasn't talking about development cost, but production. I realise that the Kinect itself is an advanced piece of technology. And a well made one at that. But I, along with what seems to be the majority of consumers, aren't interested in it. Which is why I don't get the focus. It's something that mostly caters to the casual market, and that's completely fine. But they should leave it at that, and not force it on the more hardcore players.
It's as close as we're likely to get, unfortunately.JawehawkAnd seeing as the article mentioned that their source was an anonymous MS employee. In other words, it's not necessarily true. But it certainly could be.
+1 to this. We'll just have to see how it shakes out.JawehawkTo be honest, I dare not try to predict what MS will do in the future. Go back 3 months, and Microsoft and the Xbox One looked completely different that it does now. Don't get me wrong, amost all the changes made have been for the better, but it does make it hard to feel certain about anything currently being said and done by MS.
I agree. But at the same time, I don't... it costs money to provide that service, so it kinda makes sense that they would want to charge for it to try and make up some of the loss on it.JawehawkAs for the PS4 requiring PS Plus. Well, I absolutely hate that. And I don't think their reasons are fully justified. Why not just make online games free, while making all those extra features part of PS Plus. A lot of people would then buy Plus, but it would still leave us with the ability to use the games that we pay for fully.
NeowinWhile there was speculation that Microsoft was delaying the Xbox One launches in those countries due to shipment and supply issues , Microsoft's Xbox director of marketing Albert Penello told fans on the NeoGAF message board that was not the case. He stated:
Launch volumes are not really an issue. This was simply a software issue in terms of getting local language and voice support in the dash. It's pretty straightforward, but disappointing I know for people who are missing launch.