HOOAH to that! Remember it was only a week ago that the Olmet said that there would be no cessasion in the hostilities between Israel and Lebanon until a) Hezbollah were destroyed or disarmed, b) A 'robust' international force was deployed in the south of Lebanon, and c) the two captured Israeli soldiers were released. Isn't it strange that just a week later, they are willing to accept a ceasefire and a UN resolution, and happily 'forget' about their captured soldiers?
Obviously, something was said somewhere (and I don't mean at the UN), or why else why Israel agree to a ceasefire and UN resolution that was not in their favour? Who ever 'eventually' convinced Israel to stop the assault on Lebanon, must have very little conscience. Destroying a nation, killing many innocent civillians and creating social, economic and ecological disasters is not an acceptable response for the capture of two soldiers no matter what the circumstances. Looking back, its plain to see that Israel has gained nothing from the last five weeks, and lost a lot.
If every bomb makes a martyr, then how many martyrs have Israel created?
Your defending the indefensible. Seeing the terrible images of destruction on the News in Lebanon, its clear that Israel was not just targetting Hezbollah. Huge residential areas in Lebanons cities are in ruins, whole towns and villages have been reduced to rubble. Judging by the scale of the devastation, Israel would have you believe that Hezbollah was endemic in Lebanon society, but that is not the case - they only hold a few seat in the nations parliment. Yes Hezbollah had support, but it was mostly tacet. Remember Hezbollah drove Israel form Lebanon and ended a long and bloody occupation, so they were seen as a resistance force - the countries liberators.
I meant that you edited the article itself to reflect your viewpoint 
. 
And they won't aim for a military target, either... they'll just keep lobbing munitions into civilian areas at random, as most terrorists are wont to do.
