- 7
- Switzerland
- IraDeorum
Unfortunately, the answer will be still no.Try to understand what forums and threads are for so that you won't ask that kind of question in a thread like this.
Unfortunately, the answer will be still no.Try to understand what forums and threads are for so that you won't ask that kind of question in a thread like this.
ThinkTwiceUnfortunately, the answer will be still no.
I'll add to Porsche's (Volkswagen's) aspirational thinking, in that the brand survives with the Boxer, Cayenne Pepper, Panamera and Cayman bringing in new customers. The 911 on its own, wouldn't satisfy shareholders in this day and age. I just wish I knew why Porsche have the blinders on.
JohnnypensoPorsche is a car manufacturer that doubles as a money making machine. That's why they have blinders on and their blinders are made with $100 bills..which they burn to light cigars...because people line up to buy 911's...lol..
And that's the reason why it was said to be the most profitable automaker?
On that we will have to agree to disagree.
Ruf do modify Porsche models, but they also manufacture their own models, its worth noting that the Ruf chassis numbers are just that, they are true VIN numbers not simply a build number.
SuperCobraJetThe VIN is the build number I'm referring too.
Like Ruf, Shelby cars have their own VIN numbers, unless they are conversions of already titled cars.
The sub license for Turn 10 and EA are a traded. They trade Porsche with Ferrari.
Audi's are nicely made cars for people who really wanted a BMW or a Merc but who can't a) drive or b) afford one
Because there was no such deal between EA and T10.How can you even make that kind of a trade? They must have approval from both makes for anything like this. Why Sony cannot do the deal then?
This...makes no sense at all.
Anecdotal evidence aside, which is essentially meaningless anyway, 15 years into GT and Porsche is the most profitable car company in the world on a per-car basis. Hard to make any case that not being in GT has affected them in any way. If it means anything, there are many more Porsches than there are of just about any other supercar make here in my hometown, outside of Corvettes.
15 years into GT and Porsche is the most profitable car company in the world on a per-car basis.
And if that is the only VIN they carry (as is the case for standalone Ruf models) then they are not a Ford, just as an Ruf is not a Porsche.
In the case of Ruf models that is simply not the case.However as we both know, the base product is a Ford and a Porsche.
In fact of reality, these cars are no more than modified versions of the original base product and are quite easily identifiable as such.
They just carry a VIN and badging from the modifier.
Then by your own logic here its an Oldsmobile.The Shelby Series One roadster was an exception to this, in that it was a Shelby designed and built car from the ground up.
The only "other" car manufacturer's part used in it was the Oldsmobile engine.
In the case of Ruf models that is simply not the case.
If the only Porsche part used is the unmarked chassis and the remainder parts are either customer built or sourced by Ruf then how is it a modified Porsche?
Simply answer is that its not.
Ruf have not taken a Porsche product and modified it to make an Ruf model in decades (they still modify Porsche models - but that is a different thing).
You may want to consider it a modified Porsche, but that doesn't make it one.
Then by your own logic here its an Oldsmobile.
Chassis and base engine block are the only carry overs for the vast majority of the Ruf range (and in a number such as the RGT-8 the engine is Ruf designed and built).I think, you answered your own question.
The base product is designed and built by Porsche. (Body/chassis)
As is the engine used.
The same with the Shelby Mustang.
That being the case, it is practically impossible to seperate the obvious original
manufacturer from the finished product.
It maybe more accurate to say, these cars are modified versions of the base car.
Thats because Porsche builds the same base model car as does Ford.
Both are modified when built by Ruf and Shelby to enhance performance, as compared to the builds Ford and Porsche produce.
To the contrary, I mention this example to point out, the Shelby Series One is not a base car under production from another manufacturer.
It is an original designed and built Shelby car.
Therefore it is not a "seperate build" of anyone elses base car.
The engine however is designed and built by Oldsmobile. but it is the "only" other manufacturer piece that was used.
If anecdotal evidence is tossed aside, then your home-town quantities are also meaningless. But you knew that anyway, and mine was a personal example that suggested further information is needed, not one that "proves" anything on its own.
The omission of Porsches from Gran Turismo has undoubtably had an effect. We can argue about whether the effect is minor, significant, relegated to the future, bad for prestige, good for prestige, bad for brand placement and on and on ... but there's an effect just the same. We know this much purely from the raw numbers of Gran Turismo owners, and the fact that they haven't been exposed to Porsche cars in the same way they have to other brands. To argue that "not being in GT has [not] affected them in any way" is essentially to stand up in front of the billions spent yearly on advertising and scream "you do nothing". It does do something. Brand exposure and product exposure sells.
And? I mean, it's a great achievement for the company (not so much for the customers), and it does suggest that current Porsche buyers are willing to pay a premium, but outside of that, what does it have to do with the effects of Porsche not being in Gran Turismo? How does that relate to the Gran Turismo discussion at hand? How does it reveal anything other than possible complacency or recalcitrance on Porsche's behalf?
As I said in the beginning we will have to agree to disagree ion this one, but from a legal point of view they are unique models and for the purposes of licensing (which is what we are talking about) your opinion on the matter (and mine) is moot.
No doubt.
As far as GT, even though Porsche cars are not in the game, the Rufs still provide the experience
of driving a high performance rear engine car, which is unique to the two brands.
It's one of those things that we'd all love to have but, more than likely won't. The chances are that we'll have ample platforms in which to chose from, enough to keep us busy for quite some time.No doubt. As far as GT, even though Porsche cars are not in the game, the Rufs still provide the experience of driving a high performance rear engine car, which is unique to the two brands.
That's the thing I say everytime when this theme is actual. Why not finally use the RUF license when they have almost every single car from Porsche, but modified for better. And Dauer 962 LM for Porsche racing car fans.I mostly don't care about Porsches in GT6,we have RUFs and they are nice cars.If PD put a bunch of new RUFs like CTR3,RT12 and such it will be great.Don't you think?
RUF doesn't have cars like the 356, 550, 914, 928, 944 and all the race cars.Why not finally use the RUF license when they have almost every single car from Porsche, but modified for better.
Why not finally use the RUF license when they have almost every single car from Porsche, but modified for better. And Dauer 962 LM for Porsche racing car fans.
RUFs are Porsches, just as much as a Kardashian is a human being. Wait, bad example.