What movies have you seen lately? Now with reviews!Movies 

  • Thread starter scentedsoap
  • 8,208 comments
  • 484,215 views
The time and effort put into little details that most people will never notice is one of the things that really sets this movie apart

I think they would have used a movement algorithm, as with Lord of the Rings... but yeah... the fluid way the dragons all move is so seamless that you don't notice it. In movies like LOTR, with a lot of algorithm generated animation going on in the background, the unnatural way the characters tend to mill in the background takes you out of it. Now that I think of it, the flocking and flying movements of the dragons in the background were pretty flawless... wouldn't be surprised if it was all done by hand.

-

Attention to detail. A former high school classmate who reviews films for a living nowadays (wrote for Ebert) says Miyazaki would be proud. That's high praise indeed. ;)
 
Everything was done by hand in the first movie, according to the behind the scenes video, so I wouldn't be surprised if the same was true for the second one.
 
I also seen How To Train Your Dragon 2 and by god, it is absolutely beautiful. The entire film was breath-taking from start to finish and had a deep story to boot.

Absolutely phenomenal job by Dreamworks and I cannot wait for the 3rd installment.
 
Absolutely phenomenal job by Dreamworks.

And number one on the list of things that I never thought that I would hear is...

Not a criticism of Dreamworks by the way. I am aware that in recent years they have put out some much better stuff than they used to.
 
And number one on the list of things that I never thought that I would hear is...

Not a criticism of Dreamworks by the way. I am aware that in recent years they have put out some much better stuff than they used to.
You didn't like Shrek 1 and 2?
 
The_Wolverine_posterUS.jpg


The Wolverine (6/10)

Where do I begin?

Ok, you know when someone is trying to tell you a story, but they keep confusing it with two other stories at the same time, and then they get confused and make up a bunch of senseless BS to make it all fit? Yeah, I didn't either, until I watched this.

This literally takes the 1982 Wolverine Limited Edition Mini-Series by Claremont/Miller (Yes, Frank Miller), the 1988 Wolverine #1-4 story, and some largely confusing Avengers side story stuff and attempts to cram it all in here. Let me explain that to non-comic book fans: It took two of Wolverine's greatest stories and tried to make them one story by filling in the gaps with a side-character storyline that I am shocked isn't part of The Avengers license. It just got very confusing.

But it did, kind of, sort of get the points across of those stories, except the purpose to those stories was to show that Logan is not the psychotic, raging beast he appears to be. That comes through here, but it also was well established in four X-Men films and the first Wolverine movie. See, he needed to be shown as a monstrous, raging killer for this film to really be relevant. He spends tons of time talking about how he isn't "that" person anymore. What person? He is the same here as always, the reluctant hero.

Now, let's get to some plot holes. So, he is seeing a guy he knew from WWII, in a flashback scene that makes Indiana Jones surviving a nuke inside a fridge seem plausible, and he sees the guy now and they recognize each other and the guy calls him Logan. WAIT! In the first movie he knew his name was James Howlett right up until he had his memory wiped by a magic bullet to the head. So, crazy old Japanese guy has kept tabs on Wolverine's current identity for over 70 years? I bet that could have come in handy immediately following the first movie.

Also, didn't the last movie establish that Wolverine and Sabretooth were in the European theater, together?

Apparently genetic mutations are like livers, you can pass them on to others with the help of medical science.

Japan has their own version of Hawkeye? Cool.

Wolverine can use his claws in his sleep, but not against cables holding him back.

Now for some spoiler complaints (highlight to read):
What did the claws have to do with anything? Why was that the only way to steal his healing power? Why not just cut off his arm? Clearly we weren't worried about killing him.

They cut off his claws, and he only regrows bone claws. And we establish it is all connected to X-Men: The Last Stand and Days of Future Past. In DoFP he has adamantium claws again.

Oh hey, look; Professor X is alive! He did get that new body at the end of The Last Stand! But he still needs a wheelchair? That body sucks.


And finally, The Silver Samurai. Apparently Fox thinks that completely destroying some of Wolverine's biggest villains is fun. I thought they learned after the Deadpool debacle. Imagine if Joker were running around in a circus clown outfit, or Mandarin was really just a...oh wait. Here is the biggest issue with how they changed Silver Samurai: All the characters for his back story and alter ego were right there, along with all of their motivations. Jesus, there was even two different special swords that could have been the ultimate goal of his actions. They were in the film, but the writers were too busy getting off on "tricking" the audience with the most transparent surprise villain ever that they didn't use him. They just turned the whole thing into a convoluted mess.

Here is the thing: I didn't mind the changes and combining of stories. That was fine and could have worked. But the writers got busy hoping to fool comic fans. So, they completely made one character laughable and added in a red herring in the form of a literal throw-away side-villain. It made the story a mess. There were moments when I was sitting there confused as hell at what they were doing. Physics got tossed out the window, again literally in one scene, and no writer seemed to be keeping track of the story timeline.

It was better than Origins, but this was far from a good movie.
 
Last edited:
I would have given it 6/10, but seriously, your review is such a downer, I'm thinking of downgrading that to 5... :lol:

-

The missus remarked that 90% of the movie seemed dedicated to finding reasons to slash, stab or impale Logan... just because. Like the screenwriters had a fetish for cuts.
 
The_Wolverine_posterUS.jpg


The Wolverine (6/10)

Where do I begin?

Ok, you know when someone is trying to tell you a story, but they keep confusing it with two other stories at the same time, and then they get confused and make up a bunch of senseless BS to make it all fit? Yeah, I didn't either, until I watched this.

This literally takes the 1982 Wolverine Limited Edition Mini-Series by Claremont/Miller (Yes, Frank Miller), the 1988 Wolverine #1-4 story, and some largely confusing Avengers side story stuff and attempts to cram it all in here. Let me explain that to non-comic book fans: It took two of Wolverine's greatest stories and tried to make them one story by filling in the gaps with a side-character storyline that I am shocked isn't part of The Avengers license. It just got very confusing.

But it did, kind of, sort of get the points across of those stories, except the purpose to those stories was to show that Logan is not the psychotic, raging beast he appears to be. That comes through here, but it also was well established in four X-Men films and the first Wolverine movie. See, he needed to be shown as a monstrous, raging killer for this film to really be relevant. He spends tons of time talking about how he isn't "that" person anymore. What person? He is the same here as always, the reluctant hero.

Now, let's get to some plot holes. So, he is seeing a guy he knew from WWII, in a flashback scene that makes Indiana Jones surviving a nuke inside a fridge seem plausible, and he sees the guy now and they recognize each other and the guy calls him Logan. WAIT! In the first movie he knew his name was James Howlett right up until he had his memory wiped by a magic bullet to the head. So, crazy old Japanese guy has kept tabs on Wolverine's current identity for over 70 years? I bet that could have come in handy immediately following the first movie.

Also, didn't the last movie establish that Wolverine and Sabretooth were in the European theater, together?

Apparently genetic mutations are like livers, you can pass them on to others with the help of medical science.

Japan has their own version of Hawkeye? Cool.

Wolverine can use his claws in his sleep, but not against cables holding him back.

Now for some spoiler complaints (highlight to read):
What did the claws have to do with anything? Why was that the only way to steal his healing power? Why not just cut off his arm? Clearly we weren't worried about killing him.

They cut off his claws, and he only regrows bone claws. And we establish it is all connected to X-Men: The Last Stand and Days of Future Past. In DoFP he has adamantium claws again.

Oh hey, look; Professor X is alive! He did get that new body at the end of The Last Stand! But he still needs a wheelchair? That body sucks.


And finally, The Silver Samurai. Apparently Fox thinks that completely destroying some of Wolverine's biggest villains is fun. I thought they learned after the Deadpool debacle. Imagine if Joker were running around in a circus clown outfit, or Mandarin was really just a...oh wait. Here is the biggest issue with how they changed Silver Samurai: All the characters for his back story and alter ego were right there, along with all of their motivations. Jesus, there was even two different special swords that could have been the ultimate goal of his actions. They were in the film, but the writers were too busy getting off on "tricking" the audience with the most transparent surprise villain ever that they didn't use him. They just turned the whole thing into a convoluted mess.

Here is the thing: I didn't mind the changes and combining of stories. That was fine and could have worked. But the writers got busy hoping to fool comic fans. So, they completely made one character laughable and added in a red herring in the form of a literal throw-away side-villain. It made the story a mess. There were moments when I was sitting there confused as hell at what they were doing. Physics got tossed out the window, again literally in one scene, and no writer seemed to be keeping track of the story timeline.

It was better than Origins, but this was far from a good movie.
All of this, this is why I want Marvel to get the entire X-Men franchise again and let Disney do a better job with it.
 
I would have given it 6/10, but seriously, your review is such a downer, I'm thinking of downgrading that to 5... :lol:

-

The missus remarked that 90% of the movie seemed dedicated to finding reasons to slash, stab or impale Logan... just because. Like the screenwriters had a fetish for cuts.
I contemplated 6.5, then thought better of it.

Eh, it was like that in the comics. He always seemed overwhelmed by ninjas, just to heal and eventually pick them off one by one. The 1982 mini-series was his first ever solo adventure. It fully established just how well his healing power worked. Not that we needed it here, after the WWII scene. That one established it pretty well.

Big point was, with or without healing powers he is the same guy.

That reminds me. For a guy without healing powers he can survive a lot of bullets.
 
@FoolKiller - Without healing powers, he's still got an adamantium ribcage. That still doesn't explain the gut shots, though.

I think the premise, as the Viper lady suggested, is that his healing powers were suppressed but not completely removed. Or then again, it could be simply Hollywood logic. A lot of what happened when he was supposedly depowered should have killed a normal human, indestructible skeleton or not.

-

X-Men will always be hard to do on-screen. Hell, half of what's in the comics pisses off fans, either way (that's true of most comics, anyway). Disney might do better... they might not.
 
The Fault in Our Stars
tumblr_mydouiYnl31sfevmio2_500.jpg


My significant other dragged me along to see this, and I'm slightly embarrassed to say I quite enjoyed it. There's a few cliches scattered here and there with a smattering of cheesiness but apart form that it pretty well done, it tackles a very emotional subject but manages to not be too depressing. Don't get me wrong it's a real tear jerker, in fact half the cinema was blubbering at certain moments, but it balances it all quite well. 7/10

The Book Thief

upload_2014-7-10_22-38-57.jpeg


This thoroughly confused me, the reviews for this were largely extremely positive, tonnes of 5 stars and what confuses me is WHY?!? It's not a bad film, just nothing happened, some people die and a girl learns to read. That's it.
I got an hour in and wondered why the hell I was wasting my time watching nothing happen, it completely lacked passion and drama and ended up incredibly bland and forgettable. The acting saves it from a very low score, Geoffrey Rush was particularly good. 4/10
 

Attachments

  • upload_2014-7-10_22-36-12.jpeg
    upload_2014-7-10_22-36-12.jpeg
    9.7 KB · Views: 15
burlesque-poster.jpg


Burlesque (1/10)

Needed something to fall asleep to for my Saturday afternoon nap. (worked well for that)

Not even the skillful acting of Cher & Christina Aguilera could make this movie good.
 
Well, it's awful easy to start waxing philosophical about movies when you're watching one so vacuous you enter a trance-like state within the first fifteen minutes.

-

Finally watched a movie I've been waiting for since the start of the year:


How To Train Your Dragon 2

HTTYD2_Theatrical_Poster.jpg


I'd go into depth, but it would seem like nitpicking to dissect something so good. Yes, it does have its problems. There are some situations and scenes that telegraph themselves quite obviously, but that doesn't lessen the emotional impact much. There's more raw emotional anguish, conflict, joy and release in the single song in the movie than in the entirety of Frozen... okay, "Do You Want To Build a Snowman" is unflinchingly close, but that one ended on a sour note. This one doesn't.

Anyway, lovely film, very real, rounded and believable characters, and a heartwarming and affirming story. And like the first movie, it doesn't pull any punches. This may be an animated feature, but characters can get hurt and die.

Also: Dragons. Lovely, incredibly well-animated, colorful and imaginative dragons. The animators have outdone themselves with Toothless. He was already an incredibly expressive character in the first movie. Here they took it up a notch.

-

Even with the minor narrative problems, 9/10. This is the best animated feature to come out this year. Can't wait for more sequels.
Loved the first movie. Thanks for the review. Really looking forward to buying this on 3d BD when it becomes available.
 
Dawn of the Planet of the Apes - 9/10

Saw this last night, and the general consensus of the reviews is true; this might be the most intelligent of the blockbusters this year. The effects are unreal - er, bad choice of words, they're actually incredibly real, to the point you repeatedly have to remind yourself these aren't real apes. But it's the emotion in the film that really carries it. Unsurprisingly, a lot of that comes from the ape camp - Serkis absolutely deserves recognition for his work here - but there's a lot from the human side too. There are good and bad individuals on both sides, and it's the distrust within both camps that is the main reason for conflict and resulting downfalls for both.

Loved it, absolutely did. I won't offer any major spoilers, and only say Caesar is a truly apt name for the leader of the apes. Go see it!
 
Contains Spoilers!!! Look Away!!!

The Wolverine


I don't know what goes on in the comics but I can't get pass Wolverine sexing up his old acquaintance's granddaughter. :odd: Also, reluctant to commit seppuku random Japanese army officer becomes wealthy tycoon? Who'd knew?!!

Now that I've gotten that out of the way, the movie was meh. Not bad but nothing to call home about.

@FoolKiller lmao, now I remember Japanese Hawkeye. :lol:

Elysium

This movies is ridiculous and entertaining at the same time! :lol: First we get to see Halo, then the world, only ten times as 🤬 up. The main guy gets a ghetto surgery and sticks on an exo-suit, drilling bolts directly into his flesh and other grusome stuff. He gets tossed around in said exo-suit without it hurting him (the suit dislodging and ripping part of his flesh). Then there's the AK that fires air burst ammunition, which in the world of Elysium is much more effective at taking out armor than standard rounds. :eek: William Fichtner was there and movies are always better with him in it. The leader of the ghetto clan, what's his name, Spider? He looks and sounds too goofy to be a leader. When I see him, I just can't. He'd be better as a comedian or something. And then we have Kruger. Man, that guy is the most entertaining part of the movie! His sarcasm and the way he speaks, he's such an entertaining character.

"It's only a flesh wound!!! :D" in his little hilarious evil voice

*blows the guy up*

I was assuming this movie was trying to go for the dark and bleak futuristic tone but it just came off as ridiculous to me. Not that it isn't entertaining, because it sure as hell is, but I just can't take it seriously. Overall good, I was entertained.
 
Last edited:
I saw this: 5.5/10 American Psycho

american-psycho-dvd.jpg

Weird ass movie, wasn't all that enjoyable if I'm honest.

And then this, Non-Stop 8/10
Non-Stop.jpg

Pretty cool visuals, pleasant actors, and a decent plot twist.
 
walk-of-shame-online-free-putlocker.jpg


7.5/10 If you wan't something light hearted that requires very little brain effort Walk Of Shame is a rather witty comedy.

lone-survivor-online-free-putlocker.jpg


9.5/10 Lone Survivor in my opinion is simply epic based on a true story don't miss this one.
 
Dawn of the Planet of the Apes - 9/10

Saw this last night, and the general consensus of the reviews is true; this might be the most intelligent of the blockbusters this year. The effects are unreal - er, bad choice of words, they're actually incredibly real, to the point you repeatedly have to remind yourself these aren't real apes. But it's the emotion in the film that really carries it. Unsurprisingly, a lot of that comes from the ape camp - Serkis absolutely deserves recognition for his work here - but there's a lot from the human side too. There are good and bad individuals on both sides, and it's the distrust within both camps that is the main reason for conflict and resulting downfalls for both.

Loved it, absolutely did. I won't offer any major spoilers, and only say Caesar is a truly apt name for the leader of the apes. Go see it!
Great review. I truly enjoyed the first and look forward to seeing the sequal.
 
Last movie I saw was Rio 2 and to be honest it just more of the same. A few cheesy lines yet again with a story that only appeals to younger children, but the animation is tops-pretty much faultless. In a word, I'd say that it was childish. 5/10
 
Well, it is a children's movie...

Finally watched "Star Trek: Into Darkness"... and, to be honest... despite the swiss cheese plot (suspension of disbelief level when Scottie sneaks into a top secret military installation and boards a warship undetected... over 9,000...), the twists that you could see coming from miles away, and how Sherlock Whatsisname Cumberbatch doesn't look anything like Ricardo Montalban... I really enjoyed it.

Let's be clear: Star Trek never makes sense. And though "Into Darkness" perhaps lacks the overarching philosophical subtext of many of the better Star Trek movies, it's a hell of a lot more fun to watch than some of the Star Trek clunkers that have come out in recent decades.

8/10.
 
Jodorowsky's Dune. A documentary about a movie that was never made. Pretty epic, 9.5/10. This crazy director of surreal riot-inducing spiritual parables (see El Topo and The Holy Mountain) picked Dune as his next project and assembled an amazing team. HR Giger, Dali, the guy who did the effects on 2001 space odessey, Mick Jagger. Two years into development ran out of steam due to lack of financial support/Hollywood cowardice/unrealistic expectations (development assumed $15 million budget.)
 
300 Rise Of An Empire

A lot better than I expected and I was shocked with the amount of action from beginning to end. Truly enjoyed this.


MV5BMTEwNTU2MjAwMDdeQTJeQWpwZ15BbWU3MDk2Njc2Njk@._V1_SX640_SY720_.jpg
 
Guardians of the Galaxy - 9.0 / 10

Forget the previous Disney-backed Marvel films. Yes, even Avengers. Despite the presence of a CGI raccoon and tree, this film had more heart and emotion in it than any of the previous nine that make up the MCU. It has a lot of material to cover in a relatively short time-span, and does it effectively, while still keeping you interested. The set pieces are great, though it too often feels like we're either looking at an enclosed set, or nothing but CGI. Some of the environments don't feel as fleshed out as they could be I suppose; Knowhere in particular.

If anybody doubted Pratt's ability to be the main character, those doubts can be dropped about 2 minutes after he shows up on screen. He has presence, and is immediately likeable. I had my doubts about a wrestler (Bautista) playing Drax though, but he's hilarious, almost as if stereotype about the poor acting of wrestlers was turned into a strength in comedic timing and deadpan delivery. If anything, I'd say Saldana's Gamora is the weakest character on screen, if only because her character's choices don't feel like they had as much behind them as others, and her guard coming down around these new-found friends felt too fast and too complete for a supposed "biological weapon".

You'll hear that Rocket and Groot are the heart of the film, and with good reason: they are. Rocket has one of the most touching scenes in the last big fight, and an unexpected scene early on, where you'll actually feel empathy for the drunk raccoon-like little guy. Groot delivers his trademark line with subtle changes each time, and if you remember Iron Giant, you have no reason to doubt Diesel's abilities here. The CGI is also very well done, other than one part with a wet Rocket that doesn't look completely convincing. The rest? They both look like living, breathing entities on screen, Rocket uncannily so in the final dust-up.

Lee Pace was pretty terrifying as Ronan, a hulking fanatic with no mercy. Karen Gillan is unrecognizable, and slightly under-utilized, as Nebula, usually in the background of Ronan's scenes, despite close ties to the big bad this entire MCU has been building up...

Speaking of, yes, you see him. He's imposing, and a strange blend of practical and CGI. Ronan's no nonsense approach to discussions with him, especially the one in person, gave me a lot of hope for more screen time from the Mad Titan, but it looks like we'll have to wait on that. Of course, he may or may not still have one of his daughters at his side...

It was a lot of fun, a modern-day space epic with genuine characters you want to root for in all the ways the Star Wars prequels weren't. All day I've been wanting to watch it again. I gave it the same rating as the new Apes film, because despite them being very different, they both were probably the most satisfying films I'll see in theatres this year.
 
@SlipZtrEm Since Ronan is in this I need to know something.

Is he Kree? Like they definitely say he is Kree? For that matter, do they also specifically say the "police" are Nova Corps?

This will explain a lot about AoS and add to a working theory I have as to a couple of mysteries on that show.

No clue why I am asking. I'm seeing it tomorrow. But I don't care about spoilers and am having a fanboy-gasm as at where all of this is going.
 
@SlipZtrEm Since Ronan is in this I need to know something.

Is he Kree? Like they definitely say he is Kree? For that matter, do they also specifically say the "police" are Nova Corps?

This will explain a lot about AoS and add to a working theory I have as to a couple of mysteries on that show.

No clue why I am asking. I'm seeing it tomorrow. But I don't care about spoilers and am having a fanboy-gasm as at where all of this is going.

Yes to both.
 
intro_marvelstudios_rocketraccoon_gotg.jpg


Guardians of the Galaxy (9/10)

This is why we love movies. Director James Gunn had said he wanted to make a movie like the sci-fi and action films he grew up watching in the 70s and 80s. Yes, he did it. Remember that feeling after seeing the first Star Wars movies or the Indian Jones films? That is what this felt like. The galaxy is in danger of destruction, the only people who know it are the wretches of society, they are reluctant heroes created purely by chance, their pasts are full of tragedy, and there are still moments you can laugh at.

It's light and fun. This is what a fun summer blockbuster should feel like. The story didn't have glaring plot holes that jumped out in my mind, and they still had a way to make you really feel emotion, be it happy or sad.

And Rocket is freaking awesome!!!

That's it. That's all I got to say. The only negative that jumped at me has more to do with how the physics of certain technology worked to do what it did, but I can't get too hung up on that while watching interstellar flights, energy weapons, near immortal beings, and crazy powerful artifacts.
 
I'm going to see Guardians of the Galaxy in a couple hours.
Now, how is Lucy? One of my nephews and one of my childhood friends have said it is a must see. Any reviews? I gotta know if this is the case.

Just came back from Guardians of the Galaxy. 9.5/10(that missing .5 is for what was mentioned above about Gemora dropping her wall so quickly)

Go see it . Don't wait to see it on tv or computer screen. My favorite quote of the movie I will not spoil or reveal. Only if you saw it, it mentions a popular artist's name. That is all.
 
Last edited:
Back