I was discussing this topic at a different site I go to. Here's some facts that were posted. Maybe you guys would like to read them. Again, no opinions, just facts.
Ninety-two percent of the world's countries have at least one official language. (Source: 2002 World Almanac, 2001 U.S. Bureau of the Census Estimates)
English is the sole official language in 31 nations. An additional 20 nations recognize English as one of two or more official languages. (Source: 2002 World Almanac, 2001 U.S. Bureau of the Census Estimates)
In 2000, 21.3 million U.S. residents (8.1 percent of the U.S. population) were met the definition of limited English proficient set by the U.S. Census, meaning that they spoke English "less than very well." Of these, 11.0 million, or 4.2 percent spoke English "not well" or "not at all" (Source: Census 2000)
The number of Americans who do speak English "not at all" jumped from 1.22 million in 1980 to 3.37 million in 2000, a 176 percent increase over 20 years (Source: U.S. Census)
California leads the nation in the number of limited English proficient persons, with 6.3 million, or one-fifth of the population of the Golden State. Texas is second with 2.7 million, followed by New York, Florida and Illinois. New Jersey, Arizona, Massachusetts, Georgia and Pennsylvania round out the top 10. (Source: U.S. Census)
Since 1980, the number of U.S. residents who are limited English proficient has more than doubled, from 10.2 million to 21.3 million. In 1980, fewer than 1-in-20 Americans struggled with English. Now, nearly 1-in-12 do. (Source: U.S. Census)
In 2000, 11.9 million U.S. residents lived in linguistically isolated households, meaning that no one in the household spoke English at home or spoke English "very well". This figure is up 54 percent from 7.7 million in 1990. In all, more than 1-in-25 households in the United States is linguistically isolated. (Source: Census 2000)
There are 322 languages spoken at home in the United States. Behind English, the most common languages are Spanish, French, Chinese, German, Tagalog, Vietnamese, Italian, Korean and Russian. (Source: Census 2000)
California has the most languages spoken at home of any state with 207. New York is second with 169, followed by Washington, Texas and Oregon. Pennsylvania, Florida, Illinois, New Jersey and Arizona round out the top 10 states. (Source: Census 2000)
English proficiency rates among immigrants vary widely by ancestry. More than 80 percent of the immigrants from several ancestry groups speak English "very well," including Egyptians (90.4 percent), Lebanese (89.5), Pakistanis (87.7), Romanians (86.5), Iranians (86.1), Thais (83.0) and Argentineans (81.6). Other ancestry groups lag far behind the overall average of 71.4 percent English proficient, including Cambodians (65.7), Vietnamese (64.4), Hondurans (53.5), Guatemalans (52.8) and Mexicans (49.9). (Source: Census 2000)
In 1999, the average employed immigrant who spoke English very well earned $40,741, more than double the $16,345 earned by immigrants who did not speak English at all. The increasing scale of English proficiency and earnings was recorded at every education level from less than high school through master's degree and beyond. (Source: Educational Testing Services, A Human Capital Concern: The Literary Proficiency of U.S. Immigrants, March 2004)
The ability to understand English was so crucial to immigrant success that foreign-born workers with moderate-to-high levels English proficiency had higher earnings than native-born workers with the same degree of English proficiency. More important, data from the National Adult Literacy Survey found that immigrants with a low degree of English proficiency earned one-half of what those with a medium degree of proficiency earned and less than one-third of highly English proficient immigrants. (Source: Educational Testing Services, A Human Capital Concern: The Literary Proficiency of U.S. Immigrants, March 2004)
Immigrants who speak English "not well" or "not at all" have median weekly earnings approximately 57 percent of those of U.S. born workers. The weekly earnings of immigrants who speak another language at home, but speak English "very well" or "well" are nearly 90 percent of those of U.S. born workers. Immigrants who speak English at home are best off, with median weekly earnings 20 percent higher than U.S. born workers. (Source: U.S. Department of Labor, How Do Immigrants Fare in the U.S. Labor Market?, Monthly Labor Review, December 1992)
The U.S. Department of Education found that those with limited English proficiency are less likely to be employed, less likely to be employed continuously, tend to work in the least desirable sectors and earn less than those who speak English. Annual earnings by non-English proficient adults were approximately half of the total population surveyed. ? (Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics; English Literacy and Language Minorities in the United States, August 2001)
The Tomas Rivera Policy Institute found that, "far and away, the most commonly cited obstacle to gaining college knowledge was the language barrier." While 96 percent of the Latino parents surveyed in the nation's three largest cities expected their children to go to college, nearly two-thirds missed at least half of the questions on a "mini-test of college knowledge." (Source: Tomas Rivera Policy Institute, College Knowledge, April 2002)
Effective English language instruction is an essential antipoverty tool for working immigrant families. Poverty and the need for public benefits, such as food stamps, are more closely related to limited English proficiency than with citizenship or legal status. (Source: Urban Institute, Immigrant Well-Being in New York and Los Angeles, August 2002)
The Canadian Government spends $260 million annually to do government business in both of the nation's official languages. This figure was 0.16% of the Canadian federal budget. If the U.S. was to spend 0.16% of the federal budget to do government business in two languages, the cost would be $3.8 billion. (Source: Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages, Canada)
The Canadian Government spends $24 per Canadian resident per year to do government business in both of the nation?s official languages. If the U.S. was to spend $24 per person per year on government multilingualism, the cost would be $5.7 billion. (Source: Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages, Canada)
There are 25 nations and 20 official languages in the European Union, yielding 380 translation combinations. (Source: European Commission)
In June 2004, facing a backlog of 60,000 pages awaiting translation, European Union officials were asked to limit their documents to 15 pages to avoid further burdening the system. The average document size prior to this request was 32 pages. (Source: European Commission)
There are 1,800 translators, representing eight percent of the entire staff, at the European Commission. (Source: European Commission)
In 2004, the cost of translation and interpretation at the European Commission was $720 million. It is estimated that by 2007, the cost will have risen to $1.06 billion. (Source: European Commission)
The cost of multilingual ballots and translations represented one-eighth of Los Angeles County?s $16 million expense in the Nov. 2004 general election. (Source: European Commission)
The City of San Francisco must spend $350,000 for each language that a document is translated into under the city's bilingual government ordinance. (Source: Janet Ng, Asian Week.com, June 2001)
The total annual cost for the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to provide language services is $2.2 million. (Source: U.S. Office of Management and Budget, Report to Congress: Assessment of the Total Benefits and Costs of Implementing Executive Order No. 13166: Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, March 14, 2002)
Of the 3,600 Chinese ballots prepared for the Sept. 2002 primary election in King County, Wash., only 24 (or 0.67 percent) were used. (Source: Warren Cornwall, Bilingual vote turnout low: Only 24 Chinese ballots returned in primary, Seattle Times, October 9, 2002)
The total cost of providing multilingual services for the Immigration and Naturalization Service would be between $114 million and $150 million annually. (Source: U.S. Office of Management and Budget, Report to Congress: Assessment of the Total Benefits and Costs on Implementing Executive Order No. 13166: Improving Access to Services for Person with Limited English Proficiency, March 14, 2002)
It costs $1.86 million annually to prepare written translations for food stamp recipients nationwide. The cost for oral translations skyrocket to $21 million nationally per year. (Source: U.S. Office of Management and Budget, Report to Congress: Assessment of the Total Benefits and Costs of Implementing Executive Order No. 13166: Improving Access to Services for Person with Limited English Proficiency, March 14, 2002)
79 percent of Americans, and 81 percent of first and second generation Americans favor making English the official language of the United States. Majority support for official English was recorded among every subgroup, including age, gender, race, and political affiliation. (Source: Zogby International, June 2005)
A 2001 Gallup poll found that 96 percent of Americans believe that it is essential/important that immigrants living in the United States learn to speak English. (Source: Gallup Poll, 2001)
85 percent of Americans believe it is very hard or somewhat hard for immigrants to get a good job or do well in this country without learning English. (Source: Gallup Poll, 2001)
Nearly two-in-three foreign born adults say that the United States should expect all immigrants to learn English. (Source: Public Agenda survey of 1,002 foreign born adults, 2002)
68 percent of Hispanics say that the goal of bilingual education programs should be to make sure that students learn English well. (Source: The Latino Coalition survey of 1,000 Hispanic adults, 2002)
Three-in-four foreign born adults believe that schools should teach English to immigrant students as quickly as possible, even if it means that they need to catch up in other subjects. (Source: The Latino Coalition survey of 1,000 Hispanic adults, 2002)
Nearly 90 percent of Latinos believe that adult Latino immigrants need to learn English in order to succeed in the United States. (Source: Pew Hispanic Center/Kaiser Family Foundation survey of 2,929 Hispanic adults, 2002)
86 percent of Americans call the ability to speak and understand English an absolutely essential or very important obligation for all Americans. (Source: National Opinion Research Center survey of 2,904 adults, 1996)
Myth: At the Constitutional Convention, the Founding Fathers debated and decided against making English the official language.
Reality: The issue was never discussed at the Constitutional Convention.i Because more than 90 percent of the non-slave population was of British ancestry,ii and even the former Dutch colonies had been under English rule for more than a century, the topic was not controversial enough to even be debated.
Myth: A proposal in Congress to make German the official language of the United States failed by one vote.
Reality: Congress never voted on a proposal to make German the official language.iii (The myth probably is based on a 1794 proposal to translate some laws into German. It was defeated in the House of Representatives, 42-41.)iv
Myth: The fact that The Federalist Papers were printed in German shows that the Founding Fathers opposed making English the official language of government.
Reality: The Federalist Papers were not government documents; they were a series of newspaper columns.v Official English applies only to government documents. (Furthermore, in The Federalist No. 2, John Jay mentions his pleasure that this country had "one united people... speaking the same language ...")
Myth: Official English adds more intrusive laws and regulations at a time when the public wants less government.
Reality: Official English does not restrict the rights of private citizens in any way. Instead, it reins in government bureaucracies that are trying to expand their programs.
Myth: Official English would deprive criminal defendants of their right to an interpreter.
Reality: Any bill sponsored by U.S.ENGLISH would provide a specific exception for "actions that protect the rights of ... criminal defendants."
Myth: A 911 interpreter would violate official English.
Reality: Any bill sponsored by U.S.ENGLISH would provide a specific exemption for "actions ... that protect the public health."
Myth: Official English would bar non-native celebrations such as St. Patricks Day, Cinco de Mayo and Oktoberfest.
Reality: Official English refers solely to business conducted by government entities, with specific exemptions for mottoes, holiday celebrations and the like. Not only would non-native holidays continue to be celebrated after the enactment of official English, these special days would likely be joined by other cultural festivities taught to Americans by newcomers speaking a shared language English.
Myth: Official English would prohibit the teaching of foreign languages in schools.
Reality: Acquiring a foreign language is both a gift and an asset. As it deals with only government entities, publications and documents, the enactment of official English would not affect the teaching of foreign languages. U.S. ENGLISH wholeheartedly encourages the teaching of foreign languages at every level of education. Proficiency in multiple languages opens more doors and raises incomes even higher than proficiency in a single language alone.
Myth: Official English would ban the speaking of languages other than English in homes and places of worship.
Reality: While a common language allows us easy access to medical care and government services, the ability to be free in our homes and our places of worship is a right that would not be infringed by official English. While learning English allows all Americans a shot at the American dream, official English refers to actions done by the government, proudly maintaining the prized speech and religious freedoms offered by our Constitution.
Myth: Most nations have not declared an official language.
Reality: More than 90 percent (177) of the worlds nations have enacted an official language. English is the most common official language on Earth.
Myth: Most immigrants oppose official English legislation.
Reality: Over the last two decades, support for official English and the end to bilingual education has been noticeable among immigrants. In some cases, support for these initiatives has been higher among the foreign born than the population as a whole. Immigrants themselves have cited language as the greatest barrier that keeps them from succeeding in the United States. Several independent surveys have found support for official English legislation to cover between two-thirds and four-fifth> of the foreign born population.
) or hateful toward Non-English speaking people. My first summer when I arrived to the States. Walking thru the mall with my mom and my brother. Me and my brother spoke no english, my mom did. While we are chatting, walking thru the mall, some a-hole yells at us(in middle of the mall at a woman and her two little boys, 12 & 8), "Speak English in this country!". If I could face this idiot today, I could say "and dumb**** like you shouldn't speak at all". 
