I don't know who Chris Harris is and I'm sure you yourself are not him. Mr cars are harder to drive irl. I know this, but not to the extent of how gt6 did handle before the patch. Like I already said, features such as braking oversteer are still present, just not to the same exaggerated extent. And when did I say high powered cars are easy to drive? You're presuming I think this way, please don'tThe handling of the MR was literally the only thing I liked about GT6. I guess I'm gong back to GT5.
Oh btw I think this is highly relevant in this thread: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect
You are not Chris Harris and high powered are not supposed to be easy to drive.
Gave up in the end and used a bentley speed 8, wow now thats a good car!! didn't change anything except brake bias and won easily ( dream car champ ) even though its the same pp 680!! Bentley was 4-6 seconds a lap faster with no handling problems.https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/conversations/audi-r8-lms-ultra-team-phoenix-simple-tune-fix.1538064/
Not sure if i remember correctly but are there not some stronger cars in those races ? (LMP, Group-C)
Of course its possible to win with the R8 but it takes a lot of "help" from the AI or using RS tires and tuning.
I would use a stock LMP on RH witout aids...
The weight transfer in MR's was exaggerated. Don't be arrogant and call everyone who had trouble with MR's an idiot who needs to learn to drive. Difficult is not 100% realism. If you honestly think a car that handled like the GT6 R8 could've safely competed IRL, you're mistaken.You mean it's easily controllable now for the people that couldn't handle it before. There should be a lot of braking oversteer in MR and RR cars. That's where the majority of the weight is and it wants to swap ends. That's what MR 's do. If people don't know how to handle it properly, they shouldn't complain and instead learn the proper technique it takes to drive MR. Now MR 's seem to have been dumbed down.
Gave up in the end and used a bentley speed 8, wow now thats a good car!! didn't change anything except brake bias and won easily ( dream car champ ) even though its the same pp 680!! Bentley was 4-6 seconds a lap faster with no handling problems.
The Audi r8 lms at 680pp is useless! And i had been looking forward this car?
Well it used to in gt5 but i guess its changed now maybe because of downforce not effecting pp level?pp don't tell much. (what is better for rally, a 600pp R8 LMS or a 600pp Audi S1 ?)
Using a R8 LMS against LMP and Group-C in LeMans would be futile IRL, only in GT with its awful AI/gameplay it is possible to come close to a "victory" with such a wrong car for the task.
Also a car that is tuned to higher pp is usally worse than a car that has same pp from start.
Stock R8=599pp , and its competetive against other 600pp touring cars.
pp do more damage then good IMHO, because people think same pp=same speed/laptime.
does not work this way
Some cars, this is true, others it works out. And I like this. It means that PD's physics engine is doing something right. In some other games, like a certain competitor, Civics and CRXs can be turned into Ferrari killers just by throwing money at them.pp do more damage then good IMHO, because people think same pp=same speed/laptime.
does not work this way
The weight transfer in MR's was exaggerated. Don't be arrogant and call everyone who had trouble with MR's an idiot who needs to learn to drive. Difficult is not 100% realism. If you honestly think a car that handled like the GT6 R8 could've safely competed IRL, you're mistaken.
I'm 14, so not a car, but I was professionally tutored in karts. After the update, the weight transfer feel on them seems slightly more like real life. The R8 may have been difficult IRL, but the way it was pre-1.03 was utterly lethal.Have you driven an MR in real life? Seriously, because If you have you wouldn't disagree with me. I never said difficulty was realism, so you can stop putting words in my mouth.
Try doing some research on how the R8 drove on debut. I don't come on these forums and make 🤬 up
This argument that the R8 was so horrible on its debut is becoming a bit boring.Have you driven an MR in real life? Seriously, because If you have you wouldn't disagree with me. I never said difficulty was realism, so you can stop putting words in my mouth.
Try doing some research on how the R8 drove on debut. I don't come on these forums and make 🤬 up
But that's exactly how cars work.Civics and CRXs can be turned into Ferrari killers just by throwing money at them.
I'm 14, so not a car, but I was professionally tutored in karts. After the update, the weight transfer feel on them seems slightly more like real life. The R8 may have been difficult IRL, but the way it was pre-1.03 was utterly lethal.
This argument that the R8 was so horrible on its debut is becoming a bit boring.
Yes you need lots of skill to drive such a machine in a race.
And yes the R8 in GT6 with stock setup can be driven very nicely if you have the skill and a wheel.
(Go in the Update 1.03 MR thread and download the replay from OdeFinn)
Edit: and he beat me again to it
No one here has driven the real one and compared it to other GT3's , so we can only guess.
For me there are 2 options:
PD knew exactly how the real R8 handled when it came out, they got all test data from the team and programmed it in their driving simulator with perfect physic model and the R8 in GT is exactly as difficult/easy to drive like the real one.
The physic model in GT is simplified (hardware limitation), PD don't have perfect raw data for every car.
With the Audis and some others there happens something in the process of "importing" that makes them act a bit strange compared to others. (Maybe the theory this thread is about is even true)
My guess is option 2, no big deal for me.
At least something is a challenge in this game, taming the R8 and the other "broken" MR's with setup work and improving my driving will keep me busy for a while.
I watch 24h races and ADAC GT Masters on TV, the R8's never looked more edgy then the others, also not remember them saying something about it in an interview.
I saw your replay, very impressive, very smooth, very constant.@BWX, if borked means good car then you are right
Well, yes and no. In real life, cars have lots of high performance parts added, but then they need to be tuned. Sometimes, the car is hard to drive at high speed if they aren't. In games, this is often less of a deal. Defaults are provided that make cars manageable, even pretty easy. I would prefer it if all cars in Gran Turismos were given defaults which made them pretty much solid racers, because I'm not a tuner ninja like some of the folk here. And what vexes me is how some cars in GT5 and 6 need careful tuning or they just seem like death traps.But that's exactly how cars work.
I didn't say it should handle like a kart. I can't see how you're defending the R8 - if it handled like pre-1.02 IRL, people would be dead. It would not be able to win things. I stand at Cascades at Oulton Park, which is a nice hard braking zone coming down from a slight drop. Not once have I ever seen an R8 GT3 even squirm under braking through there. Teams do not choose cars for being lethal under braking and not being able to take a corner at more than 30mph.Karts are a lot different than a full size MR car. Just because you were tutored in karts doesn't mean the same logic applies, or that the R8 should handle like a kart does.
I didn't say it should handle like a kart. I can't see how you're defending the R8 - if it handled like pre-1.02 IRL, people would be dead. It would not be able to win things. I stand at Cascades at Oulton Park, which is a nice hard braking zone coming down from a slight drop. Not once have I ever seen an R8 GT3 even squirm under braking through there. Teams do not choose cars for being lethal under braking and not being able to take a corner at more than 30mph.
At least it wasn't backwards. It may be twitchy IRL, but not that unstable.You compared your knowledge of karting to how the R8 handles, so you can see how that made me think you were comparing karts to full size MR cars. Many other cars have had bad handling characteristics on track that have raced. Just because the R8 had some bad handling doesn't mean teams won't run it. Teams choose cars based on their budget, relationships and alliances. Teams don't choose cars by what's the easiest to drive.
Also just because a car looks planted doesn't mean it is. Until you experience heavy braking from 100+mph you don't know what it feels like to have the car move around under braking.
The weight transfer in MR's was exaggerated. Don't be arrogant and call everyone who had trouble with MR's an idiot who needs to learn to drive. Difficult is not 100% realism. If you honestly think a car that handled like the GT6 R8 could've safely competed IRL, you're mistaken.
I didn't say it should handle like a kart. I can't see how you're defending the R8 - if it handled like pre-1.02 IRL, people would be dead. It would not be able to win things. I stand at Cascades at Oulton Park, which is a nice hard braking zone coming down from a slight drop. Not once have I ever seen an R8 GT3 even squirm under braking through there. Teams do not choose cars for being lethal under braking and not being able to take a corner at more than 30mph.