Maybe fixing an entry in a lookup array is easier than finding something that breaks the UI in the middle of an event when the UI doesn't break in similar events.They took a week to fix the tire wear issue that made a mission (with a one time low credit reward) effectively unplayable for some.
They took a whole month to fix the rain radar that made Spa (repeatable 1.5mil event) effectively unplayable for some.
See, I'd lend some credence to this argument, but Forza Horizon also exists. With tyre temp/pressure simulation if you bring up telemetry. From five years ago no less. The FH series is probably the epitome of "sim-cade" but still gets tyre modeling somewhat correct, even if they lean more into the arcade part of simcade.Assetto Corsa is more of a simulation than GT7. Your average GT player isn't really concerned with things like tire temp and pressure. I'm sure the majority, myself included struggle with car setups. Also, ACC only has 2 classes of cars, both race cars to worry about modeling tires for. Whereas GT7 has everything from low powered street cars to Gr1 and F1. People complained that running a no stop race was too easy, so PD responded with more tire wear. As I said with the variety of cars it probably isn't as easy to implement as many would believe.
I came here to say this.They took a week to fix the tire wear issue that made a mission (with a one time low credit reward) effectively unplayable for some.
And to be fair, their netcode has never been that great in any game, even GTS. It's not like they're working from a base system that is highly effective and they just need to squash some bugs. They're probably squashing bugs at the same time as fighting the innate limitations of their system.For stuff like lobby issues, there could be some underlying problems within the netcode that they just haven't been able to figure out.
Pointing out that people are hinging their arguments off words never used and aiming their anger at the wrong responsible party is not defending "this".
Going after PD for your interpretation of what Sony said doesn't make sense. Go after PD for not adding selling cars yet like it said it would do "near-term" six months ago.
While this is a good idea, why do I feel that there's gonna be a lot of censorship or post deletion by them?Don’t take this the wrong way as I thoroughly enjoy the community here and believe it is an invaluable resource for fans of the franchise. The simple fact that PD doesn’t run their own forum on their own website to communicate with their customers really gives the perception that they don’t actually care what we think. Then when they do make changes that do not align with what the player-base has vocally expressed a desire for, it only reinforces that perception. As far as we know, PD doesn’t monitor what happens here at all. THAT is their biggest problem at the moment.
Yep. The problem really was the ffb was crap on release, then it was changed... if it had been good on release, that we know they can do in GTS, this erroneous perception could not exist.Bolded the problematic part. The vocal part of people is so often comprised of such morons that it's just good that they get ignored.
The textbook example of this being the FFB disaster we're still suffering from. The original FFB in GT7 was a poor showing, then it was completely revamped and became great in one night, but the small amount of extremely loud people who have little to no idea about how the steering feel dynamically changes with speed and downforce loading - and who think that heavy FFB automatically equals good FFB - made so much noise in every available channel that PD was forced to revert the changes and come up with the emergency lie about reducing power to prevent injury. It was a legitimate FFB update and the correct thing, from the developer's point of view, would have been to keep it and tell the complainers to 🤬 off but of course it would have been extremely bad PR so they had no other choice than to go back to the previous version and ruin the experience for everyone because a small minority screamed loud enough.
I do think tyre temps should be included though - and it has been before (GT4?)Assetto Corsa is more of a simulation than GT7. Your average GT player isn't really concerned with things like tire temp and pressure.
What a stupid "I don't like the game and noone else is allowed to enjoy it either"-take is this please?I'll be convincing all leagues that I'm in that they should not be using GT7 as a platform. So far I've been 100% successful in this.
Yep. HTH! like any other nexus, I lead, people follow. Does it burn?What a stupid "I don't like the game and noone else is allowed to enjoy it either"-take is this please?
...that PD are able to quickly fix issues and release a patch any time they want/need, not just as a monthly thing and not part of a trickle feed of additional content.
So this means with the current and well documented serious issues, PD either somehow don't know about them (!?), don't care about them or are not able to fix them and/or have completely wrong priorities and resources allocated within their business.
I find this disturbing.
Nah, it's more that when they do have a quick fix there's nothing stopping them from putting it more or less straight out. The Tomahawk and engine ticket glitches seem like they involved relatively complex systems that bled over into other parts of the game, so a quick fix may or may not have been on the cards.But taking your theories at face value, PD also could have patched the Tomahawk Glitch in a matter of hours as with the engine ticket glitch 🤷🏼♂️
Benefit how? We're talking about bugs and patching, so by definition the player is already at a detriment thanks to the issues with the game. Some bugs are to be expected, but fixing them is also to be expected and I'm not sure I'd label streamlining the bug patching process as a benefit. That's just Game Support 101, it's expected as part of the purchase price of a AAA game.They’ll figure it out, and we’ll benefit.
Online players complain and get the whole game changed every update
Every complaint is about online. All the updates favour online racing then effectively they go out there way to change how the cars general set up’s are. Why do you think every time there’s an update all of the pp points change and the gear ratios that where set are all adjusted.Update 1.21 proves that how exactly?
Good.All the updates favour online racing
These are the patch notes for 1.21. Nothing about online, PP updates or gear ratio changes.Every complaint is about online. All the updates favour online racing then effectively they go out there way to change how the cars general set up’s are. Why do you think every time there’s an update all of the pp points change and the gear ratios that where set are all adjusted.
The handling and gear ratios keep changing.These are the patch notes for 1.21. Nothing about online, PP updates or gear ratio changes.
PP updates are attempts by PD to stop people exploiting the Tomahawk for grinding credits. Where are the complaints from online players about gear ratios?
I also wouldn't say "Every complaint is about online". Most othe complaints around here are about single player content.
View attachment 1191740
The handling and gear ratios keep changing.
Funny how a AAA game that is only able to be played with an online connection is still practically unbearable to play online 6mo later.Online players complain and get the whole game changed every update
But why do they keep messing about with cars handling every update.
Because if players keep getting "free money", that renders the pedantically crafted MTX economy useless. It's really that simple.Going back to recognizing patterns though, it seems like they focus more on player exploits than actual problems.