So you'd rather lose than employ tactics. Check.
As you may or may not know, River Plate was relegated last year. During the last 10 games, our coach played ultra-defensive football (and he didn't apply it correctly, either). Everyone was against it. It's against River Plate's historical style of playing. We were relegated because our players focused more on defending than on scoring.
The truth is, I'd rather lose while playing as the dominant team, than win while playing as the weakest team. If you don't like it, fine. I don't think you have the right to say I'm wrong. I'm not saying Chelsea supporters should feel bad. And if I did say that, I'm sorry. But as the River Plate fan I am, I would feel embarrassed to see my team advance to a final like that.
And as I said earlier, if this is because I used the words "anti-football", I take it back.
Keepers playing on the half-way because they need to score isn't unusual. If he'd been struck by lightning moments before a goal, that wouldn't be normal circumstances. But goal keepers playing up the field in the final minutes, quite standard fare.
Under normal circumstances, as in, playing a game of no importance, Valdés wouldn't be standing there. The circumstances (semi-finals, two minutes away from finishing the match) made him being there. No wonder Chelsea tied the game.
As I said, in a normal match, where the outcome is not as important as yesterday's match, Barcelona would have won the match. If you can't see that, well... there's nothing more I can say.
I'm definitely being trolled right now. Are you seriously saying Chelsea beat Barcelona in both matches?
In BOTH matches?
BOTH?
1st leg: Chelsea 1-0 FC Barcelona
2nd leg: Chelsea 2-2 FC Barcelona.
You may have not understood what I say earlier. But I'm sure I've said it over two times already.
If Barcelona put them in their own nets, sure. But Chelsea scored them.
Chelsea scored 3* goals against a Barcelona that was more focused in attacking than in defended. Barcelona, on the other hand, scored 2 goals against a Chelsea that had all of its players inside its area. To me, Barcelona deserved the final far more than Chelsea. I won't talk about events that didn't happen, but I'm sure that if Barcelona had decided to defend all the time, like Chelsea did, it would have been victorious. Pep Guardiola knew that wasn't Barcelona's style, and went all out trying to break Chelsea's defence. Yes, Barcelona was eliminated. But I'm proud of Barcelona, eliminated while playing as the superior team, one that wasn't scared of its rival.
Now if you were Chelsea's manager, would you have your starting 11 attack and have ball control against a team like that? Of course you wouldn't. And even if Barca managed to tie via aggregate, Chelsea would have still advanced by way of away goals.
Truth be told, as a manager, I think Di Matteo (sp.?) did the right thing. I'm not denying that. It's just that I do not feel good about that style of play. I understand it's necessary. But don't expect me to feel
happy or
satisfied for eliminating Barcelona that way.
Obligatory message:
And as I said earlier, if this is because I used the words "anti-football", I take it back.