- 9,055
- Murica
- BasedAckbar
Maybe they recorded the 2017 TS050 on someone's mobile phone.
Just heard on radio Le mans that there is a strong chance that boardroom shakeups at VAG will be removing the ring fence around Porsche's WEC budget.
As in increasing the budget or slicing it?Just heard on radio Le mans that there is a strong chance that boardroom shakeups at VAG will be removing the ring fence around Porsche's WEC budget.
Just received an email from PERRINN. Hope they can pull it off.
Just heard on radio Le mans that there is a strong chance that boardroom shakeups at VAG will be removing the ring fence around Porsche's WEC budget.
Guess I can place this here
http://www.cams.com.au/media/news/latest-news/australian-prototype-series-launches-into-2017
We've seen Radicals run on The Mountain. Imagine seeing that one guy with an Oreca Nissan or a Deltawing or a Porsche have a run.Hmmmmm, I'm not sure about this on Australian shores, I know at a semi club level this has been gradually thriving, but the rules now allow LMP2 and LMP3 machinery, there is always that 'one guy' with to much money,
The fat lady was seen warming up her vocal cords for the demise of LMP1-H.
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/128382/lmp1-technology-cut-could-prompt-toyota-exit
But Toyota says the program has no end. The budget was upped last year and they were given it to invest in a third hybrid (ers). 2 kers front and rear, and a heat recovery like the Porsche. But those rules were pushed back or canned till at least 2020 so the funds went to making this generation's car even better and getting a third one for Spa and LM.3 cars to win Le Mans, committed thru '17 only, I can see them pulling the plug if they manage to get that win.
DC Racing sign a couple of hot shoes. http://sportscar365.com/lemans/wec/jarvis-brundle-confirmed-at-dc-racing/
But Toyota says the program has no end. The budget was upped last year and they were given it to invest in a third hybrid (ers). 2 kers front and rear, and a heat recovery like the Porsche. But those rules were pushed back or canned till at least 2020 so the funds went to making this generation's car even better and getting a third one for Spa and LM.
Porsche came back because the hybrid rules. Toyota returned at the start of the hybrid rules. What would they stay for if the aco ditches them to attract 'cheap' Peugeot with no road relevance?
'No end point' and no plans confirmed beyond 2017 and no more $$ but make do with what we have already given you = win the 24 and we will have some nice parting gifts for you on your way to the next challenge. Maybe the engine could be used to supply a future LMP1 privateer program and the team will shift focus to a GTE program, or Formula car swap once they figure out how stupid that idea is and make them use the same car for a entire race.But Toyota says the program has no end. The budget was upped last year and they were given it to invest in a third hybrid (ers). 2 kers front and rear, and a heat recovery like the Porsche. But those rules were pushed back or canned till at least 2020 so the funds went to making this generation's car even better and getting a third one for Spa and LM.
Porsche came back because the hybrid rules. Toyota returned at the start of the hybrid rules. What would they stay for if the aco ditches them to attract 'cheap' Peugeot with no road relevance?
No, it means they have already increased the budget for the new rules/car in 2016. And in light of the rules now staying the same until 2019, Audi dropping out, Porsche continuing with only 2 cars, a drop to only two bodykits and the ACO talking about cost cuts, why would they get another increase?'No end point' and no plans confirmed beyond 2017 and no more $$ but make do with what we have already given you = win the 24 and we will have some nice parting gifts for you on your way to the next challenge. Maybe the engine could be used to supply a future LMP1 privateer program and the team will shift focus to a GTE program, or Formula car swap once they figure out how stupid that idea is and make them use the same car for a entire race.
The better question is why would they keep spending after 2017 if there is nothing left to change?No, it means they have already increased the budget for the new rules/car in 2016. And in light of the rules now staying the same until 2019, Audi dropping out, Porsche continuing with only 2 cars, a drop to only two bodykits and the ACO talking about cost cuts, why would they get another increase?
They get an annual budget, it's not like the funds are dried up. I don't get what you're saying, really. If the cars are staying the same until at least 2019, Toyota and Porsche don't have to invest huge sums into brand new designs. That means if they do make a new monocoque, it's going to be to the same rules so there shouldn't be major costs in a redesign. And if the current cars are eligible for 3 more years, why quit now with a complying car? I could see the reasoning behind quitting in 2020 but not next year or 2019.The better question is why would they keep spending after 2017 if there is nothing left to change?
Monza test