This made me curious, and I was surprised to learn they built the Pantera through 1992. I'm not quite sure what to make of the final exterior update though. It kind of gets away with hiding the fact that it's a design from the early 70s, but the extra bodywork still looks tacked on....and if memory serves, the Pantera switched to Windsors (302, 351W) in 1990.
Yes, the Pantera had a rather long production run. It's hilarious that it lasted until 1992 but I don't think De Tomaso were able to invest in a brand new model. I don't think it's aged that badly and I'd happily own one. It'd be easier to live with than a Countach.This made me curious, and I was surprised to learn they built the Pantera through 1992. I'm not quite sure what to make of the final exterior update though. It kind of gets away with hiding the fact that it's a design from the early 70s, but the extra bodywork still looks tacked on. View attachment 1081192
View attachment 1081190View attachment 1081191
I'm not the biggest fan of the Pantera, but I care less for them as they veered away from Tjaarda's original design. The one concession I make is for the maligned rubber bumpers of the later American cars, which I don't hate. They're my least favorite classic era De Tomaso, with the Mangusta it replaced being my favorite. I appreciate the Pantera, but I'm not nuts about them.This made me curious, and I was surprised to learn they built the Pantera through 1992. I'm not quite sure what to make of the final exterior update though. It kind of gets away with hiding the fact that it's a design from the early 70s, but the extra bodywork still looks tacked on. View attachment 1081192
View attachment 1081190View attachment 1081191
This was the basis for the electric tzero; a car that Elon Musk was eager to see go into production but never did.Saw this kit car at a show in Detroit today. Don’t know anything about it.View attachment 1082923View attachment 1082924View attachment 1082925View attachment 1082926View attachment 1082928
Heh.Well, it's definitely a bike engine.
I'm fairly certain it's not a Kawi motor in the red car, though. Looks like an oil-cooled Gixxer cam cover.
Just sharing my amusement at the fact that the electric version also came saddled with a motorcycle engine rather than suggesting it was sourced from the same bike.I'm fairly certain it's not a Kawi motor in the red car, though. Looks like an oil-cooled Gixxer cam cover.
Mercurys, because it's a proper name, and I'm compelled to further clarify that the Mercury Meteor was an American car; what you've posted is a Meteor Montcalm.I knew about Canadian Mercuries, but not this specific one. The 1961 Canadian Mercury Meteor, and its weird lighting.
Over here, the last Toyota Yaris was a rebadged Mazda 2 before the Yaris was discontinued.Saw one of these in traffic today and wondered why somebody had plastered Mazda badges on a new Yaris:
View attachment 1197760
Did some Googling and found out its a Mazda 2 Hybrid. Guessing this is similar to Suzuki where their EU fleet doesn't have a low enough CO2 average, so they cherry picked some hybrids from Toyota and voila. At least Suzuki kind of attempted to restyle their version of the RAV4 and the Corolla estate, and both of those are so vanilla that they do blend into the rest of the range if you weren't paying attention.
The base car is so far removed from Mazda's design language however, that I think even someone with no knowledge of cars whatsoever would look at it and realise that it doesn't quite gel with everything else at the dealership, particularly the one it borrows it's name from. One of the laziest rebadges I think I've seen in modern times, though it doesn't matter since clearly somebody bought one, so... ¯\(ツ)/¯
Do you guys not get the actual Mazda 2?Saw one of these in traffic today and wondered why somebody had plastered Mazda badges on a new Yaris:
View attachment 1197760
Did some Googling and found out its a Mazda 2 Hybrid. Guessing this is similar to Suzuki where their EU fleet doesn't have a low enough CO2 average, so they cherry picked some hybrids from Toyota and voila. At least Suzuki kind of attempted to restyle their version of the RAV4 and the Corolla estate, and both of those are so vanilla that they do blend into the rest of the range if you weren't paying attention.
The base car is so far removed from Mazda's design language however, that I think even someone with no knowledge of cars whatsoever would look at it and realise that it doesn't quite gel with everything else at the dealership, particularly the one it borrows it's name from. One of the laziest rebadges I think I've seen in modern times, though it doesn't matter since clearly somebody bought one, so... ¯\(ツ)/¯
Oh we do, which makes it all the more confusing that they badged a completely different car with the same nameplate that has no visual similarities whatsoever. Would be a bit more understandable if we didn't get the actual 2 or they'd stopped selling it here, but... no. Both are on sale at the same time, which I just find bizarre.Do you guys not get the actual Mazda 2?
View attachment 1198040
Saying that, I don't recall a hybrid version, so maybe I answered my own question.
From the Mazda website:Do you guys not get the actual Mazda 2?
View attachment 1198040
Saying that, I don't recall a hybrid version, so maybe I answered my own question.
The '97-up front end is bad enough but those headlights are absolute ass.Saw one of these in traffic today. Didn't know Jeep made a 2-door Cherokee. And now I really want one.
It's like they tried to make it a WJ GC.Let's not forget the tragety of the Chinese Cherokee either:
View attachment 1208645
I know they at least sold it as the BAW Qishi and the Beijing Jeep 2500, but given the Chinese market there might be more iterations of it. They sold it there until 2014, meaning it stuck around for over 30 years.
*Edit, I can't spell
Yeah, I just looked for a clear shot at a good angle on Google. I totally agree with you on those style LED lights (what's worse is to see LED projectors on true classic cars ), but I actually don't mind the front end conversion - I didn't even realize it was converted! Given your description, though, I'm surprised the 2-doors aren't more common than they are. The four-door XJs are still everywhere in Colorado. And come to think of it, I have seen a couple Comanches kicking around.The '97-up front end is bad enough but those headlights are absolute ass.
The one you posted may or may not have the original front end. Though production volume was low, the 2-door was produced until the end of the XJ run. 1984-1996 Cherokees, 2- or 4-door, all had similar front ends (they got softer and were painted in the later years, but the "bones" were the same), which they shared with the Comanche. The XJs were facelifted in 1997 to have the styling of the one you posted, but the Comanche was gone by then, so if you see a Comanche with that front end, it has been converted.^ Passport/Rodeo vibes...
Yeah, I just looked for a clear shot at a good angle on Google. I totally agree with you on those style LED lights (what's worse is to see LED projectors on true classic cars ), but I actually don't mind the front end conversion - I didn't even realize it was converted! Given your description, though, I'm surprised the 2-doors aren't more common than they are. The four-door XJs are still everywhere in Colorado. And come to think of it, I have seen a couple Comanches kicking around.