It seems the styling is somewhat polarizing. It does look a little bloated, and I think that's due to the fact that the body's so wide and the greenhouse is so small. I thought that when I first saw the Camaro concept, too, but I've grown used to that.
I've been saying for a long while, now, that there's a lot of R35 GT-R in the way the Evo X looks, and I'm glad people are agreeing with me, now. I'm liking the VERY fast roofline, now...previous Skylines had notchbacks, but this is nearly a fastback. nearly. It's a bit like the '68 Charger: halfway between Fastback and Hardtop. Perhaps that's why I like it so much.
I'm not sure about the wing: it looks kind of short and squat, and I'm not sure, but I may hope for a wing delete option. Or a different wing.
Interior: well, who's going to carpool in a car like this, anyway? If the aim is the 911, well, let's just say that no-one's ever wanted to ride in the backseat of a Porsche other than a Cayenne. The dash layout is nice and fairly simple for a car of this price point, though I could do without an MFD. Keep those in Fighter Jets, please.
Engine: Someone put that in the Beautiful Engines thread, now. I love that they decided NOT to cover it in miles of plastic. (My big critisim of the Corvette's LS series motors are the big plastic covers on the sides of the engine) and it's one of the cleanest-looking modern engines i've seen.
Fixes?: Well, some vents alongside the main grille, under the headlights, might help the look a bit, and perhaps a spoiler that attached at the edges instead of towards the middle of the trunk. Or spoiler delete, with a nice little kick-up tail. Notching the rear profile, like on the R34 GT-R, would help the rear look less bulbous.
Soooo, Nissan....how about that Super GT car, eh?