- 2,632
- United Kingdom
But did he get an orange SR at the end? That's where it really hurts.It was the last lap and he won. No penalty.
But did he get an orange SR at the end? That's where it really hurts.It was the last lap and he won. No penalty.
You could play "CART world series" and see what happens :-)But did he get an orange SR at the end? That's where it really hurts.
Just tried one of today's TT events @ Dragon Trail II in the X-bow.. seems you can't go outside any of the rumbles onto the red stuff without getting slapped with a penalty? What gives PD? make your minds up please! Can we go outside the rumbles or not?
You gotta love the inconsistency of this games applied track limits!! haha 👎
No orange SR, he was praised in the racing media for weeks, months, even years afterwards...
At the time it was called "The pass in the grass"... I guess now it's just called the "The pass".
The media is the key word there. If the sports reporters like you, they will praise. Rossi's pass on Stoner in 08 is no different, same with Marquez on Rossi a few years later. The position should have been returned in all cases IMO, as you should not be able to gain a position by running off designated track boundaries.
I don't mind all the cutting if kerbs allow it, what I do mind is locked setup and driving aids that are not valid (TCS, ESP and ABS is OK if you really need it) adding cauntersteer help, brake cones etc is absurd in competitive racing game. It is OK for practise... But please.
I don't mind all the cutting if kerbs allow it, what I do mind is locked setup and driving aids that are not valid (TCS, ESP and ABS is OK if you really need it) adding cauntersteer help, brake cones etc is absurd in competitive racing game. It is OK for practise... But please.
One of the solutions to this cutting scenarios could be addition of rule that none of the wheels can be out side of drivable surface in turns, this way only two wheels could be placed on kerbs and other two on asphalt.
Cheers...
Which brings me back to the vid of the lap in question. If that’s for a leaderboard then it should be treated the same as a qualifying lap, so in my opinion not Valid
Depends on what's outside of the rumbles. On DT, if I remember correctly, you have a red surface beyond the black and white strips. If you put 4 wheels there you get a penalty. In Lake Maggiore's, if you put 4 wheels on the red surface you also get a penalty.
Maybe I’m too sportsman like to survive in this world anymoreI like "my" CSA for when I'm not serious and just want to put a lap in asap and have fun. Yeah, I'm lazy. On the other hand, I don't like TCS unless my tires are dying off.
Drive with whatever the game puts at your disposal. Fastest way will be without aids, but I don't mind when I'm driving with ABS only and others aren't. Sometimes I'll use TCS too, especially if I'm physically tired. If I'm slower, I don't mind, as long as I'm having fun. It's a game.
/off topic
Opinions are what divide people in this thread. But the game says it was valid. And the game is not biased. All leaderboards in GT ever have been filled with laps like the one in the OP where people will push the limits of what the game allows them to push.
I didn't say anything about putting barriers or gravel traps anywhere. I certainly didn't say anything about doing so at real-life circuits, and even more didn't say anything about doing it at Spa. Most of all I didn't say anything about doing it to Eau Rouge...@Famine : I’ve read what you’ve said and i see where you’re coming from and in some ways agree but; For instance, eau rouge. Spa is historic and has been used for some time, the cars are going faster than ever and now are starting to dictate the line of the track. There is no penalty for leaving the track there such as barriers or gravel traps etc. Anything you put there would cause a massive possibly life ending accident. This is kind of an inherited grey area and I think changing the track would spoil it.
Bahaha. "He needed to get Siri out to find out where the track was."@Famine You call that going past the white lines? How about this.
Maybe I’m too sportsman like to survive in this world anymore
@Famine You call that going past the white lines? How about this.
View attachment 708616
View attachment 708617
View attachment 708620
From this video;
@Famine You call that going past the white lines? How about this.
View attachment 708616
View attachment 708617
View attachment 708620
From this video;
@Famine You call that going past the white lines? How about this.
End of thread now surely!
Sorry I thought I saw a pic of Spa used in one of your posts :\ I was just pointing out that modifying it could be dangerous and wrong.I didn't say anything about putting barriers or gravel traps anywhere. I certainly didn't say anything about doing so at real-life circuits, and even more didn't say anything about doing it at Spa. Most of all I didn't say anything about doing it to Eau Rouge...
... although you might be surprised to learn that Eau Rouge was reprofiled as recently as 2002. You'd be amazed at how different it looked right up until the early 1980s. Enjoy.
Bahaha. "He needed to get Siri out to find out where the track was."
I recall the exit to Porsche Curves at Le Mans is routinely lengthened too.
The track limits for GT Sport are set by the stewards and organising body of the series. That's Polyphony Digital. For 20 years and all of its titles, it has routinely defined track limits as out-of-bounds being grass or gravel, with a car considered beyond the limit if it places a third or fourth wheel beyond that. Tarmac, kerb and concrete is all considered within the track limits. On occasion it makes the limits tighter, at some corners, but this is pretty much where PD draws its line.
The drivers, the stewards and the organising body of the series decide where the track limits are in the driver briefing. What's good for one series and set of drivers might not be good for another, even at the same circuit.
While GT Sport Calls it "Group 3", it is clearly emulating GT3 (same for the other "groups"). In my opinion, allowed aids should be what GT3 rules allow, therefore ABS and TCS yes, but no steering aid.I like "my" CSA for when I'm not serious and just want to put a lap in asap and have fun. Yeah, I'm lazy. On the other hand, I don't like TCS unless my tires are dying off.
Drive with whatever the game puts at your disposal. Fastest way will be without aids, but I don't mind when I'm driving with ABS only and others aren't. Sometimes I'll use TCS too, especially if I'm physically tired.
Nope. Those racers are unethical, cheaters and immoral.
I'm not familiar with them. In fact I've been deliberately driving off the circuit in order to prevent my SR rising (for research purposes for this site), and even when literally four wheels into the grass on some areas of most tracks I've still had an SR up indication.The infrequently or irregularly part is what may be questionable.
This game there are quite a few corners throughout the game where even putting a wheel on the grass will draw a penalty and many more that having 2 wheels still on the curb will also draw a penalty.
If you'd just carried on reading beyond the part you quoted:The game does not provide briefings, track maps or any other method of defining the limits other than trial and error of cutting the corners and see if the penalty box pops up.
In normal racing, the drivers, stewards and officials all get together in a room and talk it over beforehand. We don't get the two-way dialogue because it's a game, so we live with the rules set out for us.But again, the FIA doesn't make the rules on this. The drivers, the stewards and the organising body of the series decide where the track limits are in the driver briefing. What's good for one series and set of drivers might not be good for another, even at the same circuit. The simplistic "white lines are the limits" isn't necessarily the be-all and end-all. In fact it rarely is - most events allow the kerbs to be treated as part of the racing surface, although commonly they're also the limit of the racing surface, and wheels should not be put beyond them. That doesn't necessarily apply to F1, as you can see from the images.
The track limits for GT Sport are set by the stewards and organising body of the series. That's Polyphony Digital. For 20 years and all of its titles, it has routinely defined track limits as out-of-bounds being grass or gravel, with a car considered beyond the limit if it places a third or fourth wheel beyond that. Tarmac, kerb and concrete is all considered within the track limits. On occasion it makes the limits tighter, at some corners, but this is pretty much where PD draws its line.
Oh yeah, the video I posted on the first few pages that everyone ignored
I'm not familiar with them. In fact I've been deliberately driving off the circuit in order to prevent my SR rising (for research purposes for this site), and even when literally four wheels into the grass on some areas of most tracks I've still had an SR up indication.
Four wheels off into the grass/gravel on the inside of just about every corner I can think of would be a penalty or SR hit. Two wheels off into the grass/gravel on the inside of just about every corner I can think of would not be a penalty or SR hit. I'm not aware of any corner where one wheel into grass/gravel is a penalty or SR hit, although I'm aware of a couple where there is no grass/gravel and taking four wheels past the kerb (Dragon Trail chicane entry, for example; also Interlagos pit entry/turn 15) is a penalty or SR hit.
Where in that lap does the car go 10 foot off track? In fact I saw no off at all tbh! just the car clinging onto the edge of the rumbles finding the best lines.. unless under close scrutiny it does goes off marginally at one of the turns but that is still no comparison to the maggiore turn 4 discrepancy imo..
There's always 2 sides to every debate as it should be.. but it seems some of the guys who are in favor of the track limit exploit come across like a gang/lynch mob against the naysayers ready to pounce with some smart or idiotic comment
I tried the debate tactic in here for a few days now, but with all the constant ridiculing of peoples opinions and glorifying them with comparisons to the lowest scum walking the earth is not good taste.. A debate is exactly that! don't push it any further! I'm basically done with this subject now it started to stink bad 👎 See my avatar
Where in that lap does the car go 10 foot off track? In fact I saw no off at all tbh! just the car clinging onto the edge of the rumbles finding the best lines.. unless under close scrutiny it does goes off marginally at one of the turns but that is still no comparison to the maggiore turn 4 discrepancy imo..
There's always 2 sides to every debate as it should be.. but it seems some of the guys who are in favor of the track limit exploit come across like a gang/lynch mob against the naysayers ready to pounce with some smart or idiotic comment
I tried the debate tactic in here for a few days now, but with all the constant ridiculing of peoples opinions and glorifying them with comparisons to the lowest scum walking the earth is not good taste.. A debate is exactly that! don't push it any further! I'm basically done with this subject now it started to stink bad 👎 See my avatar