Would you rather?

  • Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 972,893 views
In a similar manner, the 240SX isn't sold where I am. For that reason price is irrelevant. Also the outputs are irrelevant because it's incredibly highly unlikely these cars are going to be left stock. The SR20 has a superior aftermarket.
Even then, they would still be fairly similar. Obviously price will vary depending on where you're from.
 
Shelby

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$500 1991 BMW 850I
Class-C-24-Hours-of-LeMons-Arse-Freeze-626x426.jpg


OR

$500 1993 Mazda RX-7
24-Hours-of-LeMons-North-Dallas-Hooptie-Winners-Organizers-Choice-2-626x426.jpg
 
The RX-7, because it's less painful to see it in such conditions. But still, it does look really fun to drive in that picture.
 
Merkur XR4Ti vs. Chevrolet Citation X-11 vs. Shelby CSX - Merkur, although it was close between the Shelby and the Merkur.

Results:
1. Merkur XR4Ti
2. Shelby CSX
3. Chevrolet Citation X-11

BMW 850i vs. Mazda RX-7 - RX-7, it would be cheaper to restore.

Honda Civic DX vs. Nissan 240SX SE vs. Mitsubishi Eclipse RS - Eclipse, these actually look pretty nice.

Results:
1. Mitsubishi Eclipse
2. Nissan 240SX SE
3. Honda Civic DX

Jaguar XJ220 TWR vs. Jaguar XJR-15 - XJ220, although the XJ220 TWR and the XJR-15 are ugly.
 
$500 cars

RX-7. It doesn't look that bad for the price.

Poor man's car

A bit harder but I'll take the Eclipse

Super-Jags

The TWR XJ220 looks way better and it's way faster
 
They ruined the headlights by outlining them. And headlights make up a lot of the car's beauty to me (unless it has a nice rear.)
WHAT?! All because of silly headlight outlines that really aren't that noticable?! :crazy:

Also, for the 500 dollar cars, I would pick the BMW (I forgot about these before, oops). I would fix the 850 up and it would be awesome.
 
Back