Whatever happened to colours like "dark green" and "red"?
Personally I don't think that color suits the SS, it more of a sleeper and it doesn't look right on the car.
If they made a more hardcore version with a more aggressive body kit, it would look better with a color like that.
But Peacock Green and Alchemy Purple look amazing !
But why an '03?-> Heres a good article to share:
The Comparison: 2003 BMW M5 vs. 2015 Chevrolet SS
^ From Road&Track magazine.
Because V8.But why an '03?
^ The last year of the greatest M5 ever built.But why an '03?
But why an '03?
^ Whoops! I just assume to round it off. lol*4.9L V8
^ You're welcome!@The Vanishing Boy Thanks for posting that. I saw it on another forum a week or so ago, and of course, I had to go out and grab myself a copy.
^ I kinda felt that this comparison test was rushed. Usually, these buff-book peeps takes their time to test olders car with fresher OEM spec (or equivalent) tire.One thing that I didn't like about the article was that they complained about the lack of grip, but then admitted that the tires were at their end of life. Given how important tires are to how well cars handle and fee, I feel that R&T, or the owner, should have fitted the car with some fresh(er) tires so that there's some semblance of fairness between the Chevy SS and it.
^ I'll never forget my experience with E39 M5. That is why I'm perplexed about on how the Pontiac G8 GXP and the Chevy SS drives.I love, and am still kind of blown away at how 15 years later, the E39 is still the gold standard. Considering what they said in the article, imagine just how good it must have been compared to everything else when it was first introduced. I would drive and try out the SS though. I like how it looks, and is a very intriguing proposition.
^ You can point out that the E39's 'angel eyes' (which was pictured) were only featured in 2003, before it got replaced by the E60.That generation (E39) of the M5 was sold in the US from 2000-2003. It didn't really matter which year of those that they picked, they probably just conveniently know a guy or found a car that happened to be an 03.
^ This alone is the reason for me that the SS is so much more desirable even compared to my wagon favorite, a certified pre-owned CTS-V. Plus the VF will be the last Aussie-American car that will ever grace in the US, which it does mean a whole lot to car fans.The E39 generation was the only naturally aspirated V8 ever fitted to a M5, similar to the Chevy SS, and both the E39 and the new SS are of similar weights, power, speed, and design/driving philosophy. Me and my friend were trying to figure out what V8 manual sedans are sold new in the US anymore, and we could only come up with a handful; add natural aspiration, and it's really only the SS that meets those criteria.
More importantly, why don't we have an SS Wagon yet?~> Owh! Which one to pick!? The CTS-V Wagon or the SS?
Because a lot people in our country don't like wagons, they like bulky (and boring in my opinion) SUVs & Crossovers.More importantly, why don't we have an SS Wagon yet?
^ You can point out that the E39's 'angel eyes' (which was pictured) were only featured in 2003, before it got replaced by the E60.
~> Owh! Which one to pick!? The CTS-V Wagon or the SS?
It practically falls to a choice between Luxury Looks and Sports Performance or Full on Sports and Looks Performance...Angel eyes came with the facelift in 2001, so actually, a vast majority of the E39 M5s came with angel eyes.
In the end, I think I would want the CTS-V, especially the new one that was just introduced. The SS is nice, but I really want the luxury of the Caddy.