Would you rather?

  • Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 972,884 views
The Jaguar XJ220 is beautiful. Anyone who says otherwise shall have their head chopped off.
This is beautiful.
Jaguar_XJ220_Rene_Staud.jpg


This is ugly.
jaguar-xj220-s-twr.jpg
 
Jaguar. The shooting brake design just...doesn't work on that Mustang. Maybe it's the color, though...
 
What do you find horrendous about it?
Although, I'm somehow not surprised considering the fact that seem to prefer old land yachts and pickup trucks over sportier stuff.

It's not aggressive. It's flat. It's smooth. The wheels look dumb. It just looks too soft for me. And too long. Just flat out don't like it.
 
I love both, but the Torino takes the cake. Too many of GM's performance cars used the same platform. I mean there has got to be at least 30 of them that use almost the exact same parts with different engines and names.
 
Buick GS vs Torino: Buick, it was actually a little quicker than the Torino. (assuming the GS is a Stage 1 455 car)

Ferrari.
 
I wouldn't call a Torino "rare" by any means.

Compared to the Buick and its related cars, it's incredibly rare. I can only recall seeing two Torinos. One at a classic car dealership outside without paint that I sat in (and I'm told I looked badass in it :lol:) and a perfect one at a Concours car show.
 
Shooting Brake desings

Jag obviously, there's just no question about this one

Buick vs. Torino

Torino. Is better looking

Ferrari vs. Lancia

Lancia. Cheaper, sexier and it's a Lancia. Plus they are re-badged, or at least looks like it.
 

Latest Posts

Back