Standard cars should look like premium cars, I'm pretty sure PD agrees with me on that. The only problem is that it takes a lot of work ( = a lot of money) to make it happen.
On topic: The GT HD Impreza is not in GT5 because it's not a premium car. It looks a lot better than the standard, but it's not premium quality.
![]()
Here's a pic of the Subaru, it's pretty obviously a low-quality Premium, but that still doesn't explain why it's missing.
GT6 better answer all of our questions, damnit.
My guess would be that the cars in GT-HD were not modelled to a high enough standard to be a premium car.
My guess would be that the cars in GT-HD were not modelled to a high enough standard to be a premium car.
Correct.
Its level of quality is inbetween standard and premium. Its like a gran turismo 4.5 car. they couldn't put it in the premium dealership as its sub standard, the car really had no place in this game.
Besides, are you really splitting hairs over this 1 rally car? Of all the cars that SHOULD be premium youve got a thread about this. cmon
![]()
Here's a pic of the Subaru, it's pretty obviously a low-quality Premium, but that still doesn't explain why it's missing.
GT6 better answer all of our questions, damnit.
![]()
Here's a pic of the Subaru, it's pretty obviously a low-quality Premium, but that still doesn't explain why it's missing.
GT6 better answer all of our questions, damnit.
I don't care if it's a low-quality Premium. It had some nice details, and is more accurate to the real Subari Impreza Rally Car, compared to the PS2 version of the Subaru used in GT3 and GT4. But I do have to agree with you about GT6. I would like GT6 to be like GT4 and GT5 combined.
It's still better than the standard version...
Correct.
Its level of quality is inbetween standard and premium. Its like a gran turismo 4.5 car. they couldn't put it in the premium dealership as its sub standard, the car really had no place in this game.
Besides, are you really splitting hairs over this 1 rally car? Of all the cars that SHOULD be premium youve got a thread about this. cmon
Agreed, why not just include the 2009 cars alongside the 2010 ones? And why did MWR not just put Truex Jr.'s #56 in? Why not have the option to paint the cars in alternate schemes (even if they are fantasy) to vary things up in online races?
It's all very frustrating indeed! And I'm sorry to whoever the poor chaps were that had to paint and model all of those cars! Still... I can't help but feel that it might not have been entirely PD's fault (NASCAR Licensing requirement?), with the exception that it was their fault that the game took so long to release... but if they had gone another two years of development, what would've happened then???
*sigh*
ERIC11940Well, if PD hadn't made GT HD and GT5: Prologue, then it wouldn't take more then 5 years to finnish GT5, and the game would have been release in 2008-2009. It's just my thought cuz I think GT5 should had been released earlier then it was.
Agreed. While I enjoy GT5 I find it ridiculous Kaz wanted another 2 years for development. And GT6 better be better at launch. Kaz admitted it was released as an unfinisged game, but why work on two other games while making GT5. I still believe in him though, hopefully his new updates and DLCs will shine bright.
Don't forget the 800 degree hand animation..
I'm loving that 800 degree animation![]()
Don't forget the 800 degree hand animation..
Also note how the car suspension seems to dip more realistically.
In GT5 it compress "kinda" slow compare to the real thing.
Regarding the Impreza, it's not a premium in the GTHD video, just a more detailed standard. Making it premium would require starting over from scratch just like with any other car. Still, they could replace the current standard model with this more detailed model...
Maybe the file got corrupted and they didn't want to remodel the car? Trust me, it happens.![]()