live4speed
The Veyron would beat a Formula 1 car on a typical oval circuit.
I seriously doubt it. The Veyron would be faster in a straight line, that's true (above a certain speed anyway), but it couldn't even begin to approach the cornering speed of an F1 car. The Veyron may have big, fat tyres, but they're not racing tyres and they're a hard enough compound to be able to run for thousands of miles. The Veyron may have it's "handling" special high-downforce mode, but how much downforce does it really produce (even at high speed)? I've got no idea, but I'd be extremely surprised if it's even a quarter of that produced by a modern F1 car at the same speed. Not to mention its weight (2100kg including fluids).
Now, an F1 car, on the other hand, is a purpose built car for racing tracks. It's light (600kg including driver in a race), it produces high levels of downforce even at 'low' speeds (we've all heard they can drive upside down at 100mph, and that fact was about 5+ years ago, so it's probably even lower speed now) and they have huge grooved racing tyres. Granted, F1 cars aren't designed to drive on ovals, the current F1 calendar doesn't have any sustained high speed sections (Indy and Monza probably have the longest acceleration zones, but they're much less than the length of a 'straight' on a Superspeedway). The engines aren't built for huge periods of full throttle running, so the F1 car might blow up, but for the time it's running it'll obliterate the Veyron round any oval (and around any track that contains at least one corner, probably).
Right, sorry for going off topic, G.T
Back on topic...I don't really see the poing in making the Veyron even quicker. What they've done already is enough to make the statement they intended to, IMO. I'm also surprised that 200hp is enough to push them an extra 19mph, I thought it might take more than that at that speed.