- 1,377
- zzxxz
I think it's a level of national interest that plays a big part as well. The Spanish hadn't won a gp race I think before Criville came along, certainly not a championship before his in 1999. Then by the mid 2000s there was Pedrosa, Lorenzo and Elias in the lower classes coming through, it gets more coverage and more youngsters get into it and the national series gets more interest and sponsorship. The British have had a more consistent thing in the superbikes since Foggy in the 90s and Hodgson and Toseland in 03/04 so the British superbikes has always had good support from fans and teams alike to get the riders onto the world stage and it's paying dividends now.How is it a setback? The Spanish and Italian sporting federations have clearly invested in their national series to promote young talent.
To address the original point with a few facts:
Race wins by rider nationality since the start of 2015:
Moto GP (26 races):
Spanish: 19 (3 riders)
Italian: 6 (1 rider)
Australian: 1
Moto 2:
French: 11 (1 rider)
Spanish: 7 (2)
German/British/Swiss: 2 each (1)
Japanese/Belgian: 1 each
Moto 3:
Italian: 7 (4)
British/Portuguese: 6 each (1)
South African: 3 (1)
French/Belgian/Spanish/Malaysian: 1 each
WSBK (42 races):
British: 40 (4)
American/Spanish: 1 each
WSS (20 races):
Turkish: 9 (1)
French: 4 (1)
British/American: 2 each (1)
Thai/Italian/Swiss: 1 each
I think I've shown that's exaggerating quite a bit and there's certainly no setback from forcing other countries to try and catch up. While there's no denying the CEV in the best way into the gp paddock it's up to the individual sports federations to get their riders in that championship (there are 4 team Asia riders doing well this season). However when the current top riders in Moto gp retire it probably won't be an abundance of Spanish riders taking over.Anyhow the very fact you have Spainards and Italians dominating the grid's of both WSBK and MotoGP at the top,middle and lower levels is a huge setback for the sport.