- 7,153
- Jakarta
That render looks amazing.
That render looks amazing.
My only problem with the render is that the front fascia seems a bit... flat. Like it had a slight head-on accident with a wall. Maybe if they rounded the front bumper a bit it'll look even better, but I already like it more than the FT-1 without the stupid F1 style nose. The location of the Toyota badge also looks a bit off relative to the headlights.
Doesn't look like the prototype. The rear looks a lot better than the bulging one on the prototype lolTopspeed (an auto news blog) just uploaded a new render based on the camouflaged prototype.
Looks like it's taking the NSX route of not looking anything like it's predecessor.
View attachment 589140
There is nothing from the A80 Supra that was adapted to this upcoming car.
fixed ya.
This is (imo) a much better render of the prototype:
Wait, there's going to be a Beemer varient of this thing? I thought it was just going to be sold under Toyota with BMW helping out unless I've been misinformed.How come no one's talking about BMW's version of the car?
looked like 1991
tacked on a foot high spoiler
I've been interpreting it as like they're both making a different think, like the GT86 and BRZ and the Miata and Fiata.Wait, there's going to be a Beemer varient of this thing? I thought it was just going to be sold under Toyota with BMW helping out unless I've been misinformed.
Not that I can see. The A80 was designed at the peak of anonymous blobby 1990s car design and it shows even at the time, just like every previous generation had been a blatant me-too effort of something else already on the market. The A60 was the only one I think that would have really stood out, if only because it debuted so early in the decade that it was before most of the cars that came to define "80's sporty coupe".@Tornado not really, only agree 30%, i wasn't talking about the whole car, some parts are worth adapted
The 911 has been in continuous production with evolutionary design changes for 50 years, despite the big scare towards the end of the 964 generation. The Ford GT was a famous race car which ten years ago was resurrected in 11/10ths scale before it was updated as the current car with modern design themes. Both of those were iconic.Examples like ford GT/ 911 had way far back years compared to supra
And there's no reason to do either thing. About the closest the Supra ever got to design cohesion as it went on was when the A70 kept the flipup headlights the A60 had, but in a decade where even the Honda Accord had flipup headlights. If the camoflaged car on the previous page is a test mule, and with the car being co-developed with the help of BMW, then Toyota seems to be making a very different car from what the A70 and A80 Supra were when on the market. That precludes making it big and muscular and in your face, and that precludes throwing in a bunch of awkward stylistic touches to appease people who would never give up their A80s to buy it anyway.agreed but the rear lights and its fat/ wide/ aggressive rear can be adapted as shown below
Both of those were iconic.
and with the car being co-developed with the help of BMW, then Toyota seems to be making a very different car from what the A70 and A80 Supra were when on the market.
That precludes making it big and muscular and in your face
Looks like it's taking the NSX route of not looking anything like it's predecessor
And the W-Body Monte Carlo raced in NASCAR for nearly as long and with about as much relevance.supra is too, it is used in jgtc/ super gt for almost a decade
Maybe the A80 shouldn't have been called Supra, since it was almost nothing like the first two generations and most markets didn't get the A70s that were similar.Agreed. Perhaps, then they should not called it supra then?
I'd buy that.This is (imo) a much better render of the prototype:
I don't know how it could be, it looks almost MX-5 Sized.If there's an impression I get from the footage, it's that it seems very heavy. Don't ask me why, it seems to be lumbering along as it goes.