You wouldn't want to have a country controlled by a despot to have nukes . its simple really I have no clue why it should even be a question. A damm dictator is only answerable to himself. He gets pissed or feels threatened whats he care if he takes out a couple million people ? why bother creating history books if no one is going to bother reading them..Dictatorships are not a good thing ..Crazy despotic rulers do dumb stuff like putting people in ovens and causing world wars..a sane person does not risk his own destruction..so how could these so called leaders be considered in any way sane..On one hand you have saddam ..he just invades his neighbors when he runs out of money,, gasses and tortures his own people the Iranians and the Kurds,, Shoots missles at his neighbors when he can ,, and at American planes when he can't..yeah this guy should have all the nukes he want's...shoved up his butt maybe..a sure cure for his roids..The other nutty napoleon of Korea starves his population so he can spend 80 % of his countrys GNP on his military, trys very hard to blackmail his neighbors into giving him more money so he can produce more weapons and maybe feed a few soldiers, he also answers to no one,, and he thinks we in the west are all pussys cuase we let him get away with all of his bull plus he can always vaporize half of South korea any time he likes, using conventional means..he'll save his nukes for a better target..yeah this numbnut really want's nukes bad..we have some extras maybe we should cure his hemmaroid problem to. Again google up North Korea take some time to read about the Country and the regime.the damm history.Read what they themselves publish through there Consulate its all there..Then if you can in anyway find a defense for that regime you'd make a great lawyer or your just as much a friggin maniac killer as the leader of that pestilent piece of dung country.