- 5,588
- Dahlonega, GA
- ryzno
Any reasons?Barack Obama.
Any reasons?Barack Obama.
Any reasons?
Who are these enemies, where are the WMD's and when did they say what you just typed?He is responsible for allowing weapons of mass destruction to the enemies who openly chant death to America and Israel, which provides a potential threat of war, which could see millions of lives destroyed. There has never been a nuclear war, and who builds them to keep them in a trophy cabinet? All it takes is one, be it purposely or by mistake.
No matter what, history always seems to repeat itself.
...to the enemies who openly chant death to America and Israel,
He is responsible for allowing weapons of mass destruction to the enemies...
Well that's a big pile of unsubstantiated nonsense. Not that I really expected anything different.He is responsible for allowing weapons of mass destruction to the enemies who openly chant death to America and Israel, which provides a potential threat of war, which could see millions of lives destroyed. There has never been a nuclear war, and who builds them to keep them in a trophy cabinet? All it takes is one, be it purposely or by mistake.
No matter what, history always seems to repeat itself.
Agreed, but more because I don't see the repercussions doing anything but restoring what it was prior to the deal.To be fair, I find the deal Obama made with Iran a bit of a joke.
"World" is a stretch but throw in Ian Watkins of the Lostprophets for worst in the UK. His case is unspeakably wicked.
there must, sadly, be other people who commit the same crimes in greater quantities.
Nukes aren't the only weapons of mass destruction. Convential weapons atop long range or ballistic missles are also WMD's. Iran claimed they weren't building nuclear weapons and the U.S. was adamant that Iran wasn't building nuclear weapons, before the agreement. So how are they giving anything up if they weren't working on nukes to begin with. The rest of your post, then, is utterly irrelevant.Setting aside that six countries entered in the agreement with Iran, which means that it's absurd to suggest that Obama is solely responsible for it, there's also the part where you're demonstrably wrong. Iran hasn't been allowed to obtain WMDs, they've had to give them up.
The rest of your post, then, is utterly irrelevant.
No. If it's not nuclear, chemical or biological, there's no way it can be a weapon of mass destruction.Nukes aren't the only weapons of mass destruction. Convential weapons atop long range or ballistic missles are also WMD's.
A selection of whom are dead, so ineligible.Just a short list of the people that I find to be among the worst.
Those who've nominated people like Bush have at the least provided arguments that involve killing (in the Middle East) and torturing (in Abu Ghraib and Gitmo) sanctioned by their administration - rather than not agreeing with them...To me, those who kill and torture are far worst than some president or political figure you may not agree with
Just a short list of the people that I find to be among the worst.
Giles De Rais
Andrei Chikatilo
Colin Ireland
Harold Shipman
Jack The Ripper
Javed Iqbal
Jeffrey Dahmer
Ted Bundy
Joachim Kroll
Richard Chase
Nukes aren't the only weapons of mass destruction.
Convential weapons atop long range or ballistic missles are also WMD's.
50 U.S. Code §2902[2] The terms "weapons of mass destruction" and "WMD" mean chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, and chemical, biological, and nuclear materials used in the manufacture of such weapons.
Iran claimed they weren't building nuclear weapons and the U.S. was adamant that Iran wasn't building nuclear weapons, before the agreement.
So how are they giving anything up if they weren't working on nukes to begin with.
The rest of your post, then, is utterly irrelevant.
Meanwhile, Iran, post lifting of sanctions and an influx of $100Billion, an agreement not possible, most likely, without U.S. (Obama) cooperation:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/14/politics/iran-rocket-launch/
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-missiles-idUSKCN0WB0I9
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/09/middleeast/iran-missile-test/
CNNU.S. officials said that the first tests did not violate the nuclear agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), but were very likely in breach of a U.N. resolution calling on Iran not to undertake ballistic missile activity.
And this of course, written on one of their ballistic missles during a recent test:
I do, yes. If you can kill hundreds of people with the push of a button I consider that a weapon of mass destruction.No. If it's not nuclear, chemical or biological, there's no way it can be a weapon of mass destruction.
Last year, Russia had attacked ISIS with long range cruise missiles. Do you think it counts as a use of WMD?
I do, yes. If you can kill hundreds of people with the push of a button I consider that a weapon of mass destruction.
I nominate Luis garavito. Rapist and child serial killer.
I nominate Milton Friedman as the worst human who has lived in the last 50 years.
Everyone who promotes, buys, sells or uses a diesel engined vehicle.
The 🤬 that posted pics of terminally ill children in sexual poses in chan.
Names please, people.Everyone who promotes, buys, sells or uses a diesel engined vehicle.
Actually, I'll add Hiram Maxim and Albert Einstein to my list of the worst people who ever lived.Give it a rest.