What movies have you seen lately? Now with reviews!Movies 

  • Thread starter scentedsoap
  • 8,208 comments
  • 484,936 views


All About Eve (1950) -- One f the first movies showing the 'dog-eat-dog' world that is acting and directing and producing, but taught from a very soft viewpoint. Starring Bette Davis with some awesome acting and a very solid movie all-around. The first movie to be nominated for 14 awards, only tied by Titanic, just 47 years later. The movie even has Marilyn Monroe playing a small role, as an up and coming ingenue... how about that? #74 in IMDb's Top 250. 9/10
 
Breach - low-key espionage thriller shot as a docu-drama about Eric O'Neill, a junior FBI agent drafted into the office of Robert Hanssen and told to keep an eye on him. O'Neill soon finds that everything around him is an elaborate ruse to catch Hanssen in the act of treason; Hanssen did more damage than Aldrich Ames. Even though the film spoils its own ending with the first line of dialogue, it still manages to amass a hell of a lot of tension as O'Neill tries to balance his assignment with his home life, further complicated by Hanssen's exceptionally creepy manner.
 
Over the summer, I have seen:

  • Star Trek
  • Angels and Demons
  • Terminator Salvation
  • Transformers:Revenge of the Fallen
  • The Hangover
  • Fast and Furious
  • The Taking of Pelham 123

I also watched Defiance yesterday.
 
Waltz with Bashir - Animated feature about the director himself, trying to retrace his memory of his role in the Invasion of Lebanon. At least to me, very valid perspective of conflicts in Middle East. I'm anti-war in general, and I hope this film will wake up younger people who might be supportive of meaningless wars. "B"

The Librarian: The Curse of the Judas Chalice - Don't judge me. I didn't know it was a TV movie. :crazy: I thought it was going to be a B-Movie, poking fun at itself. It was just a horribly made TV movie. Avoid. I don't give this out often...... "F"
  • Angels and Demons
I want to see that one. How did you like it?
 


Blindness (2008) -- I've been wanting to read the book for some time, and since it usually happens that you read the book and later watch the movie and think it's crap, I thought I'd go the other way around. So, first off, the book is written by José Saramago and it's directed by Fernando Meirelles (City of God), but with American actors. The movie is about a city is ravaged by an epidemic of instant "white blindness". Those first afflicted are quarantined by the authorities in an abandoned mental hospital where the newly created "society of the blind" quickly breaks down... but it's much more than that; it's also about the decay of society and how people look to take advantage of everyone else... needless to say it's a very disturbing movie, with little to no 'happily-ever-after' meaning, but more of an exploration of just how rotten society is. All in all, a great movie. 9/10
 
I really liked that one, too. I can't remember if I posted my take on it. Some what similar atmosphere to "The Happening". Not comparing the two films. ;)
 
Caught Public Enemies last night. It was a decent movie, but it annoyed me several times through out unless from 1930-1940, people were just not very bright.

~John escapes from prison. Twice. Then he escapes from a surrounded house. And between these escapes, you spend maybe 30-40 minutes until the next conflict.

~An unmarked cop can walk down a busy sidewalk with a gun for 15-20 seconds before anyone screams.

~John can be within 10 feet of the police. Nobody ever notices him.

There's a couple more things, but wow, I just came out with the perception that people were increasingly stupid in the 30's if this movie was based on a true story.
 
I want to see that one. How did you like it?

I enjoyed the movie. I have not seen the Da Vinci Code; but as my grandfather informed me--who I went to the movie with--told me, the only common thing between the two movies (and books) is the main character. I am pretty sure there were a few references to the first movie, but nothing that makes or breaks this one.

The movie is not fantastic, but it was not bad either. I went into the movie not knowing what to expect because I had neither read the books or seen the first movie. I came out of the movie enjoying what I had just watched. I really cannot comment much further than that.
 
Twilight - I haven't talk to any girls about this movie, but every guys I talked to told me Twilight is crap, do not see it. I told them I'm gonna check it out for myself, and I did. It's not bad. I guess "guys" didn't like the teen romance thing in it, but for what it is, I thought it was above average. "C+"

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
- It was little different. I think this film was about life, family, and love. I did enjoy it OK. I liked some of the actors in it, especially Captain Mike, he was excellent. I've seen the actor before, and I wouldn't have been able to guess that it was him in a million years.

Here are the things I didn't like about it:

1) When Benjamin is the old man/toddler thing, I had trouble accepting that. Then again, if this aspect of the story was normal, it really would've been another forgettable film.

2) David Fincher? Of Se7en & Fight Club? I just went over his filmography, and I guess he hasn't done much epic, classic, like the two that I mentioned. Good thing I didn't know this was by Fincher until the end credit. I might've given up on it before it was over, due to my high expectations of him.

3) I think it was around, or close to three hours long. To its credit, it didn't feel that long. But what I got from the film, three hours is at least one hour too long.

I'd give it a "B-". For the production value. Without it, I'd rated it C+ like the Twilight.

I enjoyed the movie. I have not seen the Da Vinci Code; but as my grandfather informed me--who I went to the movie with--told me, the only common thing between the two movies (and books) is the main character. I am pretty sure there were a few references to the first movie, but nothing that makes or breaks this one.

The movie is not fantastic, but it was not bad either. I went into the movie not knowing what to expect because I had neither read the books or seen the first movie. I came out of the movie enjoying what I had just watched. I really cannot comment much further than that.
You didn't hype up the film, yet still didn't deter me from seeing it. Great job! :lol:

Edit: Oh, and most people I've talked enjoyed the Da Vinci Code. I personally loved it. I thought it was a great adventure/religious thriller/suspense/action flick!
 
Last edited:
The Pianist - a good film, but by no means an entertaining one. You can tell Roman Polanski put as much of his soul into it as Steven Spielberg did with Schindler's List. Knowing that the Nazis actually did those things, it makes me want to go and see Inglorious Basterds just to see them get their come-uppance.

Twilight - I haven't talk to any girls about this movie, but every guys I talked to told me Twilight is crap, do not see it. I told them I'm gonna check it out for myself, and I did. It's not bad. I guess "guys" didn't like the teen romance thing in it, but for what it is, I thought it was above average. "C+"
As a teen romance film, it's probably fine. As a vampire film, it's an atrocity.
 
I rented two more Blu-ray movies last week, with high hopes for one and expecting less from the other. As per usual, my high hopes were slightly disappointed, while the other film impressed me considerably...

Vicky Cristina Barcelona (Woody Allen, 2008)

vicky_cristina_barcelona.jpg


After hearing positive reviews, and being a fan of Woody Allen, I had to get this out and have a look. It's a fairly interesting and insightful exploration of the nature of relationships and commitment etc., but it never quite reaches any point of substance. The film looks great - shot on location in Spain (obviously!), and the eye-candy ain't bad neither (atleast for us blokes anyway) - but the narration throughout the movie is annoying and stilted, and it didn't work for me at all. All in all, I was disappointed that I didn't enjoy the film more, and it was all over very quickly (just 90 mins long). Perhaps Woody Allen's joke sums it up best - "Boy, the food in this restaurant is terrible - and such small portions!"

6/10


Unforgiven (Clint Eastwood, 1992)

unforgiven_se.jpg


Awesome movie. Knew nothing about it before I watched it (purposefully), knowing only that it won some Oscars, and that it might warrant a watch. Nothing complex or clever about the film, just a gripping storyline and a growing expectation from gradually learning more about who the main character really is. I'm not going to say anything more about it so as not to spoil it for anyone, but as someone who typically is disinterested in the genre of 'Westerns', this film was a revelation.

9/10
 
You know, I wasn't impressed by Unforgiven, back when. My taste has matured a lot, since then. Maybe I will give it a another watch. :)
As a teen romance film, it's probably fine. As a vampire film, it's an atrocity.
I suppose. I thought it was OK, even as a vampire flick. But I've probably seen a lot more crap than you have. :D
-------------------------------------------------
Knowing - It was pretty bad. Characters kept acting irrationally, but also in the most annoying way. And the actors playing them just did a horrid job, and pretty consistently. Special effects, I guess they were acceptable, but I sure didn't like the looks of the CGs at all. I wouldn't say avoid, because I like the genre. But you won't be impressed by this. "D-"

Push - There is one scene that was funnier than most comedy films, combined. It was the scene where the girl tricks her (ex?) boyfriend to join her in the bathroom. Other than that, this is pretty much one of the worst movies you'll ever see. What's horrible about this movie? All of it, except that funny bit. "F"
 
The Hangover 8/10
Genuine laughs. Had some great little twists and some hilarious moments in it. Movie also convinced my mate to break up with his girlfriend that was mirrored by the horrible girlfriend oh too well. Clips at the end were a great way to finish off the movie aswell.

Transformers 2 7/10
A hugely entertaining movie, with some great Megan Fox scenes, battles and military hardware. But you could drive an oil tanker through some of the plot holes and then took alot of the shine off this movie.
 
Star Trek - 10/10
No I didn't just see it, I saw it the weekend after it came out. I just procrastinated posting it in this thread. I loved every second of it, although it seemed like Kirk got beat up far too much. Great special effects, great action, great storyline, everything about it was great, so much that I went back the next day to watch it again.

The Soloist - 1/10
I couldn't finish it. It did nothing but show Nathaniel's emotional turmoils. Scene after scene it just became the same after a while. And I didn't care for the psychedelic parts either. I'm sure it had a good ending but I couldn't bear to finish it.

Transformers 2 - 8/10
AWESOME! Just as good as the first one, if not better. The action scenes were the best part, what with the decepticons getting A LOT bigger for the most part. Is it just me or was Optimus Prime a lot better at fighting in this movie? In the first one he always seemed to be losing but in this one he took on three decepticons at the same time and pretty much destroyed them. I agree with what others said about the plot holes in it, which is why it didn't get a 10/10 from me.
 
The Sting (1973)

Great classic film starring Paul Newman, Robert Redford & Robert Shaw at the top of their game!

In 1930s Chicago, a young con man seeking revenge for his murdered partner teams up with a master of the big con to win a fortune from a criminal banker.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070735/

********************************************************

Pi (1988)

Great independent film shot in black and white.

Plot: A paranoid mathematician searches for a key number that will unlock the universal patterns found in nature.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0138704/
 
Unforgiven (Clint Eastwood, 1992)

unforgiven_se.jpg


Awesome movie. Knew nothing about it before I watched it (purposefully), knowing only that it won some Oscars, and that it might warrant a watch. Nothing complex or clever about the film, just a gripping storyline and a growing expectation from gradually learning more about who the main character really is. I'm not going to say anything more about it so as not to spoil it for anyone, but as someone who typically is disinterested in the genre of 'Westerns', this film was a revelation.

9/10


Myself being a western fan (down to obscure spaghetti westerns) IMO unforgiven is the last great western.
 
I saw Bruno last night. I won't comment on it except that it has a lot of funny parts, but definitely pushed the envelope waaaayyy too much doing so. 7.5/10.
 


The Lost Weekend (1945) -- The desperate life of a chronic alcoholic is followed through a four day drinking bout. And being an alcoholic and seeing the way he has thrown out his life and the opportunities it offers made me feel less and less sorry for the central character. But, being a 1940s movie, it has a happy ending and IMO it's where the movie went south. Also, the soundtrack appears to have been taken from a 1950s sci-fi/ghost movie. It's #209 in IMDb's Top 250. 6/10 (it has good acting)
 
Bruno - This has to be one of the worse films I've ever seen in my entire life, it wasn't funny, save for maybe a scene or two, and was fairly disgusting on more than one occasion. How this got 70% on Rotten Tomatoes is beyond me. Maybe my sense of humour is off, who knows. I sincerely hope this doesn't catch on like Borat did but I don't know if I want to here lines from the film for years to come.
 
Bruno - This has to be one of the worse films I've ever seen in my entire life, it wasn't funny, save for maybe a scene or two, and was fairly disgusting on more than one occasion. How this got 70% on Rotten Tomatoes is beyond me. Maybe my sense of humour is off, who knows. I sincerely hope this doesn't catch on like Borat did but I don't know if I want to here lines from the film for years to come.
Let's hear it. How many people walked during the Milli Vanilli scene?
 
Let's hear it. How many people walked during the Milli Vanilli scene?

No one, I think I might have seriously been the oldest person in the theatre. The rest were high school kids who thought it was the coolest and funniest thing they have ever seen.
 
No one, I think I might have seriously been the oldest person in the theatre. The rest were high school kids who thought it was the coolest and funniest thing they have ever seen.
:lol: I counted at least a dozen & a half people leaving our theater.

If there's 1 thing I admire, it's how Sacha showed just intolerant & ignorant people can be in the US, even if it was very weird. I don't know why so many people were that angry about it though. If they paid any attention at all to Borat (which I would suspect 90% of Bruno movie-goers to have seen), they should know there are scenes that are specifically done to poke fun at our life styles in the US. I see it as 1 on of those movies that has to go to "drastic" measures to show people's true side on topics.

HOWEVER, I will say that I do not think all of the movie made any sense to film & that it seemed to all be done just for the shock factor.
 
310-to-yuma.jpg


3:10 to Yuma 👍👍

Solid movie. It understood itself well and had a consistent and good quality ending. It was more difficult to predict than I had previously expected too. The movie sets you up for certain events that you expect to happen but don't - which is a nice change of pace.

3:10 to Yuma is about an old-west outlaw (Russell Crowe) who is captured, but needs to be escorted to a nearby town to catch a train to prison. The main escort turns out to be Christian Bale - a local rancher veteran who lost his leg at war.

The movie outlines one of many problems with keeping law-and-order in the old west. The good guys were constantly outmatched all the way through this movie - and civilians got dragged into law enforcement by their desire to maintain order.

It wasn't an amazing movie. The plot was fairly linear and didn't contain any real philosophical message. In short - the plot was just about 1 level deeper than what was on the surface. But it was fun, well acted, and well written. I can definitely recommend it.

robinhood.jpg


Disney's Robin Hood 👍👍 for under 10.

Rewatched this old classic from my childhood. I had many fond memories of this film and thought it might be fun to reconnect with that. I would still hum the tunes from this film ~20 years after I used to watch it, so at least I knew I'd be in for good music.

No. This is a movie from before the days of Pixar, back when children's movies were for children only. There's not a whole lot in this film for adults (obviously that's not the intended audience). The music was also a cut or two below what I had remembered. All in all it was an unpleasant experience to take the film that I had loved so much and watch it at a point in my life where it was more tiresome and ADD than charming and fun.

I still maintain that this is a good film for children, though it's not even perfect for that. As a child I'd never have noticed, but this movie barely does lipservice to the morality of stealing. I don't have a problem with stealing back property, but they could have made it clearer to children exactly what justified Robin Hood's theft. Instead they made it easy to take the socialist view that theft is justified when people are suffering - which is definitely something I'd want to be careful about exposing my hypothetical children to.

I still have to give this film two thumbs up based on how much I enjoyed it as a child. But watching it as an adult and comparing it to modern children's movies like Finding Nemo, The Increadibles, Monster's Inc., or Wall-E, it's clear that we've moved a step closer to perfecting children's movies since Disney's reign.

serenity1.jpg


Serenity 👍👍

In keeping with the thumbs up theme today, I re-watched Serenity last weekend. I had watched it before and had mixed feelings about it, but when I watched it previously I had not seen the television show this movie spawns from (Firefly) - so I had no investment in the characters, or in the particular... flavor of the show.

Watching Firefly is definitely a pre-requisite to watching Serenity. Firefly is a short-lived television series that lasts only 14 episodes. It was killed off primarily because the episodes were originally aired out of order - which made following the show very difficult and killed ratings. It is a quality sci-fi TV show, though, and is available to watch for free anytime on Hulu.com. I very much enjoyed the show and was quite shocked to discover that it had been cancelled so early. Its popularity translated into the full-feature film "Serentiy", but Serentiy suffers the burden of covering the entire television show's grand plot in just one film - which it does an admirable job of. The problem is that you don't get much time to be invested in the characters since the plot is constantly being pushed further.

The first time I watched this movie, I had trouble getting attached to any of the characters. That lack of attachment led to a fairly lukewarm review. After watching the television show the attachment was there - and so the movie simply laid out the solid, creative plot that the show's writers had envisioned. I wish that they had not been required to cram their creativity into one film, but I'll take what I can get.

Reccommendation: If you liked Han Solo, you'll like Malcolm Reynolds, Firefly, and Serentiy. Definitely watch the 14 Firefly episodes before watching Serentiy. All of this is available to you today at no additional cost since Firefly is free on Hulu.com and Serenity is available on "Watch Now" on Netflix.
 
Last edited:
Reccommendation: If you liked Han Solo, you'll like Malcolm Reynolds, Firefly, and Serentiy. Definitely watch the 14 Firefly episodes before watching Serentiy. All of this is available to you today at no additional cost since Firefly is free on Hulu.com and Serenity is available on "Watch Now" on Netflix.
👍

I rented Firefly on Netflix based off of a recommendation from Famine. Before I finished the first Disc I had already ordered the box set and Serenity from Amazon. Really, I was ready to spend the cash before the pilot was over.
 
Last edited:
:yup:

I rented Firefly on Netflix based off of a recommendation from Famine. Before I finished the first Disc I had already ordered the box set and Serenity from Amazon. Really, I was ready to spend the cash before the pilot was over.

I was ready NOT to like firefly, as it came recommended to me by someone who I rarely agree with on movies and I had already seen Serenity and been lukewarm about it. I still don't quite know why I watched the first episode, but I'm glad I did because it allowed me to rediscover the series.

Agreed that after the first episode you're ready to watch them all.
 
looks like I have to add a bit more to me to-watch list.



The Secret Adventures of Tom Thumb (1993) -- A boy born the size of a small doll is kidnapped by a genetic lab and must find a way back to his father; with that setting you can imagine we're not in for your average movie. In fact, it isn't at all, clocking at 57 minutes, it's more like a long short, it has little dialogue (unless you count grunting) and a lot of clay animation. A must-see if you like Jan Svankmajer-styled movies. Also, very well taught, if a tad dizzying after a while. I liked it. 7/10
 
I rented Firefly on Netflix based off of a recommendation from Famine...
I was ready NOT to like firefly... but...
And to round out the trifecta, I watched Firefly when it aired on FOX and was one of the outraged when it was canned. I currently own the box set, but the only time I've seen Serenity was in the theater. :indiff: For $17, I might have to make up for that any grab it on BR.

Edit: I agree completely with you on the old Disney movies, Danoff. I re-watched The Fox and the Hound about a year ago and was bored out of my mind.
 
I had never heard of Firefly, even after the theatrical trailer of Serenity. I remember seeing the trailer, thinking how this was the worst Sci Fi trailer I've ever seen.

Then I rented it when it was out on DVD. Actually, I still hadn't heard of the TV series, I did fall in love with Serenity.

One day, browsing the DVD section at Target, I notice this SF TV series on sale for $15....... It's called Firefly, but it has the familiar faces from Serenity? It was a steal, and it was damn good.

So, for me, I didn't have to watch the TV series first to like the film. But I would definitely agree that would be the preferable way to go.
___________________________________________________________

The Fall - It's a very simple film..... but my crappy narrative won't do it justice.



It's one of the most beautiful film I've ever seen, visually. While it is not as epic as the visual, or the trailer suggests, it is most definitely worth a rental. "A+" I can overlook any shortcomings, I found it that beautiful.
 
I still love The Jungle Book...well, I still love Baloo.

Although, they are still great kids films. My friend's two-year-old son watches Robin Hood non-stop and will even act out certain things, the two-year-old equivelant of quoting movies.

As for the Disney/Pixar years, I believe that The Escapist's Movie Bob explains why the Pixar stuff works so well: Their main protagonists are often older than teenagers males. It's target audience, while still entertaining to kids, is men. Kids find it fun, but it talks to men.

Here's the link, but it has some language at the beginning as he explains Up is the only bright spot this summer. And if you haven't seen Up: SPOILER WARNING.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/escape-to-the-movies/755-Up
 
Back