No its 100% relevant for me.
Yeah but what's relevant to me and you, our priorities wants and needs are not relevant.
What is relevant is that an E-Sport platform be a level playing field for everybody playing, unfair advantages are not in the best intrest of the title.
And a way around it (that doesn't involve the clutch or shifter) has already been found. PD's 'fairness' fix has already been defeated.
I guess its an ongoing battle eh
How hard would it have been to simply lock out H-Patterns from those events? Or speed up the shifts?
Because TA and OL is still competitive. And things working that significantly differently based on mode is IMO silly.
Those are easy and logical fixes, this is a kneejerk reaction that has in reality fixed nothing.
The playing field is level and all the many tired of the unfair advantage given to clutch users think its a welcome fix to a loop hole...
Pity it actually isn't now.
It sure is as far as the cheesy loop hole is now closed.
Now the slow shifting is something that needs to be looked for a speed up IMO but PD may think its fine slow. Either way their loop hole closing sure did make it more fair.
If you only thought NOW there is an issue, sorry to say welcome aboard the PD speed up those shifts bandwagon. I am glad until PD do if ever they do, its more fair now than its been.
Given that I can give you a list of titles that have managed to do this and have it work, as well as the fact that an exploit has already been found in PD's 'fix' that undermines this more than a little.
Each game is different, just play those if you want to use your clutch the way you like. Gran Turismo has a issue with slow shifting cars. Its just now a problem for everybody.
To you, not to me. Each and every one of us purchases a title for a specific reason and you're valid use doesn't overide mine or anyone's else.
Those reasons dont matter. Mine or yours. PD has its own vision its own objectives priorities n all that.
It about mutual respect and the AUP, you agreed to it when you joined, re-reading it may be an good idea.
Im sorry if youve at all felt uh not sure what to put here, Ill leave it black, you fill it however you like.
In sorry if you've at all felt _______, I have no intentions to ________ you. So far my biggest "digs" have been cry me a river, no sympathies and boo hoo. Hardly anything to get mad at other than you dont like my position. I dont like yours, so I guess that makes us even (0_0) ?
Nope, not facts, simply unneeded digs (and some misogyny - well done)
Ouch that was some HARD CORE stuff, Im sorry about that Bud, didnt mean to hurt your feelings. Those were in fact Digs, unneeded Digs on top of it. Im ashamed of myself.
Misogyny, what because I dont have a vagina?
Its not fair for all, because as has been pointed out its rendered the H-Pattern useless in every part of the title and already has been exploited.
Not sure if you understand what fairness means Bruh. Your just bit-----complaining about how you don't like how slow the shifts are, Welcome to the club, now you know what driving these cars without a clutch is like. Hit the shift and a year later the gear change is made.
Its Now fair because your in the club too with no more clutch pass to get around it anymore
Kinda getting pleased now thinking about it
but that's mean.
Nope. Its an example of the exact same logic as you are using. You demand a level playing field in one regard, why not in other regards? All cars should be forced to use the driver aids they have in reality, only one view should be used, etc, etc.
No no, that's absurd, funny and a few other words too if only these titles could get by on the niche market alone. They need the casual users to make money. I dont mind. If not for them we wouldnt have the platform.
Demanding fairness in only one area, but dismissing it in others is simply an example of supporting personal bias. You want the manner in which you play to be the only way to play.
Um how's Warrio doing these days?
The change makes it fair for everybody at the expense of your personal biased preferance, not at the expense of fairness but to its benefit.
Your suggesting to keep it unfair so that you may preserve your personal preference, that's selfish.