- 86,713
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
Mercedes came up with this - though it is only a Photoshop of the F1 2022 Prototype:I hope that what the teams come up with can actually somehow look something a lot nicer
Mercedes came up with this - though it is only a Photoshop of the F1 2022 Prototype:I hope that what the teams come up with can actually somehow look something a lot nicer
Damn. I was hoping it would have #63 on it.Mercedes came up with this - though it is only a Photoshop of the F1 2022 Prototype:
View attachment 1067907
What a way to announce it that would have been!Damn. I was hoping it would have #63 on it.
It would have been a greater troll if it had a #77 on itDamn. I was hoping it would have #63 on it.
Out of who was mentioned in that article I feel like Haas is the most likely candidate to sell, or at least make it a 50/50 partnership to start out. I can't see Dorilton wanting to ditch their investment in Williams so quickly, and I've heard nothing about Alfa seeking to make an exit.Michael Andretti is looking to buy an F1 team, not sure why though considering he can't even get his team that races in a 99.9% spec series to be consistently competitive.
Andretti pursuing Formula 1 team takeover
The United States could have another team in Formula 1 if the efforts of a former driver prove to be successful. RACER has learned Andretti Autosport team owner Michael Andretti has been actively p…racer.com
Didn't Alfa just do a new 5 year deal or something?Rumour is that Andretti is looking to buy Sauber with some financial help from Gainbridge. They currently sponsor Colton Herta’s car in indy. 2023 is their target apparently.
No, just a one year extension to the end of 2022 season.Didn't Alfa just do a new 5 year deal or something?
They have a deal until 2024, but with yearly assessments. So they can pull out at any time if they want.Didn't Alfa just do a new 5 year deal or something?
Well Tobi works for AMuS who are relatively reliable, certainly more than most random "journalists" on twitter, but it's indeed still just the same 3rd party chatter we've heard for over two decades now."According to our info" = "Some bloke at the pub swears it, and certainly the economic situation won't change in the next four years".
I'd imagine if both joined the program would be jointly developed similar to how their LMDh program is. At that point it would just be a question of what team uses what brand or if they just slap both on the car 917-30 style.It seems a little odd to me that both Audi and Porsche would join, that's 2 brands from the VAG umbrella and i'm guessing a hell of a lot of money spent developing and running 2 'different' teams / suppliers (however they end up joining)
Are they both not interested in WEC too?
That's how i see it working. Same engine, badged as Audi for one team and as Porsche for another. Like they do with their wheelie bin lid engine covers on their road cars.I would be more inclined to believe it would be along the lines of VAG producing the engine and being released under two licenses.
Tie up with Red Bull, Red Bull Porsche and AlphaTauri Audi would be likely.It seems a little odd to me that both Audi and Porsche would join, that's 2 brands from the VAG umbrella and i'm guessing a hell of a lot of money spent developing and running 2 'different' teams / suppliers (however they end up joining)
Are they both not interested in WEC too?
I still hate the AlphaTauri name but surely it has to be marketed as AlphaTaudi.Tie up with Red Bull, Red Bull Porsche and AlphaTauri Audi would be likely.
AudiTauri?I still hate the AlphaTauri name but surely it has to be marketed as AlphaTaudi.
If we keep ignoring WeRaceAsOne how about AlphaSaudi?I still hate the AlphaTauri name but surely it has to be marketed as AlphaTaudi.
I would be more inclined to believe it would be along the lines of VAG producing the engine and being released under two licenses.
Thats what I thought too, so then there is nothing in the technical regs stating an engine supplier must solely be responsible for the design and build of it or anything along those lines? I know a few years ago the Red Bull Renault was rebranded as TAG, but if I'm remembering correctly wasn't there input from Ilmor (Or a different company?)Tie up with Red Bull, Red Bull Porsche and AlphaTauri Audi would be likely.
VAG wouldn't need to worry about, the changes in the rules announced a couple of years ago actively encourage it as part of the new generation.Thats what I thought too, so then there is nothing in the technical regs stating an engine supplier must solely be responsible for the design and build of it or anything along those lines? I know a few years ago the Red Bull Renault was rebranded as TAG, but if I'm remembering correctly wasn't there input from Ilmor (Or a different company?)
Ferrari are doing their best to prevent it though, they'll veto any attempts to let them have a higher spend/dev to start with. From the BBC article:VAG wouldn't need to worry about, the changes in the rules announced a couple of years ago actively encourage it as part of the new generation.
From Ross Brawn:
"There are regulations coming out which would mean new entrants will get support from existing entrants. There will be components and technology which will have to be shared if it is requested.
"There has been a recognition from the existing manufacturers that they can't shut the door behind them. If we start to get serious interest from another manufacturer or supplier, they have to cooperate to find ways of helping that manufacturer come into F1."
Part of the new rules governing engines from 2026 will be a budget cap and other limitations on development. It had been proposed that any new manufacturer - eg a VW brand - be given a leg-up by allowing them higher levels of spending and/or development either as they geared up to entry, or when they first started in F1.
But the existing manufacturers - particularly Ferrari - have refused to accept this. Negotiations are ongoing, but as Ferrari have said no, this is unlikely to be agreed.