2024 US Presidential Election Thread

  • Thread starter ryzno
  • 1,838 comments
  • 93,652 views
You're exposing more of your country's flaws & evidence of why it needs new leadership if you think Jan 6th. constitutes mostly peaceful. Politicians aren't barricaded or evacuated under "mostly peaceful" protests....

That's funny because measles can be traced back to your group. Ya know, the one who is anti-vaccine.


Wow! That's one hell of an assumption you must have really put some thought into that! I'm sure all those young people that had heart attacks after getting the vaccine that they didn't need .I'm sure they will trace that back to the group of your people that forced them to get it.
 
Yes sarcasm goes right over a head like yours

:lol:

I got that it was sarcastic. Apparently you didn't. See, my response required yours to be sarcastic. I did not think you were actually feeling loved. If I did, my response would make no sense.


Edit:

Wait, omg, it's worse. You're claiming your medicated comment was sarcastic. :lol:
 
Last edited:
:lol:

I got that it was sarcastic. Apparently you didn't. See, my response required yours to be sarcastic. I did not think you were actually feeling loved. If I did, my response would make no sense.
Yeah you missed the mark on that one. I didn't see any sarcasm in your comment. Although I'd like to stay here all day arguing with you idiots I'm going to go ahead and leave. I got to pay for a bunch of illegal aliens and and student loans.
 
Wow! That's one hell of an assumption you must have really put some thought into that!
You mocked me for taking a booster? It's an easy assumption to make you're an anti-vaccine advocate.
I'm sure all those young people that had heart attacks after getting the vaccine that they didn't need .
Except the risk of the heart attack was higher without the vaccine.
I'm sure they will trace that back to the group of your people that forced them to get it.
Careful. That's your candidate's vaccine you're speaking ill of.
I want to thank all within the Trump Administration who pushed so hard for a vaccine.
 
Yeah you missed the mark on that one. I didn't see any sarcasm in your comment. Although I'd like to stay here all day arguing with you idiots I'm going to go ahead and leave. I got to pay for a bunch of illegal aliens and and student loans.

:lol:

Us "idiots" are not likely to give you the love you want when you come back.

I want so badly to ask you how much you make. Because.... I'm guessing you don't pay for as much as you think.
 
Last edited:
Correlation does not imply causation.

Of course the correlation that you asserted as causation, that diseases exist in a country as a result of open borders, is itself founded upon the falsehood that the border is open. An open border necessitates a total lack of restrictions and a total lack of enforcement of those restrictions.

"Illegal immigration" is a red herring. It's illegal because government prohibits it. That's it. Government prohibits it because nativist parasites want to keep people from other countries out.

you idiots
Cries like a little bitch about a lack of civility despite having started discussion with derogatory remarks and continuing to sling them. Very Trumpy.
 
Many diseases that are coming through the southern border that are being transmitted measles is one.
You cite measles as coming in through the Southern border. So far this year, the US has had 159 cases of measles, with a majority being in Illinois:

However, if you look at historical data, two of the biggest jumps in measles cases occurred while Trump was president. So, was he letting in vaccinated migrants or what? In fact, 2019 saw the biggest jump in cases since 1992.

But really, if you look at countries where measle outbreaks happen, you don't see any Latin American countries:

The biggest reason for the uptick in measles in the US is not from migrants but people who traveled abroad and brought the disease back with them. Then, due to a lower vaccine acceptance, more people are getting the disease since herd immunity isn't as good.
 
They should, its still occupation of government building by crowd. Things could always go ugly way, even if no one wants cause violence.

It was very violent. Just watch a few of the videos of the attack. It doesn't take much research to see just how violent it was. It would have been moreso if they'd gotten to the people they wanted to get to.
 
Last edited:
I'm saying that I know for sure that republicans were lined up to stop it unless it included support for Israel. I don't pretend to know Biden's personal thoughts on it, but given that he had started backing off on support for Israel, I think the aid package for Ukraine goes through without Israeli support unless republicans demand it. Biden's support had faltered some in light of sentiments from people like yourself.
I don't believe Biden's support for Israel has waned in any respect but words.

Not least because, just last week, the admin denied Netanyahu's claim that the US had withheld weapons, and Blinken "repeatedly underscored the Biden administration's commitment to Israel's defense."

"There has been no change in our posture" -Blinken

Not exactly pressure on Israel.


The US has also repeatedly refused to condition aid on Israel's avoidance of war crimes.

I don't see any reason to take any criticism of Israel or Netanyahu as anything but a cynical ploy to appease critics of the war. Unless and until he actually imposes any consequences, including withholdinh military aid, on Israel for any of its numerous crimes, I will take claims that Biden has changed his stance with a grain of salt.
I don't value any lives above any other lives (based on nationality. Putin can go to hell). But I think it's more dangerous for the world for Russia to prevail in Ukraine than for Israel to prevail (which it's going to do anyway) in the middle east. I don't want to see Ukraine become Vietnam, but they have put up a valiant effort that directly resulted in at least a threat on Putin's reign. All of that is good for all of the people of the world.

As far as utilitarianism goes, I reject that notion. I'm not a politician, I wouldn't want to be the one to hand over anything to Israel. But if you're accusing me of being a utilitarian because I'm willing to vote for one, I'm not sure that's fair either. I'm voting for a representative, and I recognize that that person may not be exactly what I would choose in all circumstances, but I'm also recognizing that getting that is not possible.
The utilitarian thing refers not to your voting, only to your position that a success in Ukraine is more important than stopping the killing in Gaza. If I had the choice to either send weapons to both Israel and Ukraine, or neither, I would choose neither. My assumption is that you would choose the former. To me that is the equivalent of flipping the lever in the trolley problem, which is usually described as the utilitarian choice. It's not that utilitarians don't care about lives, just that they will sometimes choose to take one life in order to save others. e.g. sending a missile to kill someone in Gaza to prevent Russian missiles from destabilizing the world and killing many more. This sounds like a scathing criticism but it's not. I get why people make choices like that. I just personally don't agree with it.

And again, I could be wrong about your opinion.
 
They should, its still occupation of government building by crowd. Things could always go ugly way, even if no one wants cause violence.
But, they did go ugly & violence was caused. They were barricaded because the crowd forced their way in whether assaulting officers or breaking down windows, & then when the crowd made their way to the chamber, US agents told them to stop and get back. The infamous woman in question ignored his order & was unfortunately killed for continuing to make her way towards the politicians. One of the other, more prominent figures was a man wearing paramilitary gear, then stole police zip-ties and carried them into the chamber.

That's not really my definition of mostly peaceful, my guy.
 
Last edited:
The utilitarian thing refers not to your voting, only to your position that a success in Ukraine is more important than stopping the killing in Gaza. If I had the choice to either send weapons to both Israel and Ukraine, or neither, I would choose neither. My assumption is that you would choose the former.

I guess your assumption of this is based on me voting for Biden - which is why I was saying it's about how I'm voting.

To me that is the equivalent of flipping the lever in the trolley problem, which is usually described as the utilitarian choice. It's not that utilitarians don't care about lives, just that they will sometimes choose to take one life in order to save others. e.g. sending a missile to kill someone in Gaza to prevent Russian missiles from destabilizing the world and killing many more. This sounds like a scathing criticism but it's not. I get why people make choices like that. I just personally don't agree with it.

And again, I could be wrong about your opinion.

There are a few things that you're conflating in this. One is that my person choice if faced with this decision would be the same as the person I voted for. And the second would be that giving someone a gun or money makes you complicit in their actions. For example, Biden's stated reason for giving aid to Israel is to help them thwart the horrible and terrible attacks from Iran [read my tone as one of disbelief] and other terrorists. That was his stated goal. And if he truly believes that, then is it his responsibility if they use that for other purposes?

I don't know everything that Biden has said or done publicly and behind closed doors to indicate what the weapons are to be used for or what circumstances the US will support. I do know that the US called or Israel to stop their abuses in Gaza.

If you gave me a lever that switched the trolley from destroying ukraine to destroying gaza, would I flip the liver to gaza? I'd like to think I would not - despite the fact that Ukraine is a bigger dam against loss of life and liberty.
 
Last edited:
Yeah you missed the mark on that one. I didn't see any sarcasm in your comment. Although I'd like to stay here all day arguing with you idiots I'm going to go ahead and leave. I got to pay for a bunch of illegal aliens and and student loans.
Trump voters are less than half as economically productive as Biden voters, per capita.
 
Last edited:
Always nice to welcomed with an open mind. By so many wonderful people. You really feel the love here.
I'm under no obligation to show respect to you when you started your sojourn to a forum where people actually care whether you're spewing garbage with Twitter level dogwhistles and personal attacks. Unless this wasn't you:
Oh yeah in America is not a democracy.
PS, most of you people on here need to be medicated.
 
It would have been moreso if they'd gotten to the people they wanted to get to.
Or not.
That's not really my definition of mostly peaceful, my guy.
Its not like shootout started after government agents started shooting down intruders. We are talking about US and far rights, if those guys want to go violent - they definitely could.
 
I guess your assumption of this is based on me voting for Biden - which is why I was saying it's about how I'm voting.



There are a few things that you're conflating in this. One is that my person choice if faced with this decision would be the same as the person I voted for. And the second would be that giving someone a gun or money makes you complicit in their actions. For example, Biden's stated reason for giving aid to Israel is to help them thwart the horrible and terrible attacks from Iran [read my tone as one of disbelief] and other terrorists. That was his stated goal. And if he truly believes that, then is it his responsibility if they use that for other purposes?

I don't know everything that Biden has said or done publicly and behind closed doors to indicate what the weapons are to be used for or what circumstances the US will support. I do know that the US called or Israel to stop their abuses in Gaza.

If you gave me a lever that switched the trolley from destroying ukraine to destroying gaza, would I flip the liver to gaza? I'd like to think I would not - despite the fact that Ukraine is a bigger dam against loss of life and liberty.
I was really referring to this line:

If I have to choose between Israel falling and Ukraine standing, I choose Ukraine standing.

Nothing more.

As far as bearing responsibility for other people's actions, no I don't believe a Biden voter is responsible for everything he does. (Nor did I assume you will vote for Biden, you were clear about that)

I do, however, think that if you have reason to believe a candidate will take certain actions, and you vote for that candidate with the knowledge and acceptance that those actions are likely to occur, then you do bear some responsibility for the results of those actions, even if you ostensibly oppose the actions in question (e.g. if you are voting for them for other reasons, despite your opposition).

I understand that people make decisions like that all the time. I just can't personally do it, when the action in question is funding a genocide. I acknowledge that you don't agree that's what is happening here.
 
Its not like shootout started after government agents started shooting down intruders. We are talking about US and far rights, if those guys want to go violent - they definitely could.
Because most of those folks wisely (& thankfully) didn't think to bring guns. I also think most of those around the woman killed were also unequipped to deal with seeing someone actually get shot & killed in front of their eyes (someone literally yelled, "Medic!" like it's a war movie).

It's not like US agents really even gave them a chance, either as I recall most of the politicians were mostly evacuated before the bulk of the crowd got near them. Still, these images do not really convey any sort of peaceful protesting. These folks were legitimately scared with gas masks issued.
jan6th.jpg

jan2.jpg


Edit* I'd wager if the recent coup-attempt in Bolivia was more peaceful than Jan 6th.
 
Last edited:
Nothing more.

Well I stick by that. I'm not willing to sacrifice Ukraine in order to punish Israel.

I do, however, think that if you have reason to believe a candidate will take certain actions, and you vote for that candidate with the knowledge and acceptance that those actions are likely to occur, then you do bear some responsibility for the results of those actions, even if you ostensibly oppose the actions in question (e.g. if you are voting for them for other reasons, despite your opposition).

I understand that people make decisions like that all the time. I just can't personally do it, when the action in question is funding a genocide. I acknowledge that you don't agree that's what is happening here.

I think you have to hold people accountable for what they actually want. Biden doesn't want genocide. And neither do I.
 
Biden doesn't want genocide.
At best I think Biden doesn't care about the deaths of Palestinians. Whether or not he wants genocide, as far as I'm concerned he is willing to accept it as the cost of doing business.

If he has seen half of the footage I've seen from Gaza, and hasn't used any leverage to try and get it to stop, then he has no concern for genocide.

Let's be clear, he has leverage. The weapons we give Israel are leverage because we can stop sending them.

US weapons have been used unlawfully to kill Palestinians.


It is against US law to send weapons to an entity commiting war crimes and violating the Geneva Conventions.


South Africa has alleged that Israel has committed war crimes, and the ICJ issued orders to Israel to change its actions to prevent the violation of international law.


The ICC Prosecutor applied for warrants for the arrest of Netanyahu and other Israeli (and Hamas) officials, citing "‘intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare’ as well as various other war crimes and crimes against humanity associated with starvation and other acts of violence against the Gazan civilian population."


Rather than use the warrants applications and the ICJ resolutions to pressure Israel, the US denied any wrongdoing and rejected the ICC's authority and jurisdiction. Biden called the warrants "outrageous".


I just don't see any evidence that Biden takes Israel's behavior seriously. He's not just refusing to sanction Israel. He's refusing to stop supporting them wholeheartedly.

I've watched the press conferences with State Dept and other officials. Every day it's denial about things the rest of the world has documented and accepted. With every piece of evidence of a war crime the response is "that's not our assessment" or "we have asked Israel to investigate"

If Biden claims he is against war crimes, I'd like him to provide some evidence of that. Saying it isn't good enough.
 
Last edited:
It would have been moreso if they'd gotten to the people they wanted to get to.
This is important. The intent was to disrupt congressional proceedings, but they were targeting individuals, identified by name, in the process.
These folks were legitimately scared with gas masks issued.
jan6th.jpg
So I appreciate that this image was selected. The chunky monkey in blue-grey cowering in the foreground is Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY). Understandably fearful on the day, Stefanik would later refer to those being held to account for actions which had her cowering as "hostages."
Well… he is, but probably not in the way @Racer294 is hoping.
You were actually beaten to this. That may make it funnier--a "great minds" sort of thing.
 
Back