Can you tell me how it works? I haven't seen any explanations.Wish Supercars would have this qualifying format every round. Makes the practice sessions a hell of a lot more interesting.
Can you tell me how it works? I haven't seen any explanations.
Oh, I remember now. So the top 10 cars in practice 2 don't need to participate in qualifying 1. Right?Not seen any of the coverage today. Unless they've changed it. I'm assuming it's the same as last year. 10 minute qualifying session for the cars that finished outside the top ten. The top four of that group go through to Q2 and the top ten from that make up the shootout.
Oh, I remember now. So the top 10 cars in practice 2 don't need to participate in qualifying 1. Right?
I don't think Practice 2 is in the mix for that. I think that's Practice 3 which is coming up in a couple hours.
Both Shell V-Power Racing Team entries, both Penrite Racing entries, and Walkinshaw Andretti United’s Chaz Mostert were among the others to make the top 10 cut-off which determines who earns a bye to Part 2 of Saturday’s qualifying proceedings.
It's not good when none of us that follow the sport were sure how it worked. I thought it was Practice 3 too, mainly because Skaifey didn't get all excited and do himself a mischief in the last couple of minutes of P 2.I'm not sure why they didn't make the third practice session the one that counted toward qualifying. The schedule is weird.
(From Speedcafe.)
For decades I once knew exactly how the ATCC worked. In the recent Supercar era, things have been fiddled with, simply for the case of fiddling, so much, I can't tell you half of what I used to know without looking it up.It's not good when none of us that follow the sport were sure how it worked. I thought it was Practice 3 too, mainly because Skaifey didn't get all excited and do himself a mischief in the last couple of minutes of P 2.
Don't forget The Big Ginge.Who would have thought all WAU needed was a decent driver and control shocks
Yeah it’s the top 10 cars in practice 3 that progress to qualifying 2. My mistake.
No Barry, the Mustangs couldn't remain untouched, it's not as simple as adjusting COG... and yes Barry, there would be a definite need for the Mustang guys to change.He also believes that from a competition standpoint the change could be easily accounted for, meaning cars built with the existing chassis, and specifically the Mustang, could remain untouched.
“If we’re only lowering it by 40mm, we’ve got the COG rules now, so we know how to calculate the COG,” he said.
“It just means you might have a bit more lead in the roof than cars that have got a lower main hoop but I’m sure if it, let’s say it was Camaro and Mustang, Mustang guys would probably just change all their chassis just so they can meet the new rules, but there wouldn’t be a definite need to if you can get the COG right.”
https://www.speedcafe.com/2020/02/22/ryan-camaro-chassis-actually-really-simple/
From Barry Ryan:
No Barry, the Mustangs couldn't remain untouched, it's not as simple as adjusting COG... and yes Barry, there would be a definite need for the Mustang guys to change.
A 40mm lower roof lined car would have a definite aero advantage. That's why they wouldn't let WAU do it to the Camaro before
.... and this is without even thinking of other manufacturers
Edit: I just noticed this: “It just means you might have a bit more lead in the roof than cars that have got a lower main hoop''.
Proper COG would make it the other way round
''more lead in the roof than cars that have got a lower main hoop''What other manufacturers? Also I'm confused to why this is debated, do we know if Camaros are ever going to join? With Holden getting axed completely and GM so far not seeing a need to even be in Australia...where does this continued conversation fit in? Furthermore, why would any other manufactures really want to join the series if there is no further gain beyond trying to win in essentially a regional championship?
What do you mean proper CoG would make it the other way around? It seems to me that he's saying the balance would be done differently, between the two and thus nothing is unfair in that regard, each car would still have a way to have optimal CoG based on their design. The problem, like you said though, is the aero advantage would be massively different and that would need to be solved.
The times dropped off in the second half of the shootout though. Was Reynolds dropping fluids?
I'm sure if it was slippery they would have said something.Didn't think of that at the time but it would explain why the last three cars weren't able to challenge Whincup's time.
Power steering fluidThe times dropped off in the second half of the shootout though. Was Reynolds dropping fluids?