DesertPenguin
(Banned)
- 10,691
- Long Island, New York
- DesertPenguin_
@Sven Jurgens has an avater with the same character. What movie is that?
I know he has the same Avatar. It's Princess Mononoke.@Sven Jurgens has an avater with the same character. What movie is that?
Princess Mononoke, as @GTvsForza has said. The character in question is San, one of the main protagonists who is raised by a wolf clan and fighting to protect the forest she inhabits.@Sven Jurgens has an avater with the same character. What movie is that?
A film I’ve wanted to see for a while came up on Netflix the other night, even though I searched for it just a few weeks ago just to find it wasn’t there... but apparently it was added to Netflix at the weekend.
Lost In Translation by Sofia Coppola and starring Scarlet Johansson and Bill Murray tells a story about two lonely people who befriend each other in Tokyo.
I really enjoyed it, and it very much struck a chord with me, not least since I spent two weeks in Japan in 2017 and found Murray’s character scarily relatable (though I am not married and wasn’t getting paid $2 million to advertise whisky)...
What I found surprising was that the film almost seemed specially written to appeal directly to middle-aged men experiencing a mid-life crisis - but was in fact written and directed by a young female (Sofia Coppola) who is probably more like the female lead, an extremely beautiful young woman (Scarlet Johansson). Even the very first scene looked tailor-made for a male audience (a near-still shot of Johansson’s rear-end clad in sheer, see-through pink panties), and the rest of the film didn’t exactly dissuade me from the notion that I was among the target audience either.
There are one or two questionable moments - the frequent lampooning of the Japanese accent, the slightly disparaging attitude to Japanese culture in general etc., but otherwise it was a pretty good watch... not least as a middle-aged man going through a mid-life crisis. Bill Murray is, predictably, brilliant, and Johansson’s performance is excellent as well. I particularly enjoyed the film because of the dynamic between the two main characters and the slowly building friendship between them. The film really hit me on both an emotional and intellectual level - the numerous shots of SJ in her see-through panties notwithstanding.
A film I’ve wanted to see for a while came up on Netflix the other night, even though I searched for it just a few weeks ago just to find it wasn’t there... but apparently it was added to Netflix at the weekend.
Lost In Translation by Sofia Coppola and starring Scarlet Johansson and Bill Murray tells a story about two lonely people who befriend each other in Tokyo.
I really enjoyed it, and it very much struck a chord with me, not least since I spent two weeks in Japan in 2017 and found Murray’s character scarily relatable (though I am not married and wasn’t getting paid $2 million to advertise whisky)...
What I found surprising was that the film almost seemed specially written to appeal directly to middle-aged men experiencing a mid-life crisis - but was in fact written and directed by a young female (Sofia Coppola) who is probably more like the female lead, an extremely beautiful young woman (Scarlet Johansson). Even the very first scene looked tailor-made for a male audience (a near-still shot of Johansson’s rear-end clad in sheer, see-through pink panties), and the rest of the film didn’t exactly dissuade me from the notion that I was among the target audience either.
There are one or two questionable moments - the frequent lampooning of the Japanese accent, the slightly disparaging attitude to Japanese culture in general etc., but otherwise it was a pretty good watch... not least as a middle-aged man going through a mid-life crisis. Bill Murray is, predictably, brilliant, and Johansson’s performance is excellent as well. I particularly enjoyed the film because of the dynamic between the two main characters and the slowly building friendship between them. The film really hit me on both an emotional and intellectual level - the numerous shots of SJ in her see-through panties notwithstanding.
1917 was incredible. I watched Joker the other day. It was awful. I'm a comic book nerd. That's not Joker.
Call it anything else and it would have been a great movie.
Then it's great. I haven't seen it yet but is it even clear that it's part of the Batman universe?
They explicitly have Thomas Wayne, Bruce Wayne, and the death of Thomas and Martha. It felt thrown in and it could have been any generic rich guy.
Exactly. And that's my only genuine criticism of the movie. If I want to nitpick it was a bit heavy handed with the dramatics and over explaining of how messed up everything (including the main character) is/are but not everyone is an avid film viewer that picks up on things so easily.I already wish, without having seen it yet, they had left it ambiguous. Like... hey this is part of that universe if you want it to be... or not... up to you
I watched Joker the other day. It was awful
Exactly. And that's my only genuine criticism of the movie.
Then it's great. I haven't seen it yet but is it even clear that it's part of the Batman universe?